1. Functional genomics of stress responses in fish
- Author
-
Patrick Prunet, Tom G. Pottinger, Michael T. Cairns, Svante Winberg, Station commune de Recherches en Ichtyophysiologie, Biodiversité et Environnement (SCRIBE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), National University of Ireland (NUI), Uppsala University, and Lancaster University
- Subjects
transcriptomic approach ,Computational biology ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Aquatic Science ,Biology ,Bioinformatics ,Proteomics ,Zoologi ,Ecology and Environment ,Transcriptome ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,stress ,proteomics ,environmental factors ,14. Life underwater ,Gene ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,DNA microarray technology ,030304 developmental biology ,juvenile atlantic salmon ,fish ,0303 health sciences ,[SDV.BA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology ,Stressor ,gillichthys-mirabilis ,subtractive hybridization ,[SDV.BDLR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Reproductive Biology ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Gene Annotation ,gene-expression ,rainbow-trout ,Biology and Microbiology ,chemistry ,040102 fisheries ,Gene chip analysis ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,flounder platichthys-flesus ,Xenobiotic ,Functional genomics ,Zoology ,functional genomics ,trout oncorhynchus-mykiss ,cdna microarray - Abstract
International audience; Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying stress responses in fish remains fragmentary. However new insights into these mechanisms and their biological significance have been provided by investigation at the transcriptional level. Microarray technology has allowed the unbiased analysis of the transcriptome, providing a potentially system-wide overview of stress responses. In this review, we present recently published transcriptomic studies on stress responses in fish exposed to a range of environmental, xenobiotic, social, and aquacultural stressors. Overall, these studies highlight the complexity of transcript patients, have identified new genes whose expression is significantly modified after exposure to stressors, and have revealed both common and tissue-specific expression signatures. Some shortcomings can be identified, including lack of information on the longer-term compensatory or adaptive phases of the stress response, limitations on gene annotation, and the use of pooled mRNA preparations, which masks variation between individuals. Nonetheless, although the functional genomic analysis of stress responses in fish is still in its infancy, rapid growth in the number of studies and continued advances in technology and database content will inevitably lead to a fuller understanding of the processes involved and to the identification of novel stress indicators with diagnostic or predictive value.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF