Search

Naomi Hayashi,1 Yasuyoshi Sato,1 Yu Fujiwara,1,2 Naoki Fukuda,1 Xiaofei Wang,1 Kenji Nakano,1 Testuya Urasaki,1 Akihiro Ohmoto,1 Makiko Ono,1 Junichi Tomomatsu,1 Yukiko Sato,3 Hiroki Mitani,4 Takashi Toshiyasu,5 Shunji Takahashi1 1Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York City, NY, USA; 3Pathology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 4Head and Neck Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; 5Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Yasuyoshi SatoThe Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, JapanTel +8135200111Fax +81335200141Email yasuyoshi.sato@jfcr.or.jpPurpose: There have been few reports on the evaluation of cancer cachexia based on skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in patients with head and neck cancer.Patients and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two head and neck cancer patients were enrolled. In definitive and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy settings, clinical outcomes were compared between cachexia and non-cachexia patients.Results: Forty patients were diagnosed with cachexia (20.8%). In the definitive setting, overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the cachexia group (3-year OS: 50.0% vs 88.5%; p < 0.01), and multivariate analysis identified UICC stage IV, baseline albumin of < 4 and cachexia as poor prognostic factors. However, cachexia was not significant in the adjuvant setting.Conclusion: Cancer cachexia was negatively associated with prognosis in patients with HNC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Nutritional intervention during chemoradiotherapy may improve survival in these patients.Keywords: head and neck cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, sarcopenia, cachexia, muscle, skeletal, chemoradiotherapy, prognosis

Background In the CheckMate-141 trial, nivolumab conferred a survival benefit in patients with recurrent or metastatic refractory squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) head and neck cancer (HNC). Here, we examined the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with histological subtypes or primary sites of HNC not included in the CheckMate-141 trial. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from 97 patients who were treated with nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic HNC at our institution. The patients were assigned to three groups based on HNC primary site: 1) oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, which were included in CheckMate-141 (n = 68), 2) nasopharynx (excluded in CheckMate-141, n = 7) and 3) other primary sites excluded in CheckMate-141 (n = 22) and assigned to two groups according to histological subtype: 1) SCC (included in CheckMate-141, n = 83) and 2) non-SCC (all sites excluded in CheckMate-141, n = 14). Survival outcomes and nivolumab treatment response were compared between the primary site and histological subgroups. Results The median number of nivolumab treatments was 7 cycles (range, 1-53 cycles) and the median follow-up time was 9.1 months (range, 0.66-33.0 months). There were no significant differences in response rates between the three primary site subgroups (CheckMate-141 sites 22%, nasopharynx 43%, others 18%; p=0) or the two histological subtype subgroups (SCC 25%, non-SCC 7%, p=0). Similarly, overall survival and progression-free survival were comparable for patients stratified by primary site or histological subtype. Conclusion No significant difference in response rates or survival outcomes was detected between nivolumab-treated HNC patients with primary sites and histological subtypes that were included versus excluded in the CheckMate-141 trial. These data provide a potential rationale for nivolumab therapy for all HNC patients in clinical practice.

Introduction: Transformation is a multi-step event wherein indolent lymphomas, such as follicular lymphomas, are converted into an aggressive subtype, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This process progresses not only through mutations in several of the causative genes, such as TP53, CDKN2A/B, or MYC, but also through epigenetic or micro-environmental changes. Excisional biopsy is recommended when transformation is clinically suspected.Areas covered: The authors summarized the current knowledge regarding the clinicopathological and molecular features of transformed lymphomas and discussed the relevance of re-biopsy in the diagnosis of transformation, comparing it with noninvasive diagnostic tools [fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis].Expert opinion: Pathological confirmation by biopsy is considered the golden standard for diagnosis and is indispensable for determining subsequent treatment strategies. The potential weakness of this approach is its invasiveness and the unavailability of pathological findings outside the biopsied areas. In the context of relapse, PET/CT is used mainly for the selection of the best suitable biopsy site, while ctDNA has the potential for detecting systemic genomic changes associated with relapse before clinical presentation. Future investigations should be focused on combining biopsies with new technologies for an early and accurate diagnosis of transformation.

Introduction: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a type of peripheral T-cell lymphomas harboring aggressive biological behaviors and presenting unique immunologic hyperactivation. Gene expression profiling has revealed that AITL cells derive from follicular T helper (Tfh) cells. The prognosis is poor under CHOP-like regimen, and salvage chemotherapy is mostly ineffective. Thus, novel therapies are required in patients with AITL. NCCN Guidelines for peripheral T-cell lymphoma refer to cyclosporin (CyA) as one therapeutic option in second- or later lines especially for AITL cases unfeasible for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The clinical data of AITL are based on small-scale case series, and prospective trials are scarce.Areas covered: In this article, the authors reviewed published articles or conference abstracts, and extracted total 26 patients with AITL receiving CyA.Expert opinion: The overall response rate in above 26 patients was outstanding (86% in second or later lines), suggesting the utility in heavily treated cases including those who underwent HSCT. Meanwhile, publication bias is the most serious limitation in this literature review. Larger case series or prospective data with CyA alone or in combination with other drugs are warranted to establish the position in the treatment strategy of patients with AITL.

Detection of immunoglobulin light chain restriction (LCR) by flow cytometry (FCM) is a useful tool for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) diagnosis. Here, we identified B-NHLs without LCR by FCM and investigated the pathological causes for lack of LCR. A total of 89/471 cases (19%) of B-NHL were LCR-negative. The incidence of lack of LCR was 30% both in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and was 6% in follicular lymphoma (FL). In DLBCL cases, low expression of surface membrane light chain (33%), low proportion of lymphoma cells (11%), CD45 negativity (9%), and destruction or sampling error were suggested as reasons for lack of LCR. In MZL cases, the low proportion of lymphoma cells owing to admixture of many reactive germinal centres, and non-detection of plasmacytoid lymphoma cells by CD45 gating might be the reasons. Based on pathological subtypes, the frequency and reasons for lack of LCR by FCM varied.