Search

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound guided elastography is an imaging modality that can be used to evaluate tissue stiffness and to assess solid pancreatic lesions. It can also assist in optimizing the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsies., Aims: To review the literature on solid pancreatic lesions, the use of EUS guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic ultrasound guided elastography and to present a single center experience using elastography to direct fine needle aspiration biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions., Methods: We present a review of the literature and a single center experience describing the use of EUS guided elastography in directing fine needle aspiration biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions., Results: Thirteen male veterans with an average age of 62.3 (SD±11.8) years were enrolled in the study. The mean pancreatic mass size on EUS was 5.1×5.2 (SD±4.4×4.5) cm. A total of 13 lesions were identified during elastography. The lesions were most commonly found in the body (n=5), followed by multifocal lesions (n=4), pancreatic head (n=3) and tail (n=1). The seven concerning pancreatic lesions were stratified based on color pattern identified on EUS and EUS-elastography. Three lesions were homogenously blue, and four lesions were heterogeneously blue. The remaining six lesions which were less concerning were predominantly green. Of the three lesions, that were homogenously blue, two were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (n=2) and chronic pancreatitis (n=1) respectively. Of the four heterogeneously blue lesions two were adenocarcinomas, while the other two represented a large B-cell lymphoma and chronic pancreatitis. Patients whose lesions were characterized as homogenous or heterogeneous green were benign and remained disease free after a median of two years of regular follow up., Limitations: Relatively small number of patients studied., Conclusions: In our single center experience we found that the use of real time endoscopic ultrasound guided elastography for targeting fine needle aspiration of suspicious pancreatic lesions may be beneficial as an adjunct modality to complement conventional EUS. Larger prospective studies need to be conducted to evaluate the utility of this modality in targeting pancreatic lesions., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

Context: Pancreatic stents may be placed during therapeutic ERCP for a variety of indications. One such indication is to prophylax against the development of pancreatitis following sphincterotomy of the minor papilla in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and pancreas divisum. Increasingly, endoscopists that perform pancreatic ERCP are placing small caliber (3 Fr), unflanged, single pigtail stents into the long axis of the pancreatic duct with the expectation that these stents will only stay in place for a few days and the majority will pass spontaneously on their own without the need for follow-up endoscopic retrieval. As such, these stents are generally regarded as safer and associated with a lower rare of complication than larger (5 and 7 Fr), double flanged pancreatic stents., Case Report: We present the case of a 3 Fr stent that migrated proximally into the dorsal duct in a patient with recurrent pancreatitis and pancreas divisum. Due to the small size of the patient's dorsal duct, it was difficult to pass appliances alongside the stent to facilitate retrieval and a variety of appliances were used before success was achieved., Discussion: The medical literature contains series of proximally migrated larger caliber flanged, pancreatic stents but proximal migration of small caliber, unflanged, pigtail stents has not yet been reported. As the use of these small stents increases, we feel that it is important to highlight the potential for this complication and discuss how we successfully treated our patient.

Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with a mass on radiologic studies, however, not every pancreatic mass is cancer. Since radiological studies alone are insufficient to establish the diagnosis of a pancreatic mass and patient management depends on a definitive diagnosis; confirmatory cytology or histology is usually required. As a minimally invasive procedure, EUS and EUS FNA avoid the risk of cutaneous or peritoneal contamination that may occur with CT or US-guided investigations and is less invasive than surgical interventions. As a result, EUS FNA of pancreatic masses is becoming the standard for obtaining cytological diagnosis. This chapter presents an EUS-based diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions and is based upon a review of the pertinent literature in the field of pancreatic endosonography that has been the most influential in helping to guide this evolving field. Realizing there is much overlap among the EUS characteristics of various pancreatic lesions, for the sake of simplicity we have structured our discussion in broad terms of solid versus cystic lesions and discuss various pancreatic lesions within this framework. The additional contributors to this round table discussion have been asked to provide a more dedicated, focused discussion of the various subcategories of pancreatic lesions in greater detail than we could hope to achieve here. We provide this final contribution to the round table as a means of bringing the discussion back to the big picture of pancreatic lesions, rather than trying to hone in on the fine details of any one subclass.