Search

Specific targeting of drugs to for instance tumors or sites of inflammation may be achieved by means of immunoliposomes carrying site-specific antibodies on their surface. The presence of these antibodies may adversely affect the circulation kinetics of such liposomes as a result of interactions with cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), mainly represented by macrophages in liver and spleen. The additional insertion of poly(ethylene glycol) chains on the surface of the immunoliposomes may, however, attenuate this effect. We investigated the influence of surface-coupled rat or rabbit antibodies and of PEG on the uptake of liposomes by rat Kupffer cells in culture with (3)H-cholesteryloleyl ether as a metabolically stable marker. Additionally, we assessed the effects of surface-bound IgG and PEG on the intracellular processing of the liposomes by the Kupffer cells, based on a double-label assay using the (3)H-cholesteryl ether as an absolute measure for liposome uptake and the hydrolysis of the degradable marker cholesteryl-(14)C-oleate as relative measure of degradation. Attachment of both rat and rabbit antibodies to PEG-free liposomes caused a several-fold increase in apparent size. The uptake by Kupffer cells, however, was 3-4 fold higher for the rat than for the rabbit IgG liposomes. The presence of PEG drastically reduced the difference between these liposome types. Uptake of liposomes without antibodies amounted to only about 10% (non-PEGylated) or less (PEGylated) of that of the immunoliposomes. In contrast to the marked effects of IgG and PEG on Kupffer cell uptake, the rate of intracellular processing of the liposomes remained virtually unaffected by the presence of these substances on the liposomal surface. These observations are discussed with respect to the design of optimally formulated liposomal drug preparations, combining maximal therapeutic efficacy with minimal toxicity.

Radiolabeled ([3H]cholesteryloleyl ether) immunoliposomes directed against rat colon adenocarcinoma CC531 cells were prepared by random coupling of a tumor cell-specific antibody, CC52, via a thio ether bond. In vitro binding experiments demonstrated a saturable and specific interaction of CC52-immunoliposomes, which could be inhibited by free non-coupled CC52 but not by irrelevant antibodies. The in vivo targeting potential of CC52-immunoliposomes, which were pegylated to achieve prolonged circulation times, was tested in an established rat liver CC531 metastasis model. Twenty-four hours after injection of the liposomes, 25% of the CC52-immunoliposomes were still present in the blood, which was comparable with the control liposomes (either with or without antibody). Liposomes were mainly taken up from the blood by the liver and the spleen, although hepatic uptake of the immunoliposomes was higher and splenic uptake was lower as compared to liposomes without antibody. Within the metastatic tumor nodules in the liver, uptake of both the CC52-immunoliposomes and non-specific immunoliposomes was significantly higher than that of control liposomes without antibody. Visualization of fluorescently or gold labeled CC52-immunoliposomes revealed that, although targeting to liver metastases was achieved, the immunoliposomes were mostly not associated with tumor cells but rather localized in tumor associated cells, probably macrophages.

3',5'-O-dipalmitoyl-5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR-dipalmitate), a lipophilic prodrug of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR), was incorporated in different types of liposomes. The in vivo distribution and intrahepatic deacylation of liposomal FUdR-dipalmitate was found to be strongly dependent on liposome composition and on drug to lipid ratio. The use of fluid-type liposomes (egg PC/PS/CHOL) rendered FUdR-dipalmitate more susceptible to enzymatic breakdown than solid-type liposomes (DSPC/DPPG/CHOL). A decrease of the retention of the drug in the body was also obtained when FUdR-dipalmitate was incorporated in solid-type liposomes with high drug to lipid ratio (1:10) than with low ratio (1:50). In spite of these substantial differences in the rates at which FUdR was liberated from liposomes with different fluidity, size, or drug to lipid ratio, only minor differences in therapeutic effect were observed in a number of murine tumour models (P388 leukaemia, Lewis Lung carcinoma, B16 melanoma and a C26 adenocarcinoma liver metastasis model). The lipophilic prodrug of FUdR exhibited antitumour activity at 100-600 times lower doses than the free drug. However, at these therapeutic doses FUdR-dipalmitate was also far more toxic. This prohibited the use of higher doses to increase antitumour activity.