1. Distinguishing groups of children with persistent speech disorder: Findings from a prospective population study
- Author
-
Laura L. Miller, Sue Roulstone, and Yvonne Wren
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Audiology ,Language Development ,Speech Acoustics ,Speech Disorders ,Developmental psychology ,Diagnosis, Differential ,Speech and Hearing ,Speech Production Measurement ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Predictive Value of Tests ,mental disorders ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Child ,Prospective cohort study ,education ,education.field_of_study ,Repetition (rhetorical device) ,Verbal Behavior ,musculoskeletal, neural, and ocular physiology ,LPN and LVN ,Language development ,Logistic Models ,England ,nervous system ,Population study ,Female ,Speech disorder ,medicine.symptom ,Psychology ,psychological phenomena and processes - Abstract
As part of a large-scale study of children's development, 7390 children were assessed on a range of speech tasks. These were used to identify three groups of children with speech errors within the sample: persistent speech disorder (PSD); speech errors but below the threshold for classification as persistent speech disorder (non-PSD); and common clinical distortions only (CCD). These three groups were compared on demographic factors, performance on IQ, non-word repetition, and diadochokinetic tests. Findings showed that the PSD group and the non-PSD group were most similar for gender, socio-economic status, IQ, and non-word repetition. In the diadochokinetic tasks, the PSD group and the CCD groups were more similar. Implications for these findings in terms of clinical practice are discussed.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF