Search

Background: Hepatic arterial chemotherapy (HAC) is an effective treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). Phase I and II studies have already shown the feasibility and efficacy of intra-arterial oxaliplatin (OXA)., Patients and Methods: Twenty-one pre-treated patients with liver metastases who received HAC with OXA/folinic acid (FA)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at our Division between March 2000 and November 2003, were clinically examined. Most patients were heavily pre-treated with two or more systemic chemotherapeutic regimes. All patients received a percutaneously implanted catheter into the hepatic artery through femoral or transaxillary access. Treatment was administered every 14 days: OXA 100 mg/m2 as a 12-hour infusion on day 1; FA 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 and 3; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 as a continuous infusion on days 2 and 3., Results: Grade 3-4 toxicities were: asthenia (2 out of 21), transaminase elevation (2 out of 21) and pain (2 out of 21), nausea and vomiting (1 out of 21), neutropenia (1 out of 21), thrombocytopenia (1 out of 21) and neurotoxicity (1 out of 21). Main dose limiting toxicity was right upper quadrant pain. Response rates were: 5% complete response, 19% partial response, 28% stable disease and 48% progressive disease. Two patients became operable and underwent complete resection of liver disease. The median overall survival was 36.1 months. Two-year and 3-year survival rates were 62% and 52%, respectively., Conclusion: This regimen is feasible with low toxicity and with an encouraging overall tumor growth control (52%) in a subset of heavily pre-treated patients. Intra-arterial OXA/FA/5-FU should be considered for the treatment of patients pre-treated with systemic chemotherapies with liver metastases from CRC.

Both CAV (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine) and PE (Cisplatin, Etoposide) are effective and non cross-resistant regimens in the treatment of SCLC. We designed a chemotherapeutic scheme including CAV and PE given in an alternating fashion with the following schedule: Cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/sm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sm, Vincristine 2 mg/sm I.V. on day 1, alternated every 21 days with Cisplatin 20 mg/sm and Etoposide 80 mg/sm I.V. days 1-5 for 6 cycles. Following chemotherapy (CT) chest radiotherapy in patients (pts) with limited disease (LD) in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in CRs were given, 32 pts entered the study and 27 were evaluable: 9/27 (33.3%) had CR (8/15 with LD had CR) and 15/27 (55.5%) PR. The overall median survival was 53.71 weeks: 79.85 weeks for LD pts and 32.86 for ED.4 pts with LD were alive after 2 years and 2 of them are still alive without disease at 44 and 46 months. Toxicity was acceptable in all patients. Alternating chemotherapy with CAV and PE followed by chest and brain RT in responding LD pts is an effective induction treatment for SCLC although long-term survival still remains disappointing.

Sixteen patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer, unsuitable for standard aggressive intravenous chemotherapy due to advanced age or poor performance status or very advanced disease including brain metastases or either extensive liver or marrow involvement with impaired organ function, were treated with combined oral chemotherapy including 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (IMI30, idarubicin) 30 mg/sm on day 1 and etoposide (VP16) 150 mg/sm on days 2,3,4 every 4 weeks. Out of 13 evaluable patients 1 had a complete response and 2 had a partial response with an overall objective response rate of 23% (95% confidence-limits 5-53.8%). Toxicity was generally very mild. Although the compliance of this regimen is excellent, its antitumor activity seems unsatisfactory even in this category of poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients.