Search

Masahiro Shinoda,1 Osamu Hataji,2 Motohiko Miura,3 Masaharu Kinoshita,4 Akira Mizoo,5 Kazunori Tobino,6 Toru Soutome,7 Takanobu Nishi,7 Takeo Ishii,7 Bruce E Miller,8 Ruth Tal-Singer,8 Ryan Tomlinson,8 Taizo Matsuki,7 Paul W Jones,9 Yoko Shibata10 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan; 2Respiratory Center, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan; 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan; 4Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagata Hospital, Yanagawa, Fukuoka, Japan; 5Department of Pulmonary Medicine Japan, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan; 6Department of Respiratory Medicine, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan; 7Japan Medical & Development, GSK K.K, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan; 8GSK Pharma R&D, Collegeville, PA, USA; 9General Medicine, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK; 10Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JapanCorrespondence: Taizo Matsuki, Value Evidence Outcomes, Japan Medical & Development, GSK K.K, Akasaka Intercity AIR 1-8-1 Akasaka, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan, Tel +81-8036928935, Email taizo.2.matsuki@gsk.comBackground: Telemedicine may help the detection of symptom worsening in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), potentially resulting in improved outcomes. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine among patients with COPD and physicians and facility staff in Japan.Methods: This was a 52-week multicenter, prospective, single-arm, feasibility and acceptability cohort study of Japanese patients ≥ 40 years of age with COPD or asthma-COPD overlap. Participants underwent training to use YaDoc, a telemedicine smartphone App, which included seven daily symptom questions and weekly COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questions. The primary endpoint was participant compliance for required question completion. The secondary endpoint was participant and physician/facility staff acceptability of YaDoc based on questionnaires completed at Week 52. The impact of the Japanese COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency on results was also assessed.Results: Of the 84 participants enrolled (mean age: 68.7 years, 88% male), 72 participants completed the study. Completion was high in the first six months but fell after that. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) compliance for daily questionnaire entry was 66.6% (31.0– 91.8) and 81.0% (45.3– 94.3) for weekly CAT entry. Positive participant responses to the exit questionnaire were highest regarding YaDoc ease of use (83.8%), positive impact on managing health (58.8%), and overall satisfaction (53.8%). Of the 26 physicians and facility staff enrolled, 24 completed the study. Of these, the majority (66.7%) responded positively regarding app facilitation of communication between physicians and participants to manage disease. Compliance was similar before and after the first COVID-19 state of emergency in Japan.Conclusion: Daily telemedicine monitoring is potentially feasible and acceptable to both patients and physicians in the management of COPD. These results may inform potential use of telemedicine in clinical practice and design of future studies.Clinical Trial Registration: JapicCTI-194916.Keywords: Japan, patient-reported outcome measure, feasibility, acceptability, telemonitoring, smartphone

Purpose The Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) study demonstrated that single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduces moderate/severe exacerbation rates and improves lung function and health status versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in patients enrolled in Japan. Patients and methods IMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg with FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg in patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Endpoints included annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations (primary endpoint), time-to-first on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation and change from baseline at Week 52 in trough FEV1, post-bronchodilator FEV1, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and COPD Assessment Test score. Safety was also assessed. Results The Japan subgroup accounted for only 4% (378/10,355) of the overall IMPACT intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In the Japan subgroup, FF/UMEC/VI reduced the annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations by 15% (95% CI: -20, 40) versus FF/VI (compared with 15% [10, 20] in the ITT) and 36% (95% CI: 6, 57) versus UMEC/VI (compared with 25% [19, 30] in the ITT). FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation risk (time-to-first), improved lung function and health status at Week 52 versus both dual therapies. These results were in the same direction and of a generally similar magnitude to those seen in the overall ITT population. No new safety signals were identified in the Japan subgroup compared with the ITT population. Pneumonia incidence was higher with FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI versus UMEC/VI. Conclusion These results highlight the favorable benefit-risk profile of FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients in Japan with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year.

We evaluated variations in spirometric indices (i.e., forced vital capacity [FVC], peak expiratory flow [PEF], and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1]) and static respiratory muscle pressures (i.e., maximum static inspiratory pressure [PImax] and maximum static expiratory pressure [PEmax]) within a span of 12 hr in 60 healthy elderly subjects, 60 young subjects, and 30 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. There were no differences among data of FVC, PEF, FEV1, PImax, and PEmax on three separate occasions within a day in the elderly or the young. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) values of PEF and PImax on three occasions were 3.0 +/- 0.3% and 4.2 +/- 0.4% in the elderly, and 2.4 +/- 0.2% and 3.7 +/- 0.3% in the young, respectively. No subjects had more than 9% CV on each measurement in the study, suggesting that there is nosignificant daytime variation in measurement of expiratory flow and respiratory pressures in young and elderly people. However, FVC, PEF FEV1, and PImax values in the morning were smaller than those measured at the other two occasions in COPD patients. The results indicate that COPD affects diurnal variation in pulmonary function, but age alone has little impact on diurnal variation.

Takashi Motegi,1,2 Rupert C Jones,3 Takeo Ishii,1,2 Kumiko Hattori,1,2 Yuji Kusunoki,1,2 Ryuko Furutate,2 Kouich Yamada,1,2 Akihiko Gemma,1 Kozui Kida1,2 1Divisions of Pulmonary Medicine, Infectious Disease, and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, 2Respiratory Care Clinic, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; 3Respiratory Research Unit, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, UK Background: Prediction of future exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major concern for long-term management of this disease. Aim: To determine which of three multidimensional assessment systems (the body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity [BODE] index; dyspnea, obstruction, smoking, exacerbations [DOSE] index; or age, dyspnea, obstruction [ADO] index) is superior for predicting exacerbations. Methods: This was a 2-year prospective cohort study of COPD patients. Pulmonary function tests, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Modified Medical Respiratory Council (MMRC) dyspnea scores, chest computed-tomography measurements, and body composition were analyzed, and predictions of exacerbation by the three assessment systems were compared. Results: Among 183 patients who completed the study, the mean annual exacerbation rate was 0.57 events per patient year, which correlated significantly with lower predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (P < 0.001), lower transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (%DLco/VA) (P = 0.021), lesser 6MWD (P = 0.016), higher MMRC dyspnea score (P = 0.001), higher DOSE index (P < 0.001), higher BODE index (P = 0.001), higher ADO index (P = 0.001), and greater extent of emphysema (P = 0.002). For prediction of exacerbation, the areas under the curves were larger for the DOSE index than for the BODE and ADO indices (P < 0.001). Adjusted multiple logistic regression identified the DOSE index as a significant predictor of risk of COPD exacerbation. Conclusion: In this study, the DOSE index was a better predictor of exacerbations of COPD when compared with the BODE and ADO indices. Keywords: frequency of exacerbation, multidimensional assessment systems, DOSE index, BODE index A Letter to the Editor has been received and published for this article.

Ryuko Furutate1, Takeo Ishii1,2, Ritsuko Wakabayashi1, Takashi Motegi1,2, Kouichi Yamada1,2, Akihiko Gemma2, Kozui Kida1,21Respiratory Care Clinic, Nippon Medical School, Kudan-Minami, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JapanBackground: Previous studies have suggested links between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, and abdominal obesity. Although abdominal visceral fat is thought to be associated with cardiovascular risk factors, the degree of visceral fat accumulation in patients with COPD has not been directly studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the abdominal visceral fat accumulation and the association between visceral fat and the severity and changes in emphysema in COPD patients.Methods: We performed clinical and laboratory tests, including pulmonary function, dyspnea score, and the six-minute walking test in COPD patients (n = 101) and control, which included subjects with a smoking history but without airflow obstruction (n = 62). We used computed tomography to evaluate the abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and the extent of emphysema.Results: The COPD group had a larger VFA than the control group. The prevalence of non-obese subjects with an increased VFA was greater in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stages III and IV than in the other stages of COPD. The extent of emphysema was inversely correlated with waist circumference and SFA. However, VFA did not decrease with the severity of emphysema. VFA was positively correlated with the degree of dyspnea.Conclusion: COPD patients have excessive visceral fat, which is retained in patients with more advanced stages of COPD or severe emphysema despite the absence of obesity.Keywords: abdominal obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, visceral fat