1. Capturing outcomes of competency-based medical education: The call and the challenge
- Author
-
Lara Cooke, Elaine Van Melle, Jason R. Frank, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Brent Thoma, Benjamin Kinnear, Larry D. Gruppen, Andrew K. Hall, and Daniel J. Schumacher
- Subjects
Medical education ,Education, Medical ,020205 medical informatics ,Impact pathway ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Fidelity ,02 engineering and technology ,General Medicine ,Logic model ,Outcome (game theory) ,Competency-Based Education ,Outcomes evaluation ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Medical training ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Attribution ,Psychology ,Curriculum ,media_common - Abstract
There is an urgent need to capture the outcomes of the ongoing global implementation of competency-based medical education (CBME). However, the measurement of downstream outcomes following educational innovations, such as CBME is fraught with challenges stemming from the complexities of medical training, the breadth and variability of inputs, and the difficulties attributing outcomes to specific educational elements. In this article, we present a logic model for CBME to conceptualize an impact pathway relating to CBME and facilitate outcomes evaluation. We further identify six strategies to mitigate the challenges of outcomes measurement: (1) clearly identify the outcome of interest, (2) distinguish between outputs and outcomes, (3) carefully consider attribution versus contribution, (4) connect outcomes to the fidelity and integrity of implementation, (5) pay attention to unanticipated outcomes, and (6) embrace methodological pluralism. Embracing these challenges, we argue that careful and thoughtful evaluation strategies will move us forward in answering the all-important question: Are the desired outcomes of CBME being achieved?
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF