Search

Objective: Environmental control includes measures to prevent exposure to common aeroallergens in an individual's home. Questionnaires are part of the clinical practice of health assessment, and are also widely used in research. Our aim was to develop and validate a questionnaire to identify possible sources of aeroallergens present in the indoor environment., Methods: This study describes the development, validation and application of a questionnaire. For content validation the Content Validation Index and Ordinal Cronbach's Alpha Index have been used; Polychoric Correlations for the agreement between judges; and an Exploratory Factor Analysis for the structure of the questionnaire, while for reliability assessment, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient has been applied., Results: Twenty-one doctors participated as judges to validate the questionnaire, which 204 patients answered. The Content Validity Index for all the questions on the "Clarity" aspect was 0.846 ± 0.152 and on the "Relevance" aspect, 0.954 ± 0.080. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the "Clarity" aspect was 0.88 with a 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the "Relevance" aspect, 0.94 with a 95% CI. The average Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.94 and all the F tests were highly significant., Conclusions: The questionnaire developed by our group was considered valid and reliable, and is capable of portraying the home environment without the need for a personal visit to the patient's home. This questionnaire would be a good tool to use in research or during patient consultations to assess the patient's home environment, as this latter assessment is essential for the management of patients with respiratory allergies.

Over the last few decades, inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) became the cornerstone in the treatment of persistent asthma. Their use improved asthma control, decreased mortality and also minimized adverse reactions associated with systemic steroid. Esophageal candidiasis is a rare complication resulting from the use of ICs. Although, in recent years, as their prescriptions has increased, more cases have been reported, especially in Japan. Listed are 4 case reports regarding esophageal candidiasis in asthmatic patients associated with inhaled budesonide administration. In the cases reported herein, the use of a different device of dry powder budesonide might have favored esophageal drug deposition and Candida infection. Patients denied using systemic corticosteroids in the previous 6 months. Furthermore, none of the patients presented Diabetes mellitus, malignant disease, HIV infection, or other immunosuppressive conditions. We conclude that patients treated with high doses of ICs are at higher risk of developing esophageal candidiasis. These patients should undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy whenever they present symptoms. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that infection might also be asymptomatic and esophageal candidiasis prevalence may be higher than that reported thus far.

Introduction: Rhinitis and asthma are currently recognized as manifestations of a single syndrome, the chronic allergic respiratory syndrome. Nearly all individuals with asthma have rhinitis, and severe rhinitis has been associated with worse outcomes in asthma patients. Intranasal treatment has been reported to be beneficial for the lower airways., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The objective was to evaluate the effects that treatment with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 400 microg/d) has on nasal and bronchial symptoms, as well as on lung function test results and bronchial responsiveness to histamine in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. We evaluated 33 patients, divided into two groups: treatment (n = 17); and placebo (n = 16). Over the course of the 125-day study period, each patient reported daily rhinitis and asthma symptoms, as well as the need for additional medication. All patients were submitted to spirometry and histamine challenge at baseline and at each subsequent evaluation (on days 50 and 75)., Results: In comparison with the patients in the placebo group, those in the BDP treatment group presented significantly fewer nasal symptoms on day 50 and fewer asthma symptoms on day 75 (p < 0.01 for both); required rescue medications less often; and presented a significantly lower degree of bronchial responsiveness to histamine on day 75 (p < 0.01)., Conclusion: In this study, intranasal BDP was effective in treating rhinitis as well as asthma. The benefits for the lower airways were observed only after prolonged treatment and might be better evaluated through nonspecific bronchial challenge.