Search

Background: We compared the AdvanSure hepatitis B virus real-time polymerase chain reaction (AdvanSure HBV) kit with three other HBV DNA quantification assays and evaluated its performance., Methods: The AdvanSure HBV real-time PCR assay was compared with the Abbott RealTime HBV Quantification Kit, the COBAS TaqMan HBV Test, and the VERSANT HBV branched DNA 3.0 assay. The precision, linearity, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), cross reactivity, and genotype inclusivity of the assays were compared, and any influence of the sampling tube type was evaluated., Results: The AdvanSure HBV PCR showed good correlations with the three other HBV DNA assays. The R(2) coefficients were 0.944, 0.939, and 0.921 with the Abbott RealTime HBV Quantification Kit, the COBAS TaqMan HBV Test, and the VERSANT bDNA 3.0 assay, respectively. Linearity was good in the tested range of 1.15-8.45 log10 IU/ml. The lower LOD result was consistent with the 18 IU/ml claimed by the manufacturer. HBV genotypes A-F were all correctly amplified, and no cross reactivity was found in samples with high HCV RNA levels or high protein concentrations. The results were not influenced by the sample preparation tube (i.e. plain tube, SST, and EDTA containing tubes)., Conclusion: The AdvanSure HBV real-time PCR assay is a reliable method for quantifying HBV DNA levels in routine laboratory testing.

The numbers of antibody-binding sites of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa on circulating platelets were analyzed using 4 kinds of antibodies in 34 aplastic anemia (AA) patients, 20 idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) patients, and 14 normal controls. The numbers of antibody-binding sites of CD41, CD41a, CD41b, and CD61 on platelets of the AA patients were less than in the normal controls (p <0.001). In the ITP patients, the numbers of sites for CD41 and CD41a were less than in normal controls (p <0.05). There were significant positive correlations between CD41 and CD41a, CD41b, and CD61 in the 3 groups. There were significant negative correlations between CD41 and CD41b and between CD41a and CD41b in the normal controls, but not in the AA or ITP patients. In summary, the numbers of the 4 antibody-binding sites of GPIIb/IIIa on platelets of AA and ITP patients are different from those in normal controls. Measurements of the antibody-binding sites of GPIIb/IIIa are not necessary for the differential diagnosis of AA and ITP. However, the differences in correlations between the numbers of epitopes in AA and ITP patients suggest that the epitopes of GPIIb/IIIa are altered in these diseases.

To compare the culture screening protocols for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a total of 300 duplicate nasal swabs (233 initial cultures and 67 weekly follow-up cultures) were collected consecutively from 233 patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). One swab was plated directly on MRSA-Select agar (D-MRSA-Select) and observed at 24 hr. The duplicate swab was incubated in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with 6.5% NaCl for 24 hr, and then subcultured on MRSA-Select (B-MRSA-Select), BAP (B-BAP), and mannitol salt agar with 4 mg/L oxacillin (B-MSA(OXA)), and observed at 24 hr. MRSA was detected in 13.7% (32/233) of the initial and 22.4% (15/67) of the follow-up specimens. A patient was classified as MRSA-positive if any of the media grew colonies that were tested and confirmed to be MRSA. In the initial screening samples, the sensitivities of D-MRSA-Select, B-MRSA-Select, B-BAP, and B-MSA(OXA) were 78.1%, 84.4%, 78.1%, and 65.6%, respectively, and the specificities were 100%, 98.0%, 83.1%, and 93.5%, respectively. The sensitivities of all but the B-MRSA-Select protocol were significantly lower (p <0.05). In follow-up screening, the sensitivities of D-MRSA-Select, B-MRSA-Select, B-BAP, and B-MSA(OXA) were 66.7%, 86.7%, 66.7%, and 53.3%, respectively, and the specificities were 100%, 98.1%, 90.4%, and 90.4%, respectively. D-MRSA-Select protocol was considered useful in screening for MRSA because it was fast, highly specific, and showed sensitivity comparable to B-BAP. Salt-containing enrichment broth in conjunction with MRSA-Select (B-MRSA-Select) provides a promising way to increase sensitivity in initial and follow-up screening for MRSA.

To compare the sensitivity of various protocols for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance, active surveillance for detecting MRSA nasal colonization was performed on 97 members of the medical staff and 218 patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Duplicate nasal swabs were collected from each participant. One was plated directly on a blood agar plate (D-BAP) and observed at 24 and 48 hr. Another was incubated overnight in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with 6.5% NaCl, and subcultured on both BAP (B-BAP) and mannitol salt agar with 4 mg/L of oxacillin (B-MSAOXA). The MRSA colonization rate was similar in the medical staff and patient samples (16.5% vs 11.9%, p = 0.285). Among the medical staff members, the sensitivity of MRSA detection was the same (93.8%) in D-BAP and B-BAP. In the ICU patients, which are a high-risk group, the sensitivity of MRSA detection was improved by adding a pre-enrichment step (73.1% on D-BAP vs 96.2% on B-BAP). The simple direct plating protocol was sufficiently sensitive for the medical staff members, but pre-enrichment was an essential step to increase detection of MRSA in the ICU patients.