Search

Oxidative stress, caused by the formation of free radicals, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), leads to cell and tissue degradation, contributing to various diseases and aging. While oxygen is essential for aerobic organisms, it inevitably causes oxidative stress. Antioxidants protect against damage from free radicals, and oxidative stress arises when an imbalance occurs between free radical production and antioxidant defenses. However, when investigating whether an excess of antioxidants, almost eliminating oxidative stress, could benefit aging and disease susceptibility, it was observed that a basic level of oxidative stress appears necessary to maintain the correct homeostasis of tissues and organs and life in general. Therefore, this review aimed to compile the most significant and recent papers characterizing and describing the dual role of oxygen as a molecule essential for life and as a precursor of oxidative stress, which can be detrimental to life. We conducted targeted searches in PubMed and Google browsers to gather all relevant papers. We then focused on the eye, an organ particularly vulnerable due to its high metabolic activity combined with direct exposure to light and environmental pollutants, which produces a substantial number of free radicals (mainly ROS). We present a curated selection of relevant literature describing the main ocular pathologies of the posterior and anterior segments of the eye, highlighting oxidative stress as a significant contributing factor. Additionally, we report how endogenous and exogenous antioxidants can mitigate the development and progression of these diseases. Finally, we consider a frequently overlooked aspect: the balance between oxidants and antioxidants in maintaining the homeostatic equilibrium of tissues and organs. It is widely recognized that when oxidants overwhelm antioxidants, oxidative stress occurs, leading to negative consequences for the organism's homeostasis. However, we emphasize that a similarly dangerous situation can arise when the presence of antioxidants overwhelms the production of free radicals, drastically reducing their amount and adversely affecting aging and longevity. Unfortunately, no specific studies have addressed this particular situation in the eye.

This review explores the connection between the ocular surface microbiome and glaucoma, highlighting its impact on disease progression. Beginning with an overview of global glaucoma significance, it emphasizes the importance of understanding the cellular characteristics and microbiology of the ocular microbiome. A search was conducted on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using the phrase “ocular microbiome glaucoma”. 0 records were returned from the Cochrane Library while 21 were returned from PubMed. A total of 21 results were retrieved from 2017 to 2024. This comprised one opinion paper, four original research articles, and 16 reviews. This review covered the anatomy of the ocular surface, advanced analysis methods, and the ocular microbiome. It also delved into dysbiosis in glaucoma, addressing altered microbial communities and their potential role in disease progression. The intricate interplay between the ocular microbiome and the host’s immune system is explored, emphasizing crosstalk and inflammatory responses. The review concludes by discussing therapeutic implications, including modulating ocular microbiota and potential future treatment strategies. Understanding the microbiome in healthy and glaucomatous eyes can help researchers and clinicians in innovative approaches to ocular health.

Background: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation plays a pivotal role in the onset of cell damage induced by hyperglycemia and represents one of the major factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. In this study, we tested the antioxidants cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) and verbascoside (Verb) in the protection of retinal endothelium against glucose toxicity “in vitro”. Methods: Increasing amounts (5–50 μM) of C3G, Verb or the combination of both compounds were tested in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells (HREC) grown with normal glucose (5 mM, NG) or high glucose (25 mM, HG). Results: Reduced cell viability and enhanced ROS levels (evaluated by MTT and H2DCFDA assays, respectively) in HG-stimulated HREC were restored by C3G and Verb in a dose-dependent manner, achieving the maximum protection in the presence of both compounds. Moreover, co-treatment with C3G and Verb worked better than each single molecule alone in the prevention of the disruption of blood-retinal-barrier-like properties by HG in a confluent HREC monolayer, as assessed by trans endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and Na-Fluorescein permeability assays. Accordingly, C3G and Verb together also better counteracted the HG-induced down-regulation of the tight junction membrane proteins Zonula Occludens-1 and VE-Cadherin evaluated by immunocytochemical and Western blot analyses. Conclusions: In conclusion, our data indicate that C3G and Verb could efficiently protect the retinal endothelium against high glucose damage.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the treatment with eye-drops based on a combination of antioxidant and mucomimetic molecules, namely 0.1% alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and 0.3% hydroxy-propyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) on the ocular surface of diabetic patients with dry eye symptoms. Methods: Seventy patients, 42 M and 28 F, aged from 50 to79 years (mean 62.1 ± 10.5), affected by type II diabetes mellitus, were enrolled and divided in two groups treated for 2 months as follows: Group 1 (35 patients), received topical ALA/HPMC three times a day, Group 2 (35 patients) received topical HPMC (0.3%) alone, three times a day. The main outcome measures were: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer I test, corneal sensitivity. An examination of tear film morphology with confocal microscopy was carried out in a subset of patients of each group at baseline and after two months. Statistical analysis was performed with t-test for the parametric data and Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-squared test for the nonparametric data. Results: Both treatments resulted in significant improvements of BUT, OSDI and tear film morphology, although the improvements observed in group 1 showed a higher trend than what observed for group 2. Moreover, only in group 1 a significant improvement was visible for corneal staining, and no significant improvements were observed in any group for Schirmer I and sensitivity. Conclusions: These results confirmed the efficacy of HPMC in the treatment of diabetic dry eye and indicated that the addition of a strong self-regenerating antioxidant like ALA may give a distinctive advantage for the healing of corneal defects (as evidenced by corneal staining), beside improving HPMC efficacy on three other parameters (BUT, OSDI score, tear morphology). Therefore, the addition of a strong antioxidant like ALA can be helpful in preventing or treating ocular surface defects in diabetic patients, in which the oxidative damage is predominant.