Search

Following the advice [1] released by the Medical School Council in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical schools in the UK suspended all remaining clinical placements. Reasonably...

To determine the influence of deprivation on outcomes for patients with oesophageal cancer.A total of 1196 consecutive patients with oesophageal carcinoma presenting to a regional multidisciplinary team between 1 January 1998 and 31 August 2005 were studied prospectively and deprivation scores calculated using the Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) of the National Assembly for Wales. The patients were subdivided into quintiles for analysis.Inhabitants of the most deprived areas (quintile 5) were younger at presentation (median age 67 years versus 70 years, p = 0.01) and were more likely to have squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) (p = 0.002) in comparison with patients from the least deprived areas (quintile 1). Stage of disease and morbidity did not correlate with deprivation quintile, but operative mortality was greater in quintile 1 versus 5 (1.9% versus 5.8%, p = 0.281). Overall 5-year survival for those patients undergoing oesophagectomy was unrelated to deprivation quintile (1 versus 5, 24% versus 33%, p = 0.8246), but was lower following definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for the least deprived quintiles (1, 23 versus 45, 35% versus 16%, p = 0.0272).Although deprivation was associated with younger age, SCC and a trend towards higher operative mortality, survival after diagnosis and oesophagectomy were unrelated to deprivation.

Socio-economic deprivation has an influence on the outcome for patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal and bronchial cancer, but there are few data on its association with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of socio-economic deprivation on outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.Three hundred and thirty consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma presenting to a single hospital between 1 October 1995 and 30 June 2004 were studied prospectively and deprivation scores calculated using the National Assembly for Wales Indices of Multiple Deprivation. The patients were subdivided into quintiles for analysis.Inhabitants of the most deprived areas (quintile 5) were younger at presentation (median 70 years versus 74 years, p=0.007), and experienced longer delays in diagnosis (18 weeks versus 9 weeks, p=0.02) when compared with patients from the least deprived areas (quintile 1). Operative mortality was 3-fold higher for patients from the most deprived areas when compared with patients from less deprived areas (15% versus 5%, p=0.03). There was no correlation between stage of disease and socio-economic deprivation. For patients undergoing potentially curative surgery, the 5-year survival for patients from the most deprived areas was 32%, compared with 66% for patients from the least deprived areas (p=0.03).Socio-economic deprivation was associated with younger age at diagnosis, longer diagnostic delay, greater operative mortality and a shorter duration of survival following R0 gastrectomy. These poorer outcomes were not explained by the stage of disease at diagnosis.