1. Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions
- Author
-
Mark Beeman, Carola Salvi, John Kounios, Emanuela Bricolo, Edward M. Bowden, Salvi, C, Bricolo, E, Kounios, J, Bowden, E, and Beeman, M
- Subjects
Unconscious mind ,Process (engineering) ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Creativity ,Article ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Philosophy ,0302 clinical medicine ,problem solving ,insight ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Psychology (miscellaneous) ,Artificial intelligence ,Consciousness ,M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALE ,Psychology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,media_common ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
How accurate are insights compared to analytical solutions? In four experiments, we investigated how participants’ solving strategies influenced their solution accuracies across different types of problems, including one that was linguistic, one that was visual and two that were mixed visual-linguistic. In each experiment, participants’ self-judged insight solutions were, on average, more accurate than their analytic ones. We hypothesised that insight solutions have superior accuracy because they emerge into consciousness in an all-or-nothing fashion when the unconscious solving process is complete, whereas analytic solutions can be guesses based on conscious, prematurely terminated, processing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that participants’ analytic solutions included relatively more incorrect responses (i.e., errors of commission) than timeouts (i.e., errors of omission) compared to their insight responses.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF