Search

The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical and ultrasound risk factors in predicting severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (≥1.5 L) in pregnancies undergoing caesarean section for placenta praevia. This cohort consists of all cases of placenta praevia undergoing caesarean delivery over a period of 5 years in a service unit. Patients and their delivery data were retrieved from an obstetric database. Ultrasound features were prospectively recorded before caesarean section. The incidence of caesarean section for placenta praevia was 0.98% ( n  = 215). Of these, 12.1% ( n  = 26) had severe PPH. A logistic regression model showed that major praevia, antepartum haemorrhage before delivery and anterior placenta remained significant factors associated with severe PPH. The sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive value of the model are 96.2%, 59.8%, 24.8% and 99.1%, respectively. Our model had high sensitivity and negative predictive value for severe PPH during caesarean section for placenta praevia.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Placenta praevia is known to be one of the leading causes of severe PPH. Many risk factors have been associated with severe bleeding during caesarean section for placenta praevia. However, the importance of individual factors in predicting pregnancy outcome remains controversial. What the results of this study add? Our model includes only three simple parameters, namely the presence of significant antepartum haemorrhage (APH) from the history, and anterior or posterior placenta and major or minor praevia from ultrasound findings, but could predict up to 96.2% of all severe PPH. More importantly, the absence of APH, a posterior minor praevia, was associated with a negative predictive value of 99.1% of severe PPH, implying that such cases could be treated as 'normal' low risk caesarean sections. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This simple model would allow differential pre-operative counselling of patients on risks and complications, planning and preparation of operation, allocation of staff as well as in contingency measures to be taken during operation. The establishment of a differential protocol for placenta praevia based on these simple risks factors and a prospective trial of such a protocol is suggested.

In this first Asian study, the decision outcomes (decision conflict, decision regret, and anxiety) of 262 pregnant women offered noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for high-risk Down screening results were assessed. Decision conflict was experienced by 3.5% and level of decisional regret low (mean score 15.7, 95%CI 13.2-18.3). All 13 cases of decisional regret were NIPT acceptors. Elevated anxiety was experienced by 55.9% at the time of decision making about NIPT and persistent in 30.3%. Insufficient knowledge about NIPT was associated with elevated anxiety at decision making (p = .011) and with decisional regret (p = .016). Decisional regret was associated with prolonged anxiety (p = .010).

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore whether increase in use of second-line conservative surgical procedures will alter the rate of peripartum hysterectomies in management of severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH)., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort. All pregnant patients with gestation > = 28 weeks with severe PPH (> = 1.5 L) within 72 h of delivery from year 2000 to 2015 (16-year period) in an obstetric training unit was recruited. Basic patient anthropometric characteristics and the main causes for PPH were calculated. The incidence of any second-line conservative surgical procedures and peripartum hysterectomies were evaluated. The total number of patients in each category was then stratified into four 4 years-intervals (4 quadrennium) to compare trends., Results: The incidence of severe PPH gradually increased over the study period (lowest 0.21% in 2002 to 0.76% in 2015) (p < .001). There is an obvious increasing trend in the overall use of second-line surgical procedures from nil to 82% (p < .001), with balloon tamponade constituting up to 48%. The incidence of successful second-line procedures increased gradually from 72.2% in the second quadrennium to 89% in the fourth quadrennium. The total peripartum hysterectomy rate among cases of severe PPH could be seen to drop from 40.2% in the first to 10.9% in the fourth quadrennium (p = .04)., Conclusions: Despite the increasing trends in PPH, the increasing utilisation of second-line conservative surgical procedures in severe PPH should be able to reduce the need for peripartum hysterectomy.

The aim of this study was to review the indications for caesarean delivery of second twins after vaginal delivery of a first twin (combined delivery) and the associated foetal outcomes of the second twin. Possible factors that could be employed to predict combined delivery were explored. This was a retrospective review of all twin pregnancies delivered in a tertiary maternity unit between 2000 and 2013. All twins (> =24 week gestation) with vaginal delivery of the first twin were reviewed. Of a total of 1039 pairs of twins, 441 pairs had vaginal delivery of the first twin, of which 47 (10.7%) needed combined delivery. Presentation of the second twin was found to be significantly associated with combined delivery (p < .001). The odds ratio for combined delivery for breech second twin was 2.4 compared with vertex second twins while the odds ratio for transverse lie second twin was 182.8. Second twins who were delivered by combined delivery had a higher incidence of 5 min Apgar score <7. The extremely high odds ratio for combined delivery for second twins in transverse lie would probably indicate that attempts at vaginal delivery of these vertex/transverse twin pregnancies would not be worthwhile. Impact statement It remains controversial in the literature whether non-vertex second twins are associated with a higher risk for combined delivery as compared to vertex second twins. Almost all previous studies have analysed the non-vertex second twins as a whole group rather than separating them into breech presentation and transverse lie. There is only one study analysing breech presentation and transverse lie of second twin separately but it has recruited only 14 patients. To our knowledge, the cohort is the largest available dataset comparing the odds ratio for combined delivery of breech and transverse lie of the second twin separately. We found that transverse lie of the second twin have extremely high rates of combined delivery with an odds ratio 182.8 and this may be ascribed to the lack of attempts to perform internal podalic version. Combined delivery is associated with higher maternal and neonatal morbidities. With such a high risk of transverse lie second twin in having combined delivery, it appears reasonable to advise women with vertex/transverse twins not to attempt vaginal delivery unless there are obstetricians who have experience in performing internal podalic version at the time of delivery. This is useful for patient counselling regarding the decision of the mode of delivery.