Search

Objectives: Previous investigations comparing intraosseous (IO) and intravenous (IV) epinephrine delivery in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) suggest that epinephrine is oftentimes more expeditiously administered via the IO route, but this temporal benefit doesn't always translate to clinical benefit. However, very few studies adequately controlled for indication and resuscitation time biases, making the influence of first epinephrine route on OHCA outcomes unclear. To determine the association between first epinephrine route and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) while controlling for resuscitation time bias and other potential confounders., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative dataset. Adult patients with a witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival were included. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between medication route and ROSC. Linear regression was then used to calculate the probability of ROSC for each route across all call receipt-to-drug delivery intervals. Using these linear equations, the call receipt-to-drug delivery intervals were calculated that would yield equivalent probabilities of ROSC between the IV and IO routes., Results: Data were available for 10,350 patients, of which 27.4% presented with a shockable rhythm, 29.7% received bystander CPR, and 39.6% experienced ROSC. After controlling for confounders, IO epinephrine was associated with decreased likelihood of ROSC (OR = 0.77, p  < 0.001). The linear regression models provided differing slope coefficients for ROSC between each route, with the IV route associated with a higher likelihood of ROSC for any given call receipt-to-drug-delivery interval. From these equations, the additional time allowed to establish an IV and administer epinephrine intravenously beyond the time required for IO delivery, yet with an equivalent predicted probability of ROSC via the IO route, was calculated. This additional time interval for intravenous administration declined linearly from 9 min at a call receipt-to-intraosseous epinephrine interval of 4 min to no additional time at a call receipt-to-intraosseous epinephrine interval of 29 min., Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of a national EMS database revealed that IO epinephrine was negatively associated with ROSC. Additionally, there appears to be a finite time window during which intravenous epinephrine remains superior to the intraosseous route even if there are brief initial delays in IV drug delivery.

Introduction: There is a minimal amount of published data regarding to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to obtain program characteristics and diversity data regarding EMS fellowship programs. Methods: A survey was sent to program directors at all EMS fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Data collected included: year program started, year program accredited, unfilled fellow positions, number of EMS faculty, gender, and race/ethnicity. Gender and race/ethnicity data from EMS fellowships were compared to emergency medicine (EM) residencies using data from the American Association of Medical Colleges. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS with descriptive statistics, and Chi-square tests. Results: The response rate for the survey was 88% (45/51) of all EMS fellowship programs that were accredited at the time of this survey. Most programs (71%) offer a one-year EMS fellowship, with the remaining offering an optional second year. The median number of physician response vehicles per program was 1.0 (IQR 0.0-2.0), with 24% (11/45) not having a dedicated physician response vehicle. This survey identified that 118 EMS fellows have graduated since inception of the accreditation process, while 34 positions went unfilled. The median number of EMS fellow positions per program was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-2.0), with a range of 1 to 4. It was noted that 31% of programs had no female EMS faculty, and 48% of programs had no under-represented minority EMS faculty. There was a significantly larger proportion of female faculty in EM residency programs (30.5%; 949/3,107) compared to EMS fellowships (19%; 53/274), OR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.3-2.5, p < 0.0001. There was a significantly larger proportion of female fellows in EMS (56%; 66/118) vs. female residents in EM (38%; 2,193/5,777), OR" = 2.1, 95% CI:1.4-3.0, p < 0.0001. There was a significantly larger proportion of under-represented minority faculty in EM residency programs (19.7%; 786/3,978) vs. EMS fellowships (12.0%, 33/274), OR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.2-2.6, p < 0.002. Conclusion: A significant number of EMS fellowship positions have remained unfilled since implementation of an accreditation process for EMS fellowships. The percentage of females and under-represented minority faculty in EMS programs was much lower than for EM residency programs.

Background: When working in a tactical environment there are several different airway management options that exist. One published manuscript suggests that when compared to endotracheal intubation, the King LT laryngotracheal airway (KA) device minimizes time to successful tube placement and minimizes exposure in a tactical environment. However, comparison of two different blind insertion supraglottic airway devices in a tactical environment has not been performed. This study compared the I-Gel airway (IGA) to the KA in a simulated tactical environment, to determine if one device is superior in minimizing exposure and minimizing time to successful tube placement., Methods: This prospective randomized cross over trial was performed using the same methods and tactical environment employed in a previously published study, which compared endotracheal intubation versus the KA in a tactical environment. The tactical environment was simulated with a one-foot vertical barrier. The participants were paramedic students who wore an Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) and a ballistic vest (IIIA) during the study. Participants were then randomized to perform tactical airway management on an airway manikin with either the KA or the IGA, and then again using the alternate device. The participants performed a low military type crawl and remained in this low position during each tube placement. We evaluated the time to successful tube placement between the IGA and KA. During attempts, participants were videotaped to monitor their height exposure above the barrier. Following completion, participants were asked which airway device they preferred. Data was analyzed using Student's t-test across the groups for time to ventilation and height of exposure., Results: In total 19 paramedic students who were already at the basic EMT level participated. Time to successful placement for the KA was 39.7 seconds (95%CI: 32.7-46.7) versus 14.4 seconds (95%CI: 12.0-16.9) for the IGA, p < 0.001. Maximum height exposure of the helmet above a one foot vertical barrier for the KA resulted in 1.42 inches of exposure (95%CI: 0.38-0.63) compared to the IGA with 1.42 inches, 95%CI:0.32-0.74, p = 0.99. On questioning 100% of the participants preferred the IGA device over the KA., Conclusion: In a simulated tactical environment placement of the IGA for airway management was faster than with the KA, but there was no difference in regard to exposure. Additionally, all the participants preferred using the IGA device over the KA.

Introduction: Survival from cardiac arrest is associated with having a shockable presenting rhythm (VF/pulseless VT) upon EMS arrival. A concern is that several studies have reported a decline in the incidence of VF/PVT over the past few decades. One plausible explanation is that contemporary cardiovascular therapies, such as increased use of statin and beta blocker drugs, may shorten the duration of VF/PVT after arrest. As a result, EMS response time would become an increasingly important factor in the likelihood of a shockable presenting rhythm, and consequently, cardiac arrest survival., Objective: To develop a model describing the likelihood of shockable presenting rhythm as a function of EMS response time., Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of cardiac arrest using the North Carolina Prehospital Care Reporting System (PreMIS). Inclusionary criteria consisted of adult patients suffering nontraumatic cardiac arrests witnessed by a layperson between January 1 and June 30, 2012. Patients defibrillated prior to EMS arrival were excluded. Chi-square and t-tests were used to analyze the relationship between shockable presenting rhythm and patient age, gender, and race; response time measured as elapsed minutes between 9-1-1 call receipt and scene arrival; and bystander CPR. Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of shockable presenting rhythm as a function of response time while controlling for statistically significant covariates., Results: A total of 599 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, VF/PVT was observed in 159 patients (26.5%). VF/PVT was less likely with increasing EMS response time (OR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87-0.97, p < 0.01) and age (OR 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, p < 0.01), while males (OR 1.98, 95% CI = 1.29-3.03, p < 0.01) and Caucasians (OR 1.86, 95% CI = 1.17-2.95, p < 0.01) were more likely to have shockable presenting rhythm. Bystander CPR was not associated with shockable presenting rhythm, although EMS response time was longer among patients with bystander CPR compared to those without (9.83 vs. 8.83 minutes, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: We found that for every one minute of added ambulance response time, the odds of shockable presenting rhythm declined by 8%. This information could prove useful for EMS managers tasked with developing EMS system response strategies for cardiac arrest management.