Search

A proposal for an autonomous and flexible ship container inspection system is presented. This could be accomplished by the incorporation of an inspection system on various container transportation devices (straddle carriers, yard gentry cranes, automated guided vehicles, trailers). The configuration is terminal specific and it should be defined by the container terminal operator. This enables that no part of the port operational area is used for inspection. The inspection scenario includes container transfer from ship to transportation device with the inspection unit mounted on it. The inspection is performed during actual container movement to the container location. A neutron generator without associated alpha particle detection is used. This allows the use of higher neutron intensities ( $5\times {10^9} - {10^{10}} \ \text{n/s}$ in $4\pi $ ). The inspected container is stationary in the “inspection position” on the transportation device while the “inspection unit” moves along its side. The following analytical methods will be used simultaneously: neutron radiography, X-ray radiography, neutron activation analysis, (n, $\gamma $ ) and (n,n’ $\gamma $ ) reactions, neutron absorption. and scattering, X-ray backscattering. The neutron techniques will utilize “smart collimators” for neutrons and gamma rays, both emitted and detected. The inspected voxel is defined by the intersection of the neutron generator and the detectors solid angles. The container inspection protocol is based on identification of discrepancies between the cargo manifest, elemental “fingerprint” and radiography profiles. In addition, the information on container weight is obtained during the container transport and screening by measuring of density of material in the container.

A next generation system, as an upgrade of a robotic mobile system for anti-personnel landmine clearance, was considered. In contrast to the first generation system where the fast neutron activation method and the associated alpha particle imaging (API) was supposed to be used for finding the residual explosives and/or landmines, in the next generation system fast neutrons (FN) was considered to be used only for the confirmation of the explosive in the suspected object previously found by the ground penetrating radar (GPR), metal detector (MD) and infrared imaging (IR). Such system is expected to have the acceptable price and the optimal demining vehicle speed of 10 cm/s. In contrast to the previous system only one neutron generator (NG) is needed. In order to study the possibility of FN to confirm the presence of TNT explosive in the real environment the tests were made with the soil of different moisture contents. Comparative study was done by using the $7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; times 7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; $ BGO, $7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; times 7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; {; ; rm LaBr}; ; _{; ; 3}; ; :{; ; rm Ce}; ; $ and $7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; times 7.62~hbox{; ; cm}; ; $ NaI(Tl) gamma-ray detectors. Although nitrogen was easily detected in larger amount of TNT explosive, its signal was weak in detection of Anti-Personal (AP) mine like DLM2.4. The presences of soil additionally diminish the possibility of nitrogen detection even in the Anti-Tank mines (AT).