Search

Background/aim: Recent advances in chemotherapy have made significant progress in conversion surgery (CS) for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC). However, the success rate and efficacy of CS have not been fully demonstrated in patients with uPC treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 318 patients with uPC who received FFX or GnP as first-line chemotherapy. The efficacy in the CS group, defined as undergoing complete resection after chemotherapy, was analyzed, and compared with the non-CS group; then, contributing factors to achieving CS were extracted. We also analyzed differences in the efficacy of CS between locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC)., Results: Overall, CS was achieved in 4.3% of cases, eight patients (13.3%) with LAPC and five (2.1%) with MPC. Contributing factors to CS were LAPC, no liver metastasis, CA19-9 ≤37, and chemotherapy response. After adjusting for these, overall survival was significantly better in the CS group than in the non-CS group [median of 32.9 vs. 11.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.14-0.70; p<0.01]. Median relapse-free survival duration after CS was 19.1 and 18.1 months in the LAPC-CS and MPC-CS group, respectively (p=0.84). The median post-conversion survival was 27.6 months in the entire CS group, 43.8 months in the LAPC-CS group and 21.3 months in the MPC-CS group., Conclusion: CS was achieved in 13.3% of LAPC and 2.1% of MPC cases. If possible, CS can markedly improve prognosis, even in MPC., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX for recurrent pancreatic cancer (rPC) after resection., Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients with rPC and 211 with de novo metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) who received GnP or FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed., Results: On crude analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the rPC group than in the mPC group (14.0 vs. 10.6 months, respectively; p=0.02). However, the difference was not significant on adjusted analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted p=0.90). Patients receiving FOLFIRINOX (n=10) and GnP (n=34) in the rPC group had comparable OS (medians, 12.2 vs. 14.4 months, respectively; p=0.82) even after adjusting for covariates using the Cox model (adjusted p=0.18)., Conclusion: The outcomes of patients in the rPC and mPC groups were comparable following chemotherapy. Both FOLFIRINOX and GnP may be reasonable options for treating rPC., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The local control rate of chondrosarcomas treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) worsens as tumour size increases, possibly because of the intra-tumoural linear energy transfer (LET) distribution. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between local recurrence and intra-tumoural LET distribution in chondrosarcomas treated with CIRT., Patients and Methods: Thirty patients treated with CIRT for grade 2 chondrosarcoma were included. Dose-averaged LET (LET d ) distribution was calculated by the treatment planning system, and the relationship between LET d distribution in the planning tumour volume (PTV) and local control was evaluated., Results: The mean LET d value in PTV was similar between cases with and without recurrence. Recurrence was not observed in cases where the effective minimum LET d value exceeded 40 keV/μm., Conclusion: LET d distribution in PTV is associated with local control in chondrosarcomas and patients treated with ion beams of higher LET d may have an improved local control rate for unresectable chondrosarcomas., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative chemotherapy on the healthy, metastasis-free part of the liver in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis, and the relationship between chemotherapy and postoperative complications., Patients and Methods: Our study included 90 cases of colorectal cancer liver metastasis resected after preoperative chemotherapy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the received chemotherapy regimen: 20 cases received mFOLFOX6, 54 cases a combination of mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab, and 16 cases a combination of mFOLFOX6 and cetuximab or panitumumab., Results: The mean numbers of sinusoidal injuries for each chemotherapy type were compared. The group treated with the combination of mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab showed a lower extent of sinusoidal injury relative to other groups; this intergroup difference became increasingly remarkable as the number of chemotherapy cycles increased. Complications of various extents were found in all three groups, but no significant differences were observed between the three groups., Conclusion: In cases where preoperative chemotherapy was extended over a long period, combined use of bevacizumab was thought to be effective because of stabilization of disturbed liver hemodynamics resulting from sinusoidal injury suppression effects, allowing effective distribution of anti-cancer agents to tumors., (Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel therapy as second-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer that was refractory to S-1., Patients and Methods: In total, 33 patients received intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg m(-2)) on days 1, 8 and 15 as part of a 4-week cycle., Results: Eight patients showed a partial response, 11 showed stable disease and 14 showed disease progression. In total, 171 courses (mean=5.2; range=3-16) were administered. Thirteen cases subsequently underwent third-line treatment. The median survival time and time to progression from the time of second-line treatment was 8.0 months and 4.2 months, respectively. The most common haematological toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia. Non-haematological toxicities were generally mild to moderate and controllable., Conclusion: This study showed favourable therapeutic outcomes for advanced gastric cancer patients. However, it will be necessary to confirm the advantages of paclitaxel treatment for S-1-refractory advanced gastric cancer in a larger population.