Search

PURPOSE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex health condition requiring long-term rehabilitation. Person-centred goal-setting is a central component of rehabilitation. However, knowledge of patients' perspectives on the goal-setting in SCI rehabilitation is scarce. The purpose was therefore to explore patients' perspectives on goal-setting in multidisciplinary SCI rehabilitation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropological study combining participant-observation and individual interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to report study quality.RESULTS: Patients with SCI perceived goal-setting as ambiguous. On the one hand, they considered it insignificant, because it was complicated to transform complex needs of everyday life to recommended criteria of goals being measurable, specific, and realistic. On the other hand, they considered it a potentially useful guiding tool. Patients were uncertain of impact of goals and perceived goal-setting as vague during rehabilitation. Patient involvement was challenged by insufficient integration of patients' experience-based knowledge of everyday life and clinicians' profession-based knowledge.CONCLUSIONS: Goal-setting in rehabilitation is not the patients' need but they accept it as the clinicians' framework for rehabilitation. For goal-setting to become meaningful to patients with SCI, patient involvement should be strengthened by equally integrating the patients' perspectives in the goal-setting process.Implications for rehabilitationHealth-care professionals have to strengthen patient involvement in SCI rehabilitation by to a greater extent integrating the patients' knowledge of their everyday life and preferences rather than primarily focusing on profession-based knowledge.Health-care professionals must support patients in setting goals which are practically meaningful and relevant to the patients' everyday life and achievably and if needed go beyond the structured measurement of SMART goals.In an acknowledgement of the dynamic nature of goal-setting, clinicians should emphasise formulating goals in a flexible and non-directive manner, thereby providing room for patients' changing needs and challenges over time.Goals in SCI rehabilitation cover a wide range from broad, value-based goals to more specific goals, and the health-care professionals must ensure inclusion of such a wide range of goals.

To present the process used to develop the low back pain (LBP) assessment tool including evaluation of the initial content validity of the tool. The development process comprised the elements: definition of construct and content, literature search, item generation, needs assessment, piloting, adaptations, design, and technical production. The LBP assessment tool was developed to assess the construct “functioning and disability” as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Involvement of patients and health professionals was essential. The elements were collapsed into five steps. In total, 18 patients and 12 health professionals contributed to the content and the design of the tool. The LBP assessment tool covered all ICF components shared among 63 ICF categories. This study presents the process used to develop the LBP assessment tool, which is the first tool to address all ICF components and integrate biopsychosocial perspectives provided by patients and health professionals in the same tool. Initial evaluation of content validity showed adequate reflection of the construct “functioning and disability”. Further work on the way will evaluate comprehensiveness, acceptability, and degree of implementation of the LBP assessment tool to strengthen its use for clinical practice.Implications for RehabilitationA biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach is a strong foundation for identifying the many relevant aspects related to low back pain (LBP).Responding to a lack of tools to support a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach the LBP assessment tool was developed using a robust, multi-step process with involvement of patients and health professionals.The LBP assessment tool is a strong candidate for a user-friendly tool to facilitate use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in routine clinical practice. A biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach is a strong foundation for identifying the many relevant aspects related to low back pain (LBP). Responding to a lack of tools to support a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach the LBP assessment tool was developed using a robust, multi-step process with involvement of patients and health professionals. The LBP assessment tool is a strong candidate for a user-friendly tool to facilitate use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in routine clinical practice.

To evaluate comprehensiveness and acceptability of the patient-reported outcome instrument (PRO-LBP) and the clinician-reported outcome instrument (ClinRO-LBP) included in the low back pain (LBP) assessment tool. Second, to assess degree of implementation after three months. Feasibility-testing, training of health professionals, field-testing, and a feedback meeting was undertaken. Field-testing provided data to evaluate comprehensiveness, acceptability, and degree of implementation. Feasibility-testing and training of health professionals revealed that the LBP assessment tool was usable and ready for field-testing. In total, 152 patients participated in the field-testing of whom 95% considered the PRO-LBP comprehensive and 59% found it acceptable. Health professionals found the ClinRO-LBP comprehensive and acceptable. The feedback meeting revealed that the LBP assessment tool broadened the health professionals’ approach to functioning and facilitated a consultation based on the patient perspective. The degree of implementation reached 79%. The PRO-LBP and the ClinRO-LBP covered key concepts of LBP and were found acceptable by patients and health professionals. Despite the reduced degree of implementation after three months the LBP assessment tool allowed the health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patient-centred approach. Future research should investigate whether the LBP assessment can enhance patient-centred care.Implications for rehabilitationThe low back pain (LBP) assessment tool is the first evidence-based tangible tool to cover biopsychosocial aspects related to LBP as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).The LBP assessment tool allowed health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach and has the potential to be used in rehabilitation planning.Awareness to continuous facilitation and training of health professionals is important to facilitate and maintain implementation of new procedures into routine clinical practice. The low back pain (LBP) assessment tool is the first evidence-based tangible tool to cover biopsychosocial aspects related to LBP as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The LBP assessment tool allowed health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach and has the potential to be used in rehabilitation planning. Awareness to continuous facilitation and training of health professionals is important to facilitate and maintain implementation of new procedures into routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To test if the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale Extended (RCS-E) can be used as decision support for patient referral to primary rehabilitation as either complex specialized services (CSS) or district specialist services (DSS).METHOD: Two independent expert teams analyzed medical records on 299 consecutive patients admitted for CSS or DSS rehabilitation. One team provided a golden standard for the patient referrals, and the other team provided RCS-E scores. Models for predicting referrals from RCS-E scores were developed on data for 149 patients and tested on the remaining 150 patients.RESULTS: The optimal RCS-E sum score threshold for referral prediction was 11, predicting the golden standard for patient referral with sensitivity 88%, specificity 78% and correct classification rate 81%. Improved referral prediction performance was achieved by using RCS-E item-wise score thresholds (sensitivity 81%, specificity 89%, correct classification rate 87%). The RCS-E sum score range for patients referred CSS and DSS by the item-wise model was, respectively, 0-12 and 2-22 suggesting strong non-linear interaction of the RCS-E items.CONCLUSIONS: We found excellent referral decision support in the RCS-E and the item specific threshold model, when patients with acquired brain injury are to be referred to CSS or DSS as their primary rehabilitation. Implications for Rehabilitation Efficient rehabilitation after acquired brain injury requires rehabilitation settings that meet patient needs. Validated tools for referral decision support make the process more transparent. Patient rehabilitation complexity can be stratified by the RCS-E with high sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of positive test. RCS-E is an excellent tool for referral decision support.

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) into Danish and to establish the inter-tester reliability, responsiveness, Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and concurrent validity of the FMA-UE in a population of stroke patients.METHOD: The translation was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined by the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaption. Inter-rater reliability was assessed at baseline. Each patient was tested by two examiners and inter class correlation (ICC) was calculated. Responsiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics. The FMA-UE change score was used to assess sensitivity and specificity and to correctly determine which patients had improved. The MCID and the area under the curve (AUC) were established using the ROC. The FMA-UE's concurrent validity with the Motor Assessment Scale was determined using Spearman's rank correlation.SETTING: The study took place at Skive Neurorehabilition, Denmark from May 2014 to February 2015.PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients, who were in the acute to sub-acute stage of stroke and aged > 18 years.INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The FMA-UE.RESULTS: In 50 inpatients the ICC was 0.95, AUC was 0.87, with a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 89% and an MCID ≥ 4. Concurrent validity was high, with r = 0.94-0.95.CONCLUSION: The FMA-UE was successfully translated into Danish. An MCID ≥ 4 was found. This study provides evidence that the FMA-UE is a reliable, responsive and valid instrument for measuring upper limb impairment after stroke. Implications for rehabilitation One of the most widely recognized measures of upper extremity motor impairment post-stroke is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). The psychometric properties of a measurement depends on the population and setting in which it is used. In this study, the FMA-UE is translated into Danish and the psychometric properties of FMA-UE is determined in a Danish population of patients with stroke. The FMA-UE is now available to use for clinicians in Denmark.

Objective: To evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Danish version of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment, second edition (LOTCA-II/D), an instrument designed to assess and evaluate cognitive functioning. Methods: A reliability study was conducted at neurological acute care and rehabilitation units at three Danish hospitals. Fifty-four neurological patients participated in the study. Patients were tested with LOTCA-II/D by occupational therapists, and video recordings were made for reliability assessments. Intra-rater assessments were performed at least two weeks after the first assessment, and all occupational therapists were blinded to previous assessments. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using percentage agreement and weighted kappa. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, and floor and ceiling effects were evaluated by calculating the proportion of observations in minimum and maximum categories of subtests. Results: The results showed a lack of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and a large variation of agreement due to a substantial ceiling effect. Internal consistency was below the acceptable value in half of the cognitive areas. Conclusion: The study found that LOTCA-II/D is not reliable in acute clinical practice, and it could thus not be validated for use in this setting.

Nielsen LM, Maribo T, Kirkegaard H, et al. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2018;13:737–747. On page 737, the author affiliations were listed incorrectly. They should have been listed as follows: Louise Moeldrup Nielsen1–3Thomas Maribo4,5Hans Kirkegaard3Kirsten Schultz Petersen6Marianne Lisby3Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard1,4,7Read the original article&nbsp

Objective: To determine the absolute and relative reliability of intra-observer and interobserver measurements of postural balance using the One Leg Stand Test in patients with low back pain. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients with chronic low back pain advised to do exercise were included. A test protocol was established based on review of the literature and a pilot test. Patients were timed for their ability to stand on one leg with their eyes open and with eyes closed. After a 20-min break, the procedure was repeated to check for reproducibility. Results: Eyes open: a ceiling effect was seen as more than 48% of patients were able to stand for the maximum time, and no further analysis was done. Eyes closed: intra-observer reliability was tested in 21 patients; absolute reliability showed a standard error of the measurement (SEM) of 2.48 s and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of 6.88. The relative reliability was acceptable with an intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.86. Inte...