Search

The MYC oncogene is upregulated in human cancers by translocation, amplification, and mutation of cellular pathways that regulate Myc. Myc/Max heterodimers bind to E box sequences in the promoter regions of genes and activate transcription., The MYC oncogene is upregulated in human cancers by translocation, amplification, and mutation of cellular pathways that regulate Myc. Myc/Max heterodimers bind to E box sequences in the promoter regions of genes and activate transcription. The MYC inhibitor Omomyc can reduce the ability of MYC to bind specific box sequences in promoters of MYC target genes by binding directly to E box sequences as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP). Here, we demonstrate by both a proximity ligation assay (PLA) and double chromatin immunoprecipitation (ReCHIP) that Omomyc preferentially binds to Max, not Myc, to mediate inhibition of MYC-mediated transcription by replacing MYC/MAX heterodimers with Omomyc/MAX heterodimers. The formation of Myc/Max and Omomyc/Max heterodimers occurs cotranslationally; Myc, Max, and Omomyc can interact with ribosomes and Max RNA under conditions in which ribosomes are intact. Taken together, our data suggest that the mechanism of action of Omomyc is to bind DNA as either a homodimer or a heterodimer with Max that is formed cotranslationally, revealing a novel mechanism to inhibit the MYC oncogene. We find that in vivo, Omomyc distributes quickly to kidneys and liver and has a short effective half-life in plasma, which could limit its use in vivo.

The mouse factor Zif268, known also as early growth response protein EGR-1, is a classical representative for the Cys2His2 transcription factor family. It is required for binding the RNA polymerase with operator dsDNA to initialize the transcription process. We have shown that only in this family of total six Zn-finger protein families the Zn complex plays a significant role in the protein-DNA binding. Electrostatic feature of this complex in the binding of factor Zif268 from Mus musculus with operator DNA has been considered. The factor consists of three similar Zn-finger units which bind with triplets of coding DNA. Essential contacts of the factor with the DNA phosphates are formed by three conservative His residues, one in each finger. We describe here the results of calculations of the electrostatic potentials for the Zn-Cys2His2 complex, Zn-finger unit 1, and the whole transcription factor. The potential of Zif268 has a positive area on the factor surface, and it corresponds exactly to the binding sites of each of Zn-finger units. The main part of these areas is determined by conservative His residues, which form contacts with the DNA phosphate groups. Our result shows that the electrostatic positive potential of this histidine residue is enhanced due to the Zn complex. The other contacts of the Zn-finger with DNA are related to nucleotide bases, and they are responsible for the sequence-specific binding with DNA. This result may be extended to all other members of the Cys2His2 transcription factor family.

The circadian rhythm generated by circadian clock underlies a molecular mechanism of rhythmic transcriptional regulation by transcription factor BMAL1/CLOCK. Importantly, the circadian clock is coordinated by exogenous cues to accommodate to changes in the external environment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which intracellular-signaling pathways mediate the adjustments of the circadian transcriptional rhythms remain unclear. In this study, we found that pharmacological inhibition or shRNA-mediated knockdown of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) blocked upregulation of Dbp mRNA induced by serum shock in NIH 3T3 cells. Moreover, the inhibition of PI3K significantly reduced the promoter activity of the Dbp gene, as well as decreased the recruitment of BMAL1/CLOCK to the E-box in the Dbp promoter. Interestingly, the inhibition of PI3K blocked heterodimerization of BMAL1 and CLOCK. Our findings suggest that PI3K signaling plays a modulatory role in the regulation of the transcriptional rhythm of the Dbp gene by targeting BMAL1 and CLOCK.

Organisms adapt their physiology and behavior to the 24-h day-night cycle to which they are exposed. On a cellular level, this is regulated by intrinsic transcriptional-translational feedback loops that are important for maintaining the circadian rhythm. These loops are organized by members of the core clock network, which further regulate transcription of downstream genes, resulting in their circadian expression. Despite progress in understanding circadian gene expression, only a few players involved in circadian transcriptional regulation, including transcription factors, epigenetic regulators, and long noncoding RNAs, are known. Aiming to discover such genes, we performed a high-coverage transcriptome analysis of a circadian time course in murine fibroblast cells. In combination with a newly developed algorithm, we identified many transcription factors, epigenetic regulators, and long intergenic noncoding RNAs that are cyclically expressed. In addition, a number of these genes also showed circadian expression in mouse tissues. Furthermore, the knockdown of one such factor, Zfp28, influenced the core clock network. Mathematical modeling was able to predict putative regulator-effector interactions between the identified circadian genes and may help for investigations into the gene regulatory networks underlying circadian rhythms.

Genes from yeast to mammals are frequently subject to non-coding transcription of their antisense strand; however the genome-wide role for antisense transcription remains elusive. As transcription influences chromatin structure, we took a genome-wide approach to assess which chromatin features are associated with nascent antisense transcription, and contrast these with features associated with nascent sense transcription. We describe a distinct chromatin architecture at the promoter and gene body specifically associated with antisense transcription, marked by reduced H2B ubiquitination, H3K36 and H3K79 trimethylation and increased levels of H3 acetylation, chromatin remodelling enzymes, histone chaperones and histone turnover. The difference in sense transcription between genes with high or low levels of antisense transcription is slight; thus the antisense transcription-associated chromatin state is not simply analogous to a repressed state. Using mutants in which the level of antisense transcription is reduced at GAL1, or altered genome-wide, we show that non-coding transcription is associated with high H3 acetylation and H3 levels across the gene, while reducing H3K36me3. Set1 is required for these antisense transcription-associated chromatin changes in the gene body. We propose that nascent antisense and sense transcription have fundamentally distinct relationships with chromatin, and that both should be considered canonical features of eukaryotic genes.

Circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (Clock) gene is a core gene in the circadian rhythm system that is involved in cancer cell proliferation. However, the molecular mechanism of Clock gene participate in the cancer cell proliferation is unclear. Previous studies demonstrated that cell proliferation could be regulated by the canonical Wnt pathway (also known as the Wnt/β-catenin pathway), and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway had a relation with the circadian system. To investigate whether the Clock gene affects the proliferation of breast cancer cell by regulating the expression of β-catenin, we knocked down the Clock expression of mouse breast cancer cells (4T1) by RNA interference. Then detected their proliferation rates using CCK8 assay and the expression of the β-catenin gene by real-time PCR and Western blot. The results showed that the proliferation of the Clock knocked down 4T1 cells is slower than the control. The expression level of β-catenin of these 4T1 cells is reduced. Our study showed that Clock...

Interferons regulate immunity by inducing DNA binding of the transcription factor STAT1 through Y701 phosphorylation. Transcription by STAT1 needs to be restricted to minimize the adverse effects of prolonged immune responses. It remains unclear how STAT1 inactivation is regulated such that the transcription output is adequate. Here we show that efficient STAT1 inactivation in macrophages is coupled with processive transcription. Ongoing transcription feeds back to reduce the promoter occupancy of STAT1 and, consequently, the transcriptional output. Once released from the promoter, STAT1 is ultimately inactivated by Y701 dephosphorylation. We observe similar regulation for STAT2 and STAT3, suggesting a conserved inactivation mechanism among STATs. These findings reveal that STAT1 promoter occupancy in macrophages is regulated such that it decreases only after initiation of the transcription cycle. This feedback control ensures the fidelity of cytokine responses and provides options for pharmacological intervention.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells express pluripotency-associated genes and repress differentiation-inducible genes. The activities of these genes are coordinately reversed during differentiation. The changes in the transcriptome upon conditional KAP1 knockout in ES cells overlapped with the changes during embryoid body formation. KAP1 repressed differentiation-inducible genes and derepressed pluripotency-associated genes in ES cells. KAP1 formed complexes with polycomb repressive complexes 1 (PRC1) through an interaction that was mediated by the KAP1 coiled-coil region. KAP1 and PRC1 bound cooperatively at the promoters of differentiation-inducible genes and repressed their transcription. In contrast, KAP1 bound the transcribed and flanking sequences of pluripotency-associated genes, did not enhance PRC1 binding, and derepressed their transcription. KAP1 had opposite effects on differentiation-inducible and pluripotency-associated gene transcription both in ES cells and in differentiating embryoid bodies. The region of KAP1 that mediated the interaction with PRC1 was required for KAP1 enhancement of PRC1 binding and for KAP1 repression of transcription at differentiation-inducible promoters. This region of KAP1 was not required for KAP1 suppression of PRC1 binding or for KAP1 derepression of transcription at pluripotency-associated promoters. The opposite effects of KAP1 on the transcription of differentiation-inducible versus pluripotency-associated genes contributed to the reciprocal changes in their transcription during differentiation.

Enterobacteria such as Escherichia coli are able to survive under various environments within host animals by changes of the expression pattern of its genome. The selective expression of genes in its genome takes place by controlling the promoter recognition properties of RNA polymerase by protein-protein interplays with transcription factors. In this review, I describe the regulatory network formed by the metal-sensing transcription factors in E. coli. Comprehensive analyses identify the set of regulation targets for a total of 13 metal-response transcription factors, indicating that nine species of transcription factors are local regulators while four species of transcription factors are global regulators. The signal transduction pathways for these metal-response regulons show not only the complex cross-talks but also the hierarchic multi-regulatory network. This regulatory network seems to play a role for E. coli survival to colonize in a large intestine within host animals.

Nascent untranslated transcripts in bacteria are prone to generating RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops); Rho-dependent transcription termination acts to reduce their prevalence. Here we discuss the mechanisms of R-loop formation and growth inhibition in bacteria.

Host cell factor-1(HCF-1) was first discovered as a cellular cofactor in the VP16-induced complex, a multi-protein DNA complex that forms on immediate early gene promoters of herpes simplex virus (HSV) to activate viral gene transcription. Subsequent research has revealed HCF-1 to be an abundant chromatin-associated protein that regulates various stages of the cell cycle. Recent reports show that HCF-1 interacts with diverse E2F proteins to induce cell-cycle-specific transcription. HCF-1 can act as a scaffold to a variety of histone-modifying proteins and these HCF-1-E2F-containing multi-protein complexes can bring about context-dependent activation or repression of transcription. In this review we examine the diversity of HCF-E2F interactions and the variety of multi-protein complexes it occurs in, to influence the local chromatin landscape at the E2F-promoters.

Eukaryotic cells limit ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (RNAP-I) to maintain genome integrity. African trypanosomes present an excellent model for studies on RNAP-I regulation because they possess a bifunctional RNAP-I and because RNAP-II transcription appears unregulated. Since Elp3, the catalytic component of Elongator, controls RNAP-II transcription in yeast and human cells, we predicted a role for a trypanosome Elp3-related protein, ELP3a or ELP3b, in RNAP-I regulation. elp3b null and conditional strains specifically exhibited resistance to a transcription elongation inhibitor, suggesting that ELP3b negatively impacts elongation. Nascent RNA analysis and expression of integrated reporter cassettes supported this interpretation and revealed negative control of rDNA transcription. ELP3b specifically localized to the nucleolus, and ELP3b loss rendered cells hypersensitive to DNA damage and to translation inhibition, suggesting that anti-Elongator function was important to maintain genome integrity rather than to modulate ribosome production. Finally, ELP3b displayed discrimination between RNAP-I compartments in the same cell. Our results establish ELP3b as a major negative regulator of rDNA transcription and extend the roles of the Elp3-related proteins to RNAP-I transcription units. ELP3b is also the first trypanosome protein shown to distinguish between rDNA and variant surface glycoprotein transcription within different RNAP-I compartments.

Muscle wasting in patients with sepsis, severe injury, and cancer is associated with increased transcription of several genes regulating different proteolytic pathways. The involvement of gene activation in muscle wasting suggests that transcription factors and nuclear cofactors play important roles in the regulation of muscle mass. Among transcription factors, NF-κB, C/EBPβ, and FOXO transcription factors are activated in atrophying muscle and stimulate the transcription of genes in the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway, as well as genes regulating authophagy/lysosomal proteolysis. Changes in the expression and activity of several nuclear cofactors, including the histone acetyltransferase p300, histone deacetylases (HDACs), such as HDAC3, HDAC6, and SIRT1, as well as the nuclear cofactors PGC-1α and β, contribute to loss of muscle mass in various catabolic conditions. The activity of transcription factors and nuclear cofactors involved in the regulation of muscle mass is influenced not only by their abundance, but also by posttranslational modifications as well, including ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and acetylation. Transcription factors and nuclear cofactors involved in muscle wasting interact with each other at multiple levels, supporting the concept that the molecular regulation of muscle mass in various catabolic conditions is complex. An increased understanding of molecules that modulate gene transcription in catabolic muscle may make it possible to develop treatments targeting transcription factors and nuclear cofactors in the prevention and treatment of muscle wasting.

Circadian clocks can be entrained by light-dark or temperature cycles. In the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, 12h changes in temperature between 18°C and 28°C synchronize its clock. Both subunits of the circadian RNA-binding protein CHLAMY1, named C1 and C3, are able to integrate temperature information. C1 gets hyper-phosphorylated in cells grown at 18°C and the level of C3 is up-regulated at this temperature. In the long period mutant per1, where temperature entrainment is disturbed, the temperature-dependent regulation of C1 and C3 is altered. Up-regulation of C3 at the low temperature is mediated predominantly by an E-box element situated in its promoter region. This cis-acting element is also relevant for circadian expression of c3 as well as of its up-regulation in cells, where C1 is overexpressed. Among the few identified factors interacting with the E-box region, C3 is also present, suggesting that it feedbacks on its own transcription.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in cancer-related inflammation, acts as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor, which promotes angiogenesis, metastasis, and subversion of immunity, and changes the response to hormones and to chemotherapeutics. We explored transcription mechanisms involved in differential IL-6 gene expression in breast cancer cells with different metastatic properties. In weakly metastatic MCF7 cells, histone H3 K9 methylation, HP1 binding, and weak recruitment of AP-1 Fra-1/c-Jun, NF-kappaB p65 transcription factors, and coactivators is indicative of low chromatin accessibility and gene transcription at the IL-6 gene promoter. In highly metastatic MDA-MB231 cells, strong DNase, MNase, and restriction enzyme accessibility, as well potent constitutive transcription of the IL-6 gene promoter, coincide with increased H3 S10 K14 phosphoacetylation and promoter enrichment of AP-1 Fra-1/c-Jun and NF-kappaB p65 transcription factors and MSK1, CBP/p300, Brg1, and Ezh2 cofactors. Complementation, silencing, and kinase inhibitor experiments further demonstrate involvement of AP-1 Fra-1/c-Jun and NF-kappaB p65/RelB members, but not of the alpha estrogen receptor in promoting chromatin accessibility and transcription across the IL-6 gene promoter in metastatic breast cancer cells. Finally, the natural withanolide Withaferin A was found to repress IL-6 gene transcription in metastatic breast cancer cells upon dual inhibition of NF-kappaB and AP-1 Fra-1 transcription factors and silencing of IL-6 promoter chromatin accessibility.

In mammalian circadian clockwork, the CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimer activates E-box-dependent transcription, while its activity is suppressed by circadian binding with negative regulators, such as CRYs. Here, we found that the CLOCK protein is kept mostly in the phosphorylated form throughout the day and is partly hyperphosphorylated in the suppression phase of E-box-dependent transcription in the mouse liver and NIH 3T3 cells. Coexpression of CRY2 in NIH 3T3 cells inhibited the phosphorylation of CLOCK, whereas CIPC coexpression markedly stimulated phosphorylation, indicating that CLOCK phosphorylation is regulated by a combination of the negative regulators in the suppression phase. CLOCK-BMAL1 purified from the mouse liver was subjected to tandem mass spectrometry analysis, which identified Ser38, Ser42, and Ser427 as in vivo phosphorylation sites of CLOCK. Ser38Asp and Ser42Asp mutations of CLOCK additively and markedly weakened the transactivation activity of CLOCK-BMAL1, with downregulation of the nuclear amount of CLOCK and the DNA-binding activity. On the other hand, CLOCK Delta 19, lacking the CIPC-binding domain, was far less phosphorylated and much more stabilized than wild-type CLOCK in vivo. Calyculin A treatment of cultured NIH 3T3 cells promoted CLOCK phosphorylation and facilitated its proteasomal degradation. Together, these results show that CLOCK phosphorylation contributes to the suppression of CLOCK-BMAL1-mediated transactivation through dual regulation: inhibition of CLOCK activity and promotion of its degradation.

Although Bmal1 is a key component of the mammalian clock system, little is understood about the actual mechanism of circadian Bmal1 gene transcription, particularly at the chromatin level. Here we discovered a unique chromatin structure within the Bmal1 promoter. The RORE region, which is a critical cis element for the circadian regulation of the Bmal1 gene, is comprised of GC-rich open chromatin. The 3'-flanking region of the promoter inhibited rhythmic transcription in the reporter gene assay in vitro even in the presence of RORalpha and REV-ERBalpha. We also found that the nuclear matrix protein SAF-A binds to the 3'-flanking region with circadian timing, which was correlated with Bmal1 expression by footprinting in vivo. These results suggest that the unique chromatin structure containing SAF-A is required for the circadian transcriptional regulation of the Bmal1 gene in cells.

The RNA polymerase II transcription machinery acts as a molecular motor that traverses large parts of the genome on a regular basis. It has been suggested that the transcription machinery may play an important role in sensing DNA damage and activating DNA repair and stress response pathways when stalled at blocking lesions. We have collectively termed the activation of these different pathways as the transcription stress response. Recently, it was shown that the ATR kinase and the single-strand DNA-binding protein RPA mediate the phosphorylation of p53 following blockage of transcription elongation. This ATR-mediated phosphorylation occurs even when transcription elongation is blocked in the absence of DNA damage, suggesting that ATR and RPA senses the consequences of blocked transcription elongation rather than sensing DNA lesions directly. It is proposed that the transcription stress response activated by blockage of transcription may play an important role in safeguarding the genome from DNA damage and thus act to suppress tumorigenesis.

The stem cell phenotype of human and murine ES cells has recently been shown to be maintained by a self-stabilizing network of transcription factors, NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2. These factors maintain their own and each other's transcription, activating, by combinatorial interactions, genes responsible for the ES cell phenotype while repressing genes required for differentiation. This 'core circuitry' interacts with an 'expanded circuitry' encompassing signal transduction and chromatin regulator proteins. During ES cell differentiation the crucial transcription factors are down-regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation. Aberrant activation of the ES transcription factor network elicited by increased dosage of an embryonic gene cluster at 12p including NANOG, together with additional genetic and epigenetic alterations, appears to be a crucial event in the genesis of testicular germ cell cancers. Intriguingly, the ES cell transcription factor network fits current as well as past definitions of 'epigenetic'.

CLOCK and BMAL1 are bHLH-PAS-containing transcription factors that bind to E-box elements and are indispensable for expression of core circadian clock components such as the Per and Cry genes. A key step in expression is the heterodimerization of CLOCK and BMAL1 and their accumulation in the nucleus with an approximately 24-h periodicity. We show here that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BMAL1 is essential for transactivation and for degradation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer. Using serial deletions and point mutants, we identified a functional nuclear localization signal and Crm1-dependent nuclear export signals in BMAL1. Transient-transfection experiments revealed that heterodimerization of CLOCK and BMAL1 accelerates their turnover, as well as E-box-dependent clock gene transcription. Moreover, in embryonic mouse fibroblasts, robust transcription of Per2 is tightly associated with massive degradation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer. CRY proteins suppressed this process during the transcription-negative phase and led to nuclear accumulation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer. Thus, these findings suggest that the decrease of BMAL1 abundance during the circadian cycle reflects robust transcriptional activation of clock genes rather than inhibition of BMAL1 synthesis.

Two major interconnected feedback loops govern circadian rhythmicity in mammals. The transcriptional activators BMAL1/MOP3 and CLOCK drive one loop by binding to E-box motifs in the regulatory regions of circadian target genes. Time-of-day-dependent inhibition of the activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK by PERIOD (PER) and CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) proteins provokes consequent rhythmic gene expression. In this fashion, the Per and Cry genes can feedback onto their own synthesis. The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erbalpha manifests the second feedback loop. Genetically linked to the molecular oscillator, it was identified as a repressor of the Bmal1 and Clock genes. In an attempt to understand the circadian regulation of the mouse Rev-erbalpha gene, we developed a screening technique for BMAL1 and CLOCK binding regions consisting of chromatin-immunoprecipitation. Here we show that the mouse Rev-erbalpha gene contains at least two binding regions for the transcriptional activators close to its previously identified promoter region and in its first intron. However, our data also indicate that not all potential E-box motifs in vitro are occupied in vivo.

Transcriptional regulation for the genes encoding alpha- and beta-chains of the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcepsilonRI) have been analyzed in mast cells and regulatory mechanisms are beginning to be elucidated. Transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1 cooperatively transactivate the alpha-chain gene, and three transcription factors, GATA-1, Oct-1, and MZF-1, are involved in regulation of beta-chain gene expression. No single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are functionally related to the allergic diseases have been identified in coding regions of the alpha- and beta-chain genes in a definitive way. However, recent studies on SNPs in the promoter regions have revealed that these genes are probable candidates for new types of allergy-related genes whose transcription levels are affected by transcription factors which discriminate SNPs in the promoters. Another interesting finding on transcription factors functioning in mast cells is that the expression level of PU.1 determines cell fate between mast cells and monocytes.

A temporal gradient of the novel nuclear protein LIN-14 specifies the timing and sequence of stage-specific developmental events in Caenorhabditis elegans. The profound effects of lin-14 mutations on worm development suggest that LIN-14 directly or indirectly regulates stage-specific gene expression. We show that LIN-14 can associate with chromatin in vivo and has in vitro DNA binding activity. A bacterially expressed C-terminal domain of LIN-14 was used to select DNA sequences that contain a putative consensus binding site from a pool of randomized double-stranded oligonucleotides. To identify candidates for genes directly regulated by lin-14, we employed DNA microarray hybridization to compare the mRNA abundance of C. elegans genes in wild-type animals to that in mutants with reduced or elevated lin-14 activity. Five of the candidate LIN-14 target genes identified by microarrays, including the insulin/insulin-like growth factor family gene ins-33, contain putative LIN-14 consensus sites in their upstream DNA sequences. Genetic analysis indicates that the developmental regulation of ins-33 mRNA involves the stage-specific repression of ins-33 transcription by LIN-14 via sequence-specific DNA binding. These results reinforce the conclusion that lin-14 encodes a novel class of transcription factor.

The p53 tumor suppressor protein functions via specific gene activation to inhibit passage through the cell cycle and to trigger apoptosis. The p53 protein is homologous to p63 and p73, proteins that regulate transcription via the same promoter sequences but which activate different genes. In this study we tested whether p53, p63, and p73 have different mechanisms of activating transcription and if such a difference could explain how each factor stimulates the transcription of distinct sets of genes. We found that when comparing p53 to the transcriptional activator, GAL4-VP16, both of which are classified as acidic activators, that stimulation of transcription by p53 is dependent upon low Mg2+ concentrations and limiting amounts of extract. By comparison, the stimulation of RNA synthesis by GAL4-VP16 was not dependent on a specific concentration of Mg2+ but did require higher amounts of extract, suggesting that a certain factor not required for p53-dependent gene activation was limiting in the extract. In contrast to the differences between p53 and GAL4-VP16, p63 and p73 both regulated transcription in vitro under similar conditions as did p53. All three proteins, purified to near homogeneity, were equally active in binding to the p53-response element, and equally active in stimulating transcription reactions using naked DNA templates, DNA templates reconstituted in chromatin using histones purified from HeLa cells, or hyper-acetylated histones. These results argue that the gene specificity of p63 and p73 dependent activation of transcription depends upon specific coactivators present in the specific cell types and upon other factors bound to the promoters.

International audience; The rat tyrosine hydroxylase gene promoter contains an E-box/dyad motif and an octameric and heptameric element that may be recognized by classes of transcription factors highly expressed during nervous system development. In a one-hybrid genetic screen, we used these sites as targets to isolate cDNAs encoding new transcription factors present in the brain. We identified ZENON, a novel rat POZ protein that contains two clusters of Kruppel-like zinc fingers and that presents several features of a transcription factor. ZENON is found in nuclei following transient transfection with the cDNA. The N-terminal zinc finger cluster contains a DNA binding domain that interacts with the E box. Cotranfection experiments revealed that ZENON induces tyrosine hydroxylase promoter activity. Unlike other POZ proteins, the ZENON POZ domain is not required for either activation of transcription or self-association. In the embryonic neural tube, ZENON expression is restricted to neurons that have already achieved mitosis and are engaged in late stages of neuronal differentiation (late postmitotic neurons). ZENON neuronal expression persists in the adult brain; therefore, ZENON can be considered a marker of mature neurons. We propose that ZENON is involved in the maintenance of panneuronal features and/or in the survival of mature neurons.

Transcription of the gene for PEPCK-C occurs in a number of mammalian tissues, with highest expression occurring in the liver, kidney cortex, and white and brown adipose tissue. Several hormones and other factors, including glucagon, epinephrine, insulin, glucocorticoids and metabolic acidosis, control this process in three responsive tissues, liver, adipose tissue, and kidney cortex. Expression of the gene in these three tissues in regulated in a different manner, responding to the specific physiological role of the tissue. The PEPCK-C gene promoter has been extensively studied and a number of regulatory regions identified that bind key transcription factors and render the gene responsive to hormonal and dietary stimuli. This review will focus on the control of transcription for the gene, with special emphasis on our current understanding of the transcription factors that are involved in the response of PEPCK-C gene in specific tissues. We have also reviewed the biological function of PEPCK-C in each of the tissues discussed in this review, in order to place the control of PEPCK-C gene transcription in the appropriate physiological context. Because of its extraordinary importance in mammalian metabolism and its broad pattern of tissue-specific expression, the PEPCK-C gene has become a model for studying the biological basis of the control of gene transcription.

To localize the regulatory elements in the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSH-R) promoter/enhancer and to determine the role of upstream stimulatingfactors (USFs) in these elements, we transiently transfected constructs of FSH-R promoter/enhancer in pGL3 luciferase reporter plasmids into Chinese hamster ovary cells and the activities were determined by measuring luciferase luminescence of the cell lysates. The 5'-flanking regions of the human FSH-R gene from nt -1485 to -1 with respect to the gene translation start site were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subcloned in pGL3. Deletion mutants were created using PCR or restriction enzyme digestion. Mutation in the E-box sequence from nt -124 to -119 (E-box 3), in the construct from -224 to nt -1 or in the Inr element, which encompasses the transcriptional start site at nt -99, resulted in a substantial reduction in the human FSH-R promoter/enhancer activity. Overexpression of upstream stimulating factor-1 (USF1) suppresses the activity of the human FSH-R promoter/enhancer via Inr and E-box elements. Upstream stimulating factor-2 (USF2) decreases FSH-R promoter/enhancer activity by acting on E-box 3. The results indicate that E-box 3 and the Inr element are important elements of the human FSH-R promoter/ enhancer. USF family members inhibit FSH-R gene activity by acting via these elements. USF1 and USF2 suppress human FSH-R promoter/enhancer activity by acting on E-box 3. USF1 also decreases activity by interacting with the Inr element.

Hox factors are evolutionarily conserved homeodomain-containing transcription factors that are critical for the determination of the body plan during early development and for the regulation of key differentiation-specific genes that determine cellular specificity. Proper spatial and temporal expression of Hox factors is required to orchestrate anterior-posterior segmentation, limb development, and organogenesis. Hox proteins regulate gene transcription by a well-coordinated and tightly regulated balance of gene activation and repression. In particular, the addition and refinement of repression domains have contributed to the evolutionary diversification of body segmentation (15, 37). Pancreatic-duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX-1; also known as IPF-1, IDX-1, STF-1, Xlhbox8, GSF, and IUF-1) is a Hox-type homeodomain protein encoded by a gene in the ParaHox cluster that is expressed in the region of the developing foregut that later becomes the duodenum, distal stomach, and pancreas (5, 24, 28, 29, 32, 46). As development proceeds, high-level PDX-1 expression is eventually restricted to the hormone-producing β and δ cells of the fully developed endocrine pancreas, whereas lower levels of expression are detected in certain ductal cells, the majority of exocrine acinar cells, and epithelial cells and Brunner's glands in the distal stomach and proximal duodenum. In the differentiated endocrine pancreas, PDX-1 regulates the transcription of important target genes, including the insulin, somatostatin, and glucose transporter 2 genes (reviewed in reference 14). Gene dosage has a marked influence on the phenotype of Pdx-1 mutations. Homozygous disruption of the Pdx-1 gene results in pancreatic agenesis in both mice and humans (23, 39), whereas heterozygous truncation and missense Pdx-1 (Ipf-1) mutations are associated with both early (MODY4)- and late-onset forms of type 2 diabetes in humans (18, 26, 40). Heterozygous Pdx1+/− mice exhibit glucose intolerance, impaired secretagogue-induced insulin secretion in vivo, abnormal islet architecture, increased islet apoptosis, and, in older mice, decreased β cell mass (4, 12, 22). Mice in which Pdx-1 is specifically inactivated in islet β cells by Cre-LoxP recombination develop diabetes with decreased insulin and Glut 2 expression and an increased proportion of α cells in the islets (1). Recent mouse models allowing conditional regulation of Pdx-1 expression also demonstrate the key role of proper levels of Pdx-1 expression throughout embryonic development and adult life (19, 43). PDX-1 is a 283-amino-acid (aa) protein with a central homeodomain flanked by proline-rich N- and C-terminal domains (24, 29). A transactivation domain maps to the N terminus in the context of insulin and somatostatin gene transcription, and deletion of the N terminus results in a dominant negative PDX-1 protein (25, 33). The functional synergy of PDX-1 with E box proteins, such as E12 and E47, to activate insulin gene transcription is mediated by the N terminus (33), and glucose augments PDX-1 transactivation via the N terminus as well (35). The coactivator CBP physically interacts with the N terminus (2). PDX-1 interacts with the homeoprotein PBX1 through a conserved pentapeptide motif, FPWMK, located N terminal to the homeodomain; this interaction is important for the proper proliferation and expansion of all of the differentiated cell types of the pancreas (13). Depending on the alternatively spliced isoform of PBX1 that is involved, corepressors may be recruited to the PDX-1/PBX1 heterodimer complex (2). The PDX-1 homeodomain contains the DNA binding domain as well as an atypical nuclear localization signal (30). Human mutations in the C-terminal region of PDX-1 are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, emphasizing the functional importance of this region in vivo (18, 44). However, in contrast to the function of the N terminus and the homeodomain, that of the well-conserved C terminus is poorly understood. The available data support both repressive and activating roles for these sequences. C-terminal truncation of PDX-1 is associated with increased synergy with E47 on the insulin promoter (33). The PDX-1 C terminus also confers inhibition in the context of fusion to the heterologous Gal4 DNA binding domain (34, 38). In contrast, on the somatostatin TAAT1 enhancer, the PDX-1 C terminus may also contain a cryptic transactivation domain (25, 33). To gain insight into the role of the PDX-1 C terminus, we investigated it as a protein-protein interaction domain by yeast two-hybrid analysis. We identified a nuclear POZ domain protein that we named PCIF1 (PDX-1 C-terminal interacting factor). PCIF1 is a nuclear protein that interacts with PDX-1 both in vitro and in vivo and inhibits PDX-1 transactivation. In the adult pancreas, PCIF1 is expressed in the insulin-producing β cells and in a subset of exocrine acinar and duct cells. PCIF1 is the first protein identified to interact with the C-terminal domain of PDX-1, and it is the first partner that represses PDX-1 transactivation. The coexpression of PCIF1 with PDX-1 in the pancreas suggests that modulation of PDX-1 function by PCIF1 may be required for normal pancreas development and/or differentiation.

Bradykinin and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) induce cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in human airway smooth muscle cells. Here we extended our study to explore the gene transcriptional regulation. By transfection with various COX-2 promoter reporter constructs, we found that the bp -327-to-+59 promoter region was essential for COX-2 gene transcription by bradykinin and IL-1beta and that the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) was critical in bradykinin-induced transcription, whereas nuclear factor IL-6 and CRE and, to a lesser extent, nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) were involved in IL-1beta-induced transcription. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay revealed that both bradykinin and IL-1beta elicited CRE-binding protein-1 (CREB-1) binding, and IL-1beta also elicited CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta and NF-kappaB binding to their respective elements in the COX-2 promoter. These transcription factors were associated with the COX-2 promoter, which was dynamically linked to different patterns of histone H4 acetylation by bradykinin and IL-1beta, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation. We also revealed that endogenous prostaglandin E(2) was critical in bradykinin-induced COX-2 transcription initiation and involved in IL-1beta-induced COX-2 transcription at a latter stage. Our result provide the first evidence that COX-2 transcriptional regulation by different stimuli involves different promoter elements and transcription factors and is associated with chromatin remodeling after selective histone H4 acetylation in a stimulus-specific manner.

The TAL1 (or SCL) gene, originally identified from its involvement by a recurrent chromosomal translocation, encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor essential for erythropoiesis. Although presumed to regulate transcription, its target genes are largely unknown. We show here that a nuclear complex containing TAL1, its DNA-binding partner E47, zinc finger transcription factor GATA-1, LIM domain protein LMO2, and LIM domain-binding protein Ldb1 transactivates the protein 4.2 (P4.2) gene through two E box GATA elements in its proximal promoter. Binding of this complex to DNA was dependent on the integrity of both E box and GATA sites and was demonstrated to occur on the P4.2 promoter in cells. Maximal transcription in transiently transfected cells required both E box GATA elements and expression of all five components of the complex. This complex was shown, in addition, to be capable of linking in solution double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the two P4.2 E box GATA elements. This DNA-linking activity required Ldb1 and increased with dimethyl sulfoxide-induced differentiation of murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells. In contrast, enforced expression in MEL cells of dimerization-defective mutant Ldb1, as well as wild-type Ldb1, significantly decreased E box GATA DNA-binding activities, P4.2 promoter activity, and accumulation of P4.2 and beta-globin mRNAs. These studies define a physiologic target for a TAL1- and GATA-1-containing ternary complex and reveal a positive role for Ldb1 in erythroid gene expression and differentiation.

12 pages, 7 figures., Upstream regulatory factor (USF) and sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) play key roles in the transcriptional regulation of the fatty acid synthase (FAS) gene by feeding and insulin. Due to the dual binding specificity of SREBP, as well as the presence of multiple consensus sites for these transcription factors in the FAS promoter, their physiologically relevant functional binding sites have been controversial. Here, in order to determine the occupancy of the putative USF and SREBP binding sites, we examined their protein-DNA interactions in living animals by using formaldehyde cross-linking and immunoprecipitation of chromatin and tested the function of these elements by employing mice transgenic for a reporter gene driven by various 5' deletions as well as site-specific mutations of the FAS promoter. We show that the -332 and -65 E-boxes are bound by USF in both fasted and refed mice, while the -150 SRE is bound by SREBP-1 only in refed mice. We also found that mutation of either the -150 SRE or the -65 E-box abolishes the feeding-induced activation of the FAS promoter in transgenic mice. Furthermore, in vivo occupancy of the FAS promoter by SREBP in the fed state can be prevented by mutation not only of the -150 SRE but, unexpectedly, of the -65 E-box as well. We conclude that the FAS promoter is activated during refeeding via the induced binding of SREBP to the -150 SRE and that USF binding to the -65 E-box is also required for SREBP binding and activation of the FAS promoter., The work was supported by NIH grant DK36264 to H.S.S.

The ability of the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor protein to regulate cell growth is due, at least in part, to its ability to interact with and regulate the E2F family of transcription factors (8, 34). The E2F proteins have been shown to control the expression of a large number of genes involved in DNA replication, cell cycle progression, and cell fate determination. The E2F family is composed of six distinct gene products that form heterodimeric complexes with partners of the DP family. Sequence analysis reveals three distinct subfamilies of E2F genes: the E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 genes, the E2F4 and E2F5 genes, and the E2F6 gene. This division also coincides with functional distinctions. The E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 genes are tightly regulated by cell growth and during the cell cycle, whereas E2F4, E2F5 and E2F6 are constitutively expressed. This cell cycle regulation of E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 transcription is complemented by mechanisms that tightly regulate the accumulation of the proteins. An N-terminal domain unique to E2F1 to E2F3 is responsible for both ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the proteins (29) and targeting by the cyclin A/cdk2 kinase, the latter leading to inhibition of DNA binding capacity (7, 22, 23, 53). The E2F proteins also vary in their role as transcriptional regulatory activities. While E2F1 to E2F3 act as positive regulators of transcription, E2F4 and E2F5 appear to function primarily as transcriptional repressors in concert with Rb family members. E2F6 also appears to function as a transcriptional repressor but in a manner independent of Rb (4, 10, 47, 48). Various experiments have suggested distinct functional roles for the activating E2F proteins E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3. The E2F3 protein appears to be particularly important for cell proliferation, as seen from the inhibition of E2F3 activity by antibody microinjection (25) as well as the results of deletion of the E2F3 gene (18). Moreover, the expression of a number of E2F target genes that encode key cell cycle regulatory proteins, including B-Myb, cyclin A, cdc2, cdc6, and dihydrofolate reductase, are reduced in E2F3 null fibroblasts but not in E2F1 null cells (18). In contrast, E2F1 appears to play a role in triggering an apoptotic response, either when overexpressed in the absence of survival signals (6, 21, 39, 43, 51) or in response to DNA damage (27). In addition, the ability of Myc to induce apoptosis is impaired in the absence of E2F1 function but unaltered by the absence of either E2F2 or E2F3 (26). Given the role of the E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 proteins as transcriptional activators, the specificity of function might best be explained by an ability of these E2F proteins to activate distinct target genes that then carry out these functions of apoptosis or proliferation. As an example, the p19ARF gene has been shown to be an E2F1 target gene (2, 6), linking the action of the Rb/E2F pathway with the p53 response leading to apoptosis. Similarly, the Apaf1 gene appears to be activated specifically by E2F1 (30). Although one potential mechanism for such specificity could be an ability of these proteins to recognize subtle differences in cis-acting promoter sequences, there is little evidence for distinct DNA sequence recognition among the E2F isoforms. More importantly, analysis of the structure of an E2F-DNA complex did not show a capacity for distinct DNA sequence recognition when the amino acid variation within the E2F family is considered (56). An alternative mechanism for promoter specificity could involve distinct protein-protein interactions. Possibly, sequences within E2F3 allow interaction with a subset of cellular proteins that provide a basis for promoter specificity and that are distinct from the proteins that can interact with E2F1. For example, the interaction of the herpesvirus VP16 transcriptional activator protein with the cellular factor HCF-1 and the cellular Oct-1 transcription factor redirects Oct-1 to herpesvirus immediate-early promoters by virtue of expanded DNA sequence recognition (1). A further example of combinatorial specificity as a mechanism for the specificity of transcription factor function is the pancreatic islet factor STF-1, which interacts with Pbx in a cooperative fashion and targets Pbx to a subset of promoters containing STF-1 binding sites (38). Recently, we identified the YY1-binding protein RYBP as a factor which binds to E2F2 and E2F3 but not E2F1 and recruits these E2Fs to a subset of E2F target promoters containing YY1 binding sites (41). To further explore the mechanistic basis for the specificity of E2F transcription activation, we used yeast two-hybrid screens to identify proteins that specifically interact with E2F3. In so doing, we identified the TFE3 transcription factor as a specific partner for E2F3. Recent experiments identified TFE3 as an activity that can rescue Rb-mediated growth arrest, providing a functional link between TFE3 and the Rb/E2F pathway (M. Nijman, S. Hijmans, and R. Bernards, personal communication). Moreover, previous work identified TFE3 as a fusion partner in chromosomal rearrangements in renal cell carcinomas (14, 45, 50). We further show that TFE3 and E2F3 can act synergistically to activate the p68 subunit gene of DNA polymerase α, dependent on the ability of the two proteins to physically interact, and that the two activities associate with the p68 promoter within intact cells in a mutually dependent manner.

Transcription of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes is regulated by both tissue-specific (basal) and hormone/cytokine (activated) mechanisms. Although promoter-proximal regulatory elements have been characterized extensively, the role of the core promoter in mediating regulation has been largely undefined. We report here that the class I core promoter consists of distinct elements that are differentially utilized in basal and activated transcription pathways. These pathways recruit distinct transcription factor complexes to the core promoter elements and target distinct transcription initiation sites. Class I transcription initiates at four major sites within the core promoter and is clustered in two distinct regions: "upstream" (-14 and -18) and "downstream" (+12 and +1). Basal transcription initiates predominantly from the upstream start site region and is completely dependent upon the general transcription factor TAF1 (TAF(II)250). Activated transcription initiates predominantly from the downstream region and is TAF1 (TAF(II)250) independent. USF1 augments transcription initiating through the upstream start sites and is dependent on TAF1 (TAF(II)250), a finding consistent with its role in regulating basal class I transcription. In contrast, transcription activated by the interferon mediator CIITA is independent of TAF1 (TAF(II)250) and focuses initiation on the downstream start sites. Thus, basal and activated transcriptions of an MHC class I gene target distinct core promoter domains, nucleate distinct transcription initiation complexes and initiate at distinct sites within the promoter. We propose that transcription initiation at the core promoter is a dynamic process in which the mechanisms of core promoter function differ depending on the cellular environment.

The yeast MADS-box transcription factor Mcm1p plays an important regulatory role in several diverse cellular processes. In common with a subset of other MADS-box transcription factors, Mcm1p elicits substantial DNA bending. However, the role of protein-induced bending by MADS-box proteins in eukaryotic gene regulation is not understood. Here, we demonstrate an important role for Mcm1p-mediated DNA bending in determining local promoter architecture and permitting the formation of ternary transcription factor complexes. We constructed mutant mcm1 alleles that are defective in protein-induced bending. Defects in nuclear division, cell growth or viability, transcription, and gene expression were observed in these mutants. We identified one likely cause of the cell growth defects as the aberrant formation of the cell cycle-regulatory Fkh2p-Mcm1p complex. Microarray analysis confirmed the importance of Mcm1p-mediated DNA bending in maintaining correct gene expression profiles and revealed defects in Mcm1p-mediated repression of Ty elements and in the expression of the cell cycle-regulated YFR and CHS1 genes. Thus, we discovered an important role for DNA bending by MADS-box proteins in the formation and function of eukaryotic transcription factor complexes.

The basic helix-loop-helix protein BETA2/NeuroD activates transcription of the secretin gene and is essential for terminal differentiation of secretin-producing enteroendocrine cells. However, in heterodimeric complexes with its partner basic helix-loop-helix proteins, BETA2 does not appear to be a strong activator of transcription by itself. Mutational analysis of a proximal enhancer in the secretin gene identified several cis-acting elements in addition to the E-box binding site for BETA2. We identified by expression cloning the zinc finger protein RREB-1, also known to exist as a longer form, Finb, as the protein binding to one of the mutationally sensitive elements. Finb/RREB-1 lacks an intrinsic activation domain and by itself did not activate secretin gene transcription. Here we show that Finb/RREB-1 can associate with BETA2 to enhance its transcription-activating function. Both DNA binding and physical interaction of Finb/RREB-1 with BETA2 are required to potentiate transcription. Thus, Finb/RREB-1 does not function as a classical activator of transcription that recruits an activation domain to a DNA-protein complex. Finb/RREB-1 may be distinguished from coactivators, which increase transcription without sequence-specific DNA binding. We suggest that Finb/RREB-1 should be considered a potentiator of transcription, representing a distinct category of transcription-regulating proteins.

Life on earth has evolved on a photic carousel, spinning through alternating periods of light and darkness. This playful image belies the fact that only those organisms that learned how to benefit from the recurring features in their environment were allowed to ride on. This selection process has engendered many daily rhythms in our biosphere, most of which rely on the anticipatory power of an endogenously generated marker of phase: the biological clock. The basic mechanisms driving this remarkable device have been really tough to decode but are finally beginning to unravel as chronobiologists probe deeper and wider in and around the recently discovered gears of the clock. Like its chemical predecessors, biological circadian oscillators are characterized by interlaced positive and negative feedback loops, but with constants and variables carefully balanced to achieve an approximately 24h period. The loops at the heart of these biological oscillators are sustained by specific patterns of gene expression and precisely tuned posttranscriptional modifications. It follows that a molecular understanding of the biological clock hinges, in no small measure, on a better understanding of the cis-acting elements that bestow a given gene with its circadian properties. The present review summarizes what is known about these elements and what remains to be elucidated.

Transcription factors bind to specific DNA motifs in promoters to regulate gene expression. The cell-division cycle is supported by periodic transcription of selected genes which peak in expression when they are required. In fission yeast, 2 clusters of cell-cycle-regulated genes show maximal expression during mitosis and cell division, respectively, many of which are being regulated by a transcriptional cascade involving the forkhead transcription factor Sep1 which controls the zinc finger transcription factor Ace2.1 The Sep1-Ace2 transcriptional pathway promotes the separation of daughter cells after mitosis by timely expression of genes required for the degradation of the cell-division septum. Sep1 is thought to act together with the MADS-box factor Mbx1 and another forkhead protein, Fkh2, which negatively controls transcription.2 Recently, yet another transcription factor, Sak1, has been shown to be the major activator of mitotic genes.3

Transcription is a major regulatory mechanism for the generation of slow- and fast-twitch myofibers. We previously identified an upstream region of the slow TnI gene (slow upstream regulatory element [SURE]) and an intronic region of the fast TnI gene (fast intronic regulatory element [FIRE]) that are sufficient to direct fiber type-specific transcription in transgenic mice. Here we demonstrate that the downstream half of TnI SURE, containing E box, NFAT, MEF-2, and CACC motifs, is sufficient to confer pan-skeletal muscle-specific expression in transgenic mice. However, upstream regions of SURE and FIRE are required for slow and fast fiber type specificity, respectively. By adding back upstream SURE sequences to the pan-muscle-specific enhancer, we delineated a 15-bp region necessary for slow muscle specificity. Using this sequence in a yeast one-hybrid screen, we isolated cDNAs for general transcription factor 3 (GTF3)/muscle TFII-I repeat domain-containing protein 1 (MusTRD1). GTF3 is a multidomain nuclear protein related to initiator element-binding transcription factor TF II-I; the genes for both proteins are deleted in persons with Williams-Beuren syndrome, who often manifest muscle weakness. Gel retardation assays revealed that full-length GTF3, as well as its carboxy-terminal half, specifically bind the bicoid-like motif of SURE (GTTAATCCG). GTF3 expression is neither muscle nor fiber type specific. Its levels are highest during a period of fetal development that coincides with the emergence of specific fiber types and transiently increases in regenerating muscles damaged by bupivacaine. We further show that transcription from TnI SURE is repressed by GTF3 when overexpressed in electroporated adult soleus muscles. These results suggest a role for GTF3 as a regulator of slow TnI expression during early stages of muscle development and suggest how it could contribute to Williams-Beuren syndrome.

GAD65 and GAD67 are two isoforms of the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase which catalyze the production of GABA from glutamate, primarily in the brain. However, GAD and GABA also prevail in the retina, testes and islets of Langerhans. The main function of GABA is in neurotransmission, and it is involved in paracrine signalling in islets, but has also been suggested to play a role as a trophic factor in synaptogenesis and to be an important metabolite feeding into the tricarboxylic acid cycle via the GABA-shunt. Both GAD isoforms are subject to regulation, e.g. by synaptic activity. GAD65 is regulated at the level of enzyme activity by association and dissociation from its cofactor, PLP, whereas GAD67 is controlled at the level of its mRNA. To study this process in further detail, we have isolated and characterized the 5'-flanking region of the rat GAD67 gene. We report the transcriptional initiation sites and promoter sequences important for expression in islet beta-cells and C6 glioma cells, and demonstrate that the GAD67 promoter harbors elements that are responsive to glucose in primary islet cells.

Myc oncogene is a transcription factor that contributes to the genesis of a wide variety of tumors by regulating proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Despite being one of the first isolated oncogene, the biochemical mechanisms of Myc mediated transcriptional regulation remain unclear. Myc has been found to govern different aspects of gene expression, from chromatin remodeling to basal transcription and processive RNAPII elongation. Myc binding to targets genes depends on the presence of the E-box binding motif and the presence of histone H3K4me3 lysines. Here, we summarize recent findings regarding the function of Myc in orchestrating different steps in transcription, and we propose a model that links histone H3 methylation code to Myc target genes. Myc upon binding to the E box triggers a series of events that assembles the transcription initiation complex, recruits the demethylating enzyme LSD1, induces DNA oxidation and chromating looping. Once started RNAPII still needs Myc assistance during transcription elongation. Myc seems to modulate at least two crucial steps in transcription. i.e., chromatin modifications for initiation and RNAPII pause release for productive elongation.

We report the identification and characterization of a new Drosophila clock-regulated gene, takeout (to). to is a member of a novel gene family and is implicated in circadian control of feeding behavior. Its gene expression is down-regulated in all of the clock mutants tested. In wild-type flies, to mRNA exhibits daily cycling expression but with a novel phase, delayed relative to those of the better-characterized clock mRNAs, period and timeless. The E-box-containing sequence in the to promoter shows impressive similarities with those of period and timeless. However, our results suggest that the E box is not involved in the amplitude and phase of the transcriptional cycling of to. The circadian delayed transcriptional phase is therefore most likely the result of indirect regulation through unknown transcription factors.

The BETA2 (neuroD) gene is expressed in endocrine cells during pancreas development and is essential for proper islet morphogenesis. The objective of this study is to identify potential upstream regulators of the BETA2 gene during pancreas development. We demonstrated that the expression of neurogenin 3 (ngn3), an islet- and neuron-specific basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factor, partially overlaps that of BETA2 during early mouse development. More importantly, overexpression of ngn3 can induce the ectopic expression of BETA2 in Xenopus embryos and stimulate the endogenous RNA of BETA2 in endocrine cell lines. Furthermore, overexpression of ngn3 could cause a dose-dependent activation on the 1.0-kb BETA2 promoter in islet-derived cell lines. Deletion and mutation analyses revealed that two proximal E box sequences, E1 and E3, could bind to ngn3-E47 heterodimer and mediate ngn3 activation. Based on these results, we hypothesize that ngn3 is involved in activating the expression of BETA2 at an early stage of islet cell differentiation through the E boxes in the BETA2 promoter.

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors are a large group of proteins suggested to control key events in the development of B lymphocytes as well as of other cellular lineages. To examine how bHLH proteins activate a B-lineage-specific promoter, I investigated the ability of E47, E12, Heb, E2-2, and MyoD to activate the lambda5 surrogate light chain promoter. Comparison of the functional capacity of the E2A-encoded E47 and E12 proteins indicated that even though both were able to activate the lambda5 promoter and act in synergy with early B-cell factor (EBF), E47 displayed a higher functional activity than E12. An ability to act in synergy with EBF was also observed for Heb, E2-2, and MyoD, suggesting that these factors were functionally redundant in this regard. Mapping of functional domains in EBF and E47 revealed that the dimerization and DNA binding domains mediated the synergistic activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis using the 5' part of the lambda5 promoter revealed formation of template-dependent heteromeric complexes between EBF and E47, suggesting that the synergistic mechanism involves cooperative binding to DNA. These findings propose a unique molecular function for E47 and provide overlapping expression with EBF as a molecular mechanism to direct B-cell-specific target gene activation by bHLH proteins.

Using a high-copy-number suppressor screen to obtain clues about the role of the yeast RNA polymerase II subunit RPB4 in transcription, we identified three suppressors of the temperature sensitivity resulting from deletion of the RPB4 gene (DeltaRPB4). One suppressor is Sro9p, a protein related to La protein, another is the nucleosporin Nsp1p, and the third is the RNA polymerase II subunit RPB7. Suppression by RPB7 was anticipated since its interaction with RPB4 is well established both in vitro and in vivo. We examined the effect of overexpression of each suppressor gene on transcription. Interestingly, suppression of the temperature-sensitive phenotype correlates with the correction of a characteristic transcription defect of this mutant: each suppressor restored the level of promoter-specific, basal transcription to wild-type levels. Examination of the effects of the suppressors on other in vivo transcription aberrations in DeltaRPB4 cells revealed significant amelioration of defects in certain inducible genes in Sro9p and RPB7, but not in Nsp1p, suppressor cells. Analysis of mRNA levels demonstrated that overexpression of each of the three suppressors minimally doubled the mRNA levels during stationary phase. However, the elevated mRNA levels in Sro9p suppressor cells appear to result from a combination of enhanced transcription and message stability. Taken together, these results demonstrate that these three proteins influence transcription and implicate Sro9p in both transcription and posttranscription events.

Previously, we have used a chromatin cross-linking and immunoprecipitation protocol for the analysis of Myc and USF binding to the cad promoter. The adaptation of this technique for the study of mammalian transcription factors was a big step forward in the analysis of transcription factor family member specificity, allowing for the first time a definitive knowledge of which factor binds to a promoter region under normal physiological conditions. However, due to limitations of the assay, our previous studies could not definitively prove that both Myc and USF bound to the exact same site on the cad promoter, nor could we directly correlate loss of in vivo binding of a particular factor with loss of transcriptional activity. Therefore, we have further modified the chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol to alleviate these problems. We have now shown that it is possible to coexamine growth-regulated transcriptional activity and promoter occupancy by using stably integrated promoter constructs. We show that both Myc and USF bind to the exact same E box on the cad promoter, suggesting that competition between these two factors for a single site occurs in living cells. We also find that cad promoter constructs that retain USF binding but lose Myc binding in vivo no longer display an increase in transcriptional activity in mid- to late G(1) phase of the cell cycle. Finally, we propose that cell cycle-regulated transcriptional activation of the cad promoter may be a stochastic, rather than a predetermined, process.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gene expression in the late G(1) phase is activated by two transcription factors, SBF and MBF. SBF contains the Swi4 and Swi6 proteins and activates the transcription of G(1) cyclin genes, cell wall biosynthesis genes, and the HO gene. MBF is composed of Mbp1 and Swi6 and activates the transcription of genes required for DNA synthesis. Mbp1 and Swi4 are the DNA binding subunits for MBF and SBF, while the common subunit, Swi6, is presumed to play a regulatory role in both complexes. We show that Stb1, a protein first identified in a two-hybrid screen with the transcriptional repressor Sin3, binds Swi6 in vitro. The STB1 transcript was cell cycle periodic and peaked in late G(1) phase. In vivo accumulation of Stb1 phosphoforms was dependent on CLN1, CLN2, and CLN3, which encode G(1)-specific cyclins for the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28, and Stb1 was phosphorylated by Cln-Cdc28 kinases in vitro. Deletion of STB1 caused an exacerbated delay in G(1) progression and the onset of Start transcription in a cln3Delta strain. Our results suggest a role for STB1 in controlling the timing of Start transcription that is revealed in the absence of the G(1) regulator CLN3, and they implicate Stb1 as an in vivo target of G(1)-specific cyclin-dependent kinases.

The tissue-specific expression of major histocompatibility complex class I genes is determined by a series of upstream regulatory elements, many of which remain ill defined. We now report that a distal E-box element, located between bp -309 and -314 upstream of transcription initiation, acts as a cell type-specific enhancer of class I promoter activity. The class I E box is very active in a neuroblastoma cell line, CHP-126, but is relatively inactive in the HeLa epithelial cell line. The basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper proteins upstream stimulatory factor 1 (USF1) and USF2 were shown to specifically recognize the class I E box, resulting in the activation of the downstream promoter. Fine mapping of USF1 and USF2 amino-terminal functional domains revealed differences in their abilities to activate the class I E box. Whereas USF1 contained only an extended activation domain, USF2 contained both an activation domain and a negative regulatory region. Surprisingly, the naturally occurring splice variant of USF2 lacking the exon 4 domain, U2DeltaE4, acted as a dominant-negative regulator of USF-mediated activation of the class I promoter. This latter activity is in sharp contrast to the known ability of U2DeltaE4 to activate the adenovirus major late promoter. Class I E-box function is correlated with the relative amount of U2DeltaE4 in a cell, leading to the proposal that U2DeltaE4 modulates class I E-box activity and may represent one mechanism to fine-tune class I expression in various tissues.

Seven Enhancer of split genes in Drosophila melanogaster encode basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors which are components of the Notch signalling pathway. They are expressed in response to Notch activation and mediate some effects of the pathway by regulating the expression of target genes. Here we have determined that the optimal DNA binding site for the Enhancer of split proteins is a palindromic 12-bp sequence, 5'-TGGCACGTG(C/T)(C/T)A-3', which contains an E-box core (CACGTG). This site is recognized by all of the individual Enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix proteins, consistent with their ability to regulate similar target genes in vivo. We demonstrate that the 3 bp flanking the E-box core are intrinsic to DNA recognition by these proteins and that the Enhancer of split and proneural proteins can compete for binding on specific DNA sequences. Furthermore, the regulation conferred on a reporter gene in Drosophila by three closely related sequences demonstrates that even subtle sequence changes within an E box or flanking bases have dramatic consequences on the overall repertoire of proteins that can bind in vivo.

Two transcription factors, Oaf1p and Pip2p (Oaf2p), are key components in the pathway by which several Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding peroxisomal proteins are activated in the presence of a fatty acid such as oleate. By searching the S. cerevisiae genomic database for the consensus sequence that acts as a target for these transcription factors, we identified 40 genes that contain a putative Oaf1p-Pip2p binding site in their promoter region. Quantitative Northern analysis confirmed that the expression of 22 of the genes identified is induced by oleate and that either one or both of these transcription factors are required for the activation. In addition to known peroxisomal proteins, the regulated genes encode novel peroxisomal proteins, a mitochondrial protein, and proteins of unknown location and function. We demonstrate that Oaf1p regulates certain genes in the absence of Pip2p and that both of these transcription factors play a role in maintaining the glucose-repressed state of one gene. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the defined consensus binding site is not required for the regulation of certain oleate-responsive genes.

The Xenopus TFIIIA gene is transcribed very efficiently in oocytes. In addition to a TATA element at −30, we show that from −425 to +7 the TFIIIA gene contains only two positive cis elements centered at −267 (element 1) and −230 (element 2). This arrangement of the cis elements in the TFIIIA gene is striking because these two elements are positioned very close to each other yet separated from the TATA element by approximately 190 nucleotides. We show that the 190-nucleotide spacing between the TATA element and the upstream cis elements (elements 1 and 2) is critical for efficient transcription of the gene in oocytes and that a nucleosome is positioned in this intervening region. This nucleosome may act positively on TFIIIA transcription in oocytes by placing transcription factors bound at elements 1 and 2 in a favorable position relative to the transcription complex at the TATA element.