Search

There are a number of key characteristics of Ukrainian agriculture which are central to the discussion of the reform process. These include the predominance of state ownership and control, lack of commercial management skills, uneven commitment to reform in a decentralized system of responsibility, monopoly, a low level of technology and limited access to resources that facilitate efficient operation of the market. Necessary restructuring will involve three categories of measures including the establishment of a competitive environment, augmenting enterprise response, and macroeconomic stabilization. At present reform has proceeded extremely slowly and speeding the process appears to require Western aid, both financial and technical, to provide a demonstration of the benefits of reform in order to stimulate its more rapid uptake.

This paper explores the linkages between structural adjustment and the liberalization of agricultural marketing in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). It examines the nature of structural problems, which have been manifested in stagnating output and balance of payments difficulties. Policy responses are described, in terms of short term macroeconomic stabilization and longer term growth‐oriented adjustment policies. The process of structural adjustment in Africa is surveyed, and policies and stages in the liberalization of markets are considered. Debates on agricultural marketing in SSA are reviewed. This leads into an analysis of the specific issues which arise while marketing policy reform proceeds as an integral part of structural adjustment strategies.