Search

A simple device for three-dimensional recording of human movement was developed. It consisted of four rigid bars linked together by three joints. At each joint an optical transducer, connected to a PC computer via an electronic interface, measured the joint angle, rendering it possible to compute the displacement of one end (measuring end) relative to the other (reference end). This kinematic arm was validated (i) in static conditions; (ii) in dynamic conditions; and (iii) during human jumping. The measured error was 0·4%±0·5% (mean±s.d.) on distance measurements in static conditions, 0·l%± 1·6% on 0·57 m.s−1 rotation velocity measurements and 3·2% ±3·3% on 3·56 m.s−2 rotation acceleration measurements, and l·6%±20·7% on force measurements during human jumping. These error values are equivalent to or lower than errors linked to tracking systems or to film or video analysis. Therefore, if the movement is not disturbed by the spatial limitation due to the mechanical link with the measuring end, the kinemati...

This study was designed to discriminate, according to their accuracy, between eight pulse oximeters (PO) using a realistic evaluation performed by means of a moderate exercise to provide artefacts and thus represent a typical clinical situation. Accuracy was assessed by calculating error on saturation (EOS) as the difference between simultaneous measurement of non-invasive (SpO2) and invasive functional (SfO2) arterial blood oxygen saturation. An index of homogeneity of EOS (InH), calculated using a Lehmann analysis, was chosen as a representative of error dispersion, leading to a statistical classification; the influence on error introduced by the drift of EOS with SfO2 was thus eliminated. We obtained a clear-cut separation of the eight PO (Datex Satlite (DA), Kontron 7840 (KO), Nellcor 200 (NE), Novametrix 505 (NO), Ohmeda 3700 (OH), PPG-Hellige (PP), Physiocontrol 1600 (PH), and Radiometer Oxi (RA] into two statistically different subgroups by comparing their InH standard deviation (SD). There is a highly statistically significant difference between the accuracy measured for the high precision subgroup with an InH SD ranging from +/- 1.6 to +/- 1.9% SaO2 (DA, PH, and RA), and that measured for the low precision subgroup whose InH SD ranges from +/- 2.8 to +/- 5.0% SaO2 (NE, OH, NO, KO, PP). These results suggest that, in our clinical conditions, there is a wide range of inhomogeneity of error from one PO to another. The error introduced by the drift of EOS with SfO2 should be considered separately.

Using the new method of sample preparation developed by the manufacturer in 1979, the lactate analyser LA 640 now provides reliable measurements of blood lactic acid from blood micro-samples of 20 microliters within 2 min. Reproducibility is comparable to that obtained by spectrophotometric assay with +/- 0.2 mmol . l-1 for 95% confidence limits. High accuracy was also obtained with 95% linked confidence limits within +/- 0.19 mmol . l-1 and +/- 0.46 mmol . l-1 for blood lactate concentrations of from 2-4 and 7-9 mmol . l-1 respectively. Due to a lactate concentration increase of 0.5 mmol . l-1 . h-1 in whole blood kept at 20 degrees C, the blood must be immediately diluted in the buffer haemolysing solution after withdrawal. This diluted sample can then be stored at room temperature without alteration, provided the concentration in the dilution is lower than 0.8 mmol . l-1. For serial successive measurements, a new sample can be tested before the electrode current reaches its background value.