Search

Influenza, respiratory syncytial, and parainfluenza viruses usually cause mild, self-limited illness in adults. However, elderly and immunocompromised persons are at increased risk for development of severe pneumonia. Clinical and radiographic features of epidemic viral pneumonias are often nonspecific. Newer and faster methods of viral culture and viral antigen detection have improved the capability for definitive diagnosis in recent years. Preventive measures for influenza virus pneumonia center on limiting exposure of high-risk patients to active cases of influenza, administering annual vaccinations, and providing chemoprophylaxis. Prophylaxis against RSV is effective in preventing complications. No effective vaccines have been developed against RSV or parainfluenza. Therapy for viral pneumonia is primarily supportive. Amantadine may be beneficial for influenza virus pneumonia, and ribavirin may be useful for RSV and parainfluenza virus disease. However, further definitive studies are necessary to determine their roles in these viral pneumonias.

Three herpesviruses--herpes simplex, varicella-zoster, and cytomegalovirus--commonly cause respiratory tract infections in immunocompromised patients. Adenoviruses and measles virus are also significant causes of respiratory disease in this population. Diagnosis of herpesvirus infections is difficult because these viruses can establish latency and are often shed intermittently in the absence of invasive disease. A positive respiratory tract culture of herpesviruses alone is not diagnostic of active invasive disease. Preventive measures should focus on limiting the patient's exposure to active infection, broad use of available vaccines in children and susceptible adults, and use of hyperimmune globulin and chemoprophylaxis in high-risk patients. Adenovirus pneumonia is diagnosed by viral culture and rapid antigen detection assays, whereas measles pneumonia is often identifiable by the characteristic rash. Treatment of either adenovirus or measles pneumonia is primarily supportive.

Despite enhanced laboratory techniques such as viral culture, rapid antigen detection, and gene amplification, a confident diagnosis of viral pneumonia continues to be a challenge. The nonspecific nature of clinical characteristics and the extreme sensitivity of laboratory techniques make the diagnosis difficult, even when a viral agent is detected. Understanding the limitations of these technological advances and the use of histopathologic techniques can greatly enhance a skilled clinician's ability to make an accurate diagnosis.

When bacteremia is suspected, the physician's first step is to determine the most likely source by using all available data from the history, physical examination, and laboratory studies. When evaluation for bacteremia is warranted, two or three sets of blood cultures should be carefully obtained using strict procedure guidelines, and empirical antibiotic therapy should be initiated. If the source of bacteremia has not been identified, blood culture results must be correlated with the clinical situation so that further investigations may be pursued and antimicrobial therapy may be initiated or modified. A high index of suspicion must be maintained for unusual or fastidious pathogens in immunocompromised patients.