Search

To explore the experiences of new motorised mobility scooter users from the perspectives of the assessment and training of scooter skills.Descriptive secondary analysis of qualitative data.Community.20 New users of motorised mobility scooters.Not applicable.Directed qualitative analysis of up to four semi-structured interviews over the course of the first year of scooter use, to identify themes and sub-themes that could inform recommendations regarding assessment and training protocols.We identified two themes. The first related toThe experiences of scooter users over the first year of receiving a scooter appear to be relevant to the assessment and training of scooter skills and suggest themes for further study.

Purpose To explore the experience and acceptability of an exoskeleton-based physiotherapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation from the perspective of patients and therapists. Materials and methods This was a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Fourteen patients with stroke who participated in the experimental arm of a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy were recruited. Six physiotherapists who provided the intervention were also recruited. Results Three themes were identified relating to the experience and acceptability of an exoskeleton-based physiotherapy program: (1) A matter of getting into the swing of things depicted the initial and ongoing learning process of using an exoskeleton; (2) More of a positive experience than anything else described the participants' mostly favorable attitude toward exoskeleton-based gait training; and (3) The best step forward captured participant-identified recommendations and considerations for the future integration of exoskeleton training into stroke rehabilitation. Conclusions Patients with stroke were even more optimistic than therapists toward the experience and benefits of exoskeleton-based gait training during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Future clinical practice should consider the balance between actual and perceived benefits, as well as the potential barriers to integrating an exoskeleton into stroke rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPowered robotic exoskeletons can be used to provide higher duration and more repetitious walking practice for non-ambulatory patients with stroke.Patients with stroke view exoskeleton-based physiotherapy highly favorably, attributing greater opportunity and benefit to using the device during subacute rehabilitation.Physiotherapists should consider learning challenges, patient characteristics, and implementation barriers when integrating exoskeleton-based training within a treatment program.

Arm crank ergometry and adaptive rowing are existing exercise options for wheelchairs users, but not commonly available. This study was conducted to explore exercise participation of wheelchair users, as well as the usability of the adaptive rowing ergometer (aROW) and arm crank ergometer (ACE).This mixed-methods study used a concurrent triangulation design. Following completion of both exercise sessions (5 min each), participants (Wheelchair users exercised for improved physical and mental health, as well as for functional independence, and community participation; however, lack of accessible equipment was a prominent barrier. Both the aROW and ACE have high usability, but the aROW was perceived as more enjoyable and effective for cardiovascular exercise.The implementation of the aROW into community gyms has the potential to help close the existing gap in inclusive equipment and may help people with disabilities to be more fully included in their community and lead healthier lives.Implications for rehabilitationWheelchair users perceive exercise as a meaningful activity that enhances physical health and risk of disease, functional independence, community participation, and overall social and emotional health.The adapted rowing machine was perceived as highly usable and was felt to be more enjoyable and effective for cardiovascular exercise compared to traditional arm crank ergometers.The adaptive rower provides an additional accessible equipment option for wheelchair users to obtain effective cardiovascular exercise.More available equipment may increase community participation and promote inclusion for wheelchair users.

Objectives: Loneliness and depression are of increasing concern in long-term care homes made more urgent by viral outbreak isolation protocols. An innovative program called Java Mentorship was deve...

Powered wheelchairs promote participation for people with mobility limitations. For older adults with cognitive impairment, existing training methods may not address learning needs, leading to difficulty with powered wheelchair skills. Error-minimized training, facilitated by shared control technology, may provide learning opportunities more suited to this population.The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an error-minimized approach to powered wheelchair skills training using shared control in residential care. Feasibility indicators were hypothesized a priori to be feasible for use in a definitive RCT.A 2 × 2 factorial RCT compared an error-minimized powered wheelchair skills training program (Co-pilot) to a control intervention at two doses (6 sessions vs. 12 sessions). Data were collected on the feasibility of study processes (e.g., recruitment), resources (e.g., participant time), management (e.g., technology reliability), and training outcomes (e.g., adverse events, clinical outcomes).Twenty-five older adults with cognitive impairment participated in the study. Technical issues were encountered in 14.5% of training sessions. Participants receiving 6 sessions of training adhered better to the treatment than those receiving 12 sessions. All participants learned the skills required for PWC use with minor errors, regardless of the training method or dose. Co-pilot participants and trainers reported feelings of safety and training benefits with the use of shared control technology.Individuals with mild to moderate cognitive impairment are able to learn the skills required to drive a powered wheelchair in as few as six training sessions. Further evaluation of the Co-pilot training program is required.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONShared control teleoperation technology may be used to augment learning in older adults with cognitive impairments.Evaluation of the feasibility of use of novel rehabilitation technologies is critical prior to engaging in large-scale clinical research.Individuals with cognitive impairment are able to learn the required skills for operation of a powered wheelchair.

Powered wheelchair use promotes participation in individuals with limited mobility, however training is required for safe and effective use. There is limited evidence on the task demands of powered wheelchair use to inform an evidence-based skills training programme.To conduct a systematic exploration of the task demands of indoor powered wheelchair use to identify frequently used skills, abilities, and knowledge.We used a two-phased think aloud process to conduct a task analysis of powered wheelchair use with experienced powered wheelchair users (One-hundred and ten (110) distinct skills and abilities were identified and mapped to the ICF; 80 in the Body Structures and Functions domain, and 30 in the Activities and Participation domain. Approximately 50% of skills and abilities were mental functions. Four thematic knowledge domains were identified: knowledge of self, environment, wheelchair, and task.Powered wheelchair use is complex and requires a variety of skills and abilities from all areas of human functioning, in addition to a wide range of knowledge. Training programmes should address a range of areas of skill development.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPowered wheelchair use is a complex skill; training should develop skills from all.Domains of the ICF, including mental and physical functions.A range of knowledge is used while operating a powered wheelchair; training programs.Should include the development and application of necessary knowledge.Clinicians may consider a range of factors when assessing suitability for powered.Wheelchair user, however should acknowledge that while the range of skills idenotified.May be useful, they may not be critical for success in powered wheelchair use.

Lower limb exoskeletons are a recent intervention promoted to improve gait disorders. Available research has focused on clinical outcomes; however, little is known about therapists' experiences using the device in practice.We explored the implementation of an exoskeleton at a tertiary rehabilitation center.In this longitudinal qualitative study we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 therapists. One group of therapists was formally trained using the device, whereas the other group only had clinical exposure to the device. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes.Three main themes emerged: (1)The exoskeleton represents one of the most complicated and labor-intensive interventions provided by therapists. Implementation requires substantial resources, raising questions regarding its efficacy and cost-effectiveness relative to other approaches. Until more evidence becomes available around the use and effectiveness of this rapidly evolving technology, therapists must contend with a high degree of uncertainty.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONUsing a lower limb exoskeleton may reduce physical demands on therapists in high-intensity rehabilitation programs that involve repetitive, effortful movements.However, a number of potential barriers to implementing the exoskeleton into practice need to be taken into consideration, including calibration time, intensive training required to become qualified to administer the intervention, the cost of the device, and comfort and safety of the device affecting user acceptance and uptake.Therapists also need to manage patient expectations related to outcomes related to use of exoskeletons.

Purpose: Research has yet to examine the experiences of paddle boarders, or of kayakers with disabilities other than spinal cord injuries. The goal of this study was to explore the experiences of kayakers and paddle boarders in two adaptive paddling programs.Method: Participants were children and adults requiring physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial supports. Using an ethnographic approach, participant observations (n = 24) and semi-structured interviews (n = 11) were completed. Data were analyzed thematically.Result: We identified three main themes. "Different Strokes" described the personal meaning participants ascribed to aspects of paddling, including valuing fun, exercise and relaxation. "Turning the Tide" illustrated the process of becoming a paddler, from doubting capacity to feeling competent. "Headwinds" explored paddlers' interactions with the broader social, institutional, and economic environments, such as inadequate funding and program aversion to risk.Conclusions: Programs offering a variety of adaptive paddle boarding and kayaking configurations enable paddlers to make valued choices about their participation. In addition to providing equipment and support to meet paddlers' functional abilities, program developers and clinicians should also consider individual preferences for exercise, socialization, risk taking, self-presentation of disability, and independence.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeople living with physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial impairments perceive kayaking and paddle boarding as meaningful activities offering opportunities to exercise, have fun, achieve goals, socialize, and/or relax on the water.Kayakers and paddle boarders value equipment options that meet their physical and disability-disclosure preferences.Despite the existence of adaptive paddling programs, participation may be restricted by program availability, risk management policies, and leisure funding.

The use of mobility scooters is becoming more common due to their effectiveness, social acceptability, and cost. A variety of benefits have been associated with scooter use, including increased mob...

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of current and former sailors, staff and volunteers who were involved in an adaptive recreational sailing program and identify the factors t...

The neighbourhood built environment influences mobility and participation of persons using mobility assistive technology (MAT). Documentation of environmental barriers/facilitators by MAT users can...

Introduction: Manual wheelchairs with spontaneous, user-initiated seating adjustability allow users to independently adjust both rear seat height and backrest angle on-the-fly to optimize positioni...

Introduction: Wheelchair users deploy a variety of strategies to increase their visibility to motorists. Unfortunately, there is no empirical evidence supporting the use of any of these visibility strategies with this population.Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of four different visibility strategies (i.e., light emitting diode (LED) lighting system, reflective safety vest, orange flag, or control (i.e., black clothing)) for wheelchair users in nighttime and daytime conditions.Methods: Participants were shown videos from the driver's perspective depicting a wheelchair user waiting to cross the street while using one of the four visibility strategies in isolation during nighttime and daytime. Participants indicated when, if at all, they first saw the wheelchair user at the roadside. Results were compared to determine which strategy allowed for the longest reaction time.Results: In nighttime conditions, the most effective strategy was the LED lighting system followed by the reflective vest. Neither the orange flag nor black clothing provided an adequate stopping distance when a vehicle was traveling at 32km/h at night. During daytime conditions, all visibility strategies were effective when a vehicle was traveling at this speed.Conclusions: These results will help clinicians and enable wheelchair users to make informed choices about the best visibility strategies to use.

Purpose: Providing care to older adults using assistive technology can be challenging for family caregivers. To inform the development of an Internet-based intervention, this study aimed to identify older assistive technology users and family caregivers’ needs related to assistive technology procurement, and to explore how to offer remote support through an Internet-based intervention. Methods: Based on an iterative user-centered design approach, 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders about their experiences with assistive technology procurement/attribution and their perceptions of a proposed intervention. A modified content analysis approach was used, with a mix of emerging and a priori concepts. Results: Participants view assistive technology procurement as an ongoing cyclical process, with potential unmet needs at key moments before and after assistive technology procurement. Assistive technology user-family caregiver dyads needs focus on assistive technology information, access, assistive technology-person-context match, training and support. While participants felt there were benefits to the proposed intervention they also identified potential implementation barriers. Conclusion: Assistive technology Internet-based interventions dedicated to family caregivers should ensure systematic and tailored follow-up while integrating some form of human support. This study guides the prototype design of the proposed intervention towards a graded support approach, empowering assistive technology users and family caregivers to resolve assistive technology-related challenges.Implication for rehabilitationProviding home-based care to older adults using assistive technology (e.g., mobility aids, communication aids) can be challenging for family caregivers.Using a user-centered design approach, an Internet-based intervention is under development to support older assistive technology users and their family caregivers.Through interviews with diverse stakeholders, this study explores unmet needs related to assistive technology procurement and perceptions about the proposed intervention. Providing home-based care to older adults using assistive technology (e.g., mobility aids, communication aids) can be challenging for family caregivers. Using a user-centered design approach, an Internet-based intervention is under development to support older assistive technology users and their family caregivers. Through interviews with diverse stakeholders, this study explores unmet needs related to assistive technology procurement and perceptions about the proposed intervention.

New geared wheelchair wheels have been developed allowing the user to pull backwards on the rims to move forward. Theoretically, this utilizes larger muscle groups compared to conventional propulsion preventing repetitive stress injuries. This study compared the gross mechanical efficiency (GME), perceived effort and energy expenditure of propelling the wheelchair using two types of these geared wheels and standard forward propulsion wheels. A within participants repeated measures design was used. Participants' energy expenditure and perceived exertion were measured. GME was calculated based on power output and energy expenditure values. Ten able-bodied participants were enrolled in the study. Standard wheels required the least energy expenditure and were perceived as the lightest to propel for nine of the participants; while the low-geared wheels were perceived as the hardest to propel. Results favored the standard wheels under these conditions. Research is needed to explore the effect of training and different slope angles.

First Place Award Submission - CA147Category: Clinical ApplicationManagement of obesity after spinal cord injury: a systematic reviewMir Hatef Shojaei1, Mohammad Alavinia1, B. Catharine Craven1,21N...

A rear mounted, powered, drive wheel has been developed to assist with mobility for manual wheelchairs. The version tested operates in two modes (indoor and outdoor). To start in the indoor mode users must initiate propulsion with sufficient force to trigger the motor. To stop users must apply a braking force through the handrims. . The objectives of this study were to compare (1) the minimum force required to start a wheelchair with and without the drive, and (2) the distances and forces needed to stop a wheelchair at different treadmill speeds with and without the device. We used a crossover study design with 24 able-bodied persons. The main outcome measures were starting force single push speed, stopping distance, and stopping force. Participants did not have significantly increased starting force or single push speed using the drive. Participants had significantly shorter absolute stopping distance (p = 0.045 and reduced stopping force (p = 0.02) using the add-on at both treadmill speeds. Given the decreased stopping distances, the add-on may be a viable option for wheelchair users with limited upper limb strength.

Outdoor activities in natural settings have been found to be beneficial for overall health and well-being. However, people with disabilities may have different experiences accessing outdoor activities in natural settings. This research explored the experiences of users, volunteers, and staff, and perspectives of non-users about an adapted hiking program that uses a specialized mobility device called a TrailRider. The research had three objectives: 1. Describe the experiences of users, volunteers, and staff; 2. Identify perceived barriers to or limitations of participating for users, volunteers, staff, and non-users; and 3. Explore the impact of participation for users, volunteers, and staff.This ethnographic study used a combination of observations and in-depth interviews as a means of data collection.Researchers accompanied 38 participants on five hikes and conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 participants. Analysis identified three themes: "Let the Good Times Roll" described how TrailRider users and volunteers enjoyed the opportunity to explore the great outdoors. "An Uphill Battle" acknowledged perceived physical and psychological barriers to participation. "Clearing the Path" addressed potential areas for program improvement.This study emphasized how volunteers and users appreciated the outdoor and social opportunities the program afforded. The study identified a number of potential improvements that could be implemented to improve access to the program. Implications for Rehabilitation Outdoor recreation programs create positive experiences, as well as unique social opportunities for users and volunteers. Identifying and considering physical and psychological barriers would improve wilderness access for individuals with disabilities. Despite the fact that outdoor recreation programs, like the adaptive hiking program, are in place, deficient marketing and promotion limit users and volunteers from taking part.

Long-term care (LTC) residents with cognitive impairments frequently experience limited mobility and participation in preferred activities. Although a power wheelchair could mitigate some of these mobility and participation challenges, this technology is often not prescribed for this population due to safety concerns. An intelligent power wheelchair (IPW) system represents a potential intervention that could help to overcome these concerns. The purpose of this study was to explore a) how residents experienced an IPW that used three different modes of control and b) what perceived effect the IPW would have on their daily lives.We interviewed 10 LTC residents with mild or moderate cognitive impairment twice, once before and once after testing the IPW. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analyses.Our analyses identified three overarching themes: (1) the difference an IPW would make, (2) the potential impact of the IPW on others and (3) IPW-related concerns.Findings from this study confirm the need for and potential benefits of IPW use in LTC. Future studies will involve testing IPW improvements based on feedback and insights from this study. Implications for rehabilitation Intelligent power wheelchairs may enhance participation and improve safety and feelings of well-being for long-term care residents with cognitive impairments. Intelligent power wheelchairs could potentially have an equally positive impact on facility staff, other residents, and family and friends by decreasing workload and increasing safety.

To understand the perspectives of various stakeholders on the importance of and issues around scooter training and to identify elements recommended for a new scooter-training program.A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the past and present scooter users, their caregivers, scooter prescribers and vendors across Canada and internationally. These stakeholders were asked about the importance of scooter training, the training currently provided/available, and the content and format of training they preferred.The majority of stakeholders strongly agreed that scooter training is important to ameliorate skills and increase confidence. Only 25% of scooter users reported receiving training. There was consensus regarding the basic (e.g. on/off switch, control, speeds, battery maintenance) and advanced skills (e.g. completing community errands, using an elevator, public transit, crossing intersections) that should be included in scooter training.Despite its perceived importance, few users reported receiving training, which suggests a large unmet need. The findings of this study lay the groundwork for the development of a scooter training program that is intended to give users the skills to participate safely and confidently in their communities. Implications for Rehabilitation Respondents indicate that scooter training is important for skill development and self-confidence. Reported rates of scooter training are low. Respondents recommend that scooter training should occur in clients' homes and communities. Consideration of the person and their environment is important to ensure that training meets the needs and abilities of the scooter user.

This letter to the editor is in response to the article by Pettersson, Pettersson and Frisk entitled, "ICF from an occupational therapy perspective in adult care: an integrative literature review". Given the breadth of this topic, the authors have done an admirable job in their survey of the topic. One area we felt deserved additional attention was the inadequate way the ICF classification system codes mobility assistive technology use. We also offer a point of clarification about the Wheelchair Outcome Measure, which was identified incorrectly as the only wheelchair specific measure that could measure activity and participation.