Search

Aim: Patients with T3 or more squamous cell esophageal cancer underwent low-dose preoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy, to reduce local recurrence, followed by surgery. The aim was to ascertain tumor response and assess prognostic factors., Patients and Methods: Between May 2002 and June 2011, 37 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer underwent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The numbers of patients in clinical stages IIA/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC were 2/24/7/4, respectively. All were given a dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions, with concurrent chemotherapy using cisplatin and fluorouracil. Curative surgery was performed a median of 1.2 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy., Results: Based on the findings from surgery, 26 patients (70%) achieved a stage reduction and six patients (16%) had a complete pathological response. The numbers of patients undergoing resections microscopically complete, with microscopically positive margins, and macroscopically positive margins were 33, 3, and 1, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 22.5 months, the two-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 62.1% [95% confidence interval (CI)=45.8 to 78.4%] and 71.9% [95% CI=55.1 to 88.7%], respectively. Statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival were age [hazard ratio=6.6; 95% CI=1.1 to 38; p=0.04] and pathological T factor [hazard ratio=10.2; 95% CI=1.4 to 77; p=0.02]. No patients died as a result of surgery., Conclusion: Seventy percent of patients with esophageal cancer who received radiotherapy dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions combined with chemotherapy achieved a stage reduction with low toxicity.

Aim: To analyze retrospectively the results of postoperative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: The records of 47 patients treated with gross complete resection (R0: 24 patients, R1: 23 patients) and post-operative EBRT were reviewed. The median dose of EBRT was 50 Gy (range, 12-60 Gy), and chemotherapy was used in 37 patients (78.7%). The median follow-up period for all 47 patients was 14.4 months (range, 0.9-67.9 months)., Results: At the time of this analysis, 24 patients (51.1%) had disease recurrence. Local failure was observed in 10 patients (21.3%), and the 2-year local control (LC) rate in all patients was 68.7%. Patients treated with EBRT and chemotherapy had a significantly more favorable LC (2-year LC rate: 76.0%) than those treated with EBRT alone (2-year LC rate: 40%, p=0.0472). The median survival time and the 2-year actuarial overall survival (OS) in all 47 patients were 30.0 months and 54.5%, respectively. Patients treated with EBRT and chemotherapy had a significantly more favorable OS (2-year OS rate: 61.6%) than those treated with EBRT alone (2-year OS: 25.0%, p=0.0454). On univariate analysis, chemotherapy use alone had a significant impact on OS, and on multivariate analysis, chemotherapy use also was a significant prognostic factor. There were no late morbidities of NCI-CTC Grade 3 or greater., Conclusion: Post-operative EBRT with chemotherapy yields a favorable LC rate for resected pancreatic adenocarcionoma, and EBRT combined with chemotherapy confers a survival benefit compared to EBRT alone.

Background: Superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) is defined as esophageal cancer limited to the submucosal layers, including mucosal cancer and submucosal cancer, and is squamous cell carcinoma in most patients. In 2000, the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group for SEC published a consensus guideline of standard radiotherapy methods. In this study, the interim treatment outcomes of SEC patients, who had received radiation therapy following the standard radiotherapy methods, were investigated., Patients and Methods: From 2000 to 2003, a total of 141 SEC patients were treated in 24 institutions in Japan., Results: The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 95%, 90% and 90%, respectively, for patients with mucosal cancer and 90%, 81% and 70%, respectively, for patients with submucosal cancer. The overall survival was better in patients who had undergone chemotherapy than in patients who had received radiation therapy alone, though the difference was not statistically significant. The clinical target volume (CTV) did not influence overall survival and intracavitary irradiation did not influence the local control rate in either patients with mucosal or submucosal cancer. Radiation-induced esophageal ulcer was not observed in this series., Conclusion: The standard radiotherapy methods are safe and effective for treating SEC. However, the usefulness of chemotherapy and intracavitary irradiation and the optimal setting of the CTV should be clarified by future randomized trials.