Search

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) represents the low-power, low-cost extension of the Bluetooth communication technology envisioned for the Internet of Things. Mesh protocols on top of BLE are currently emerging and the standard is currently being released. This paper first proposes a detailed measurement based comparison of two mesh approaches that fit within BLE operation: flooding and connection oriented networking. Using metrics such as packet delivery ratio (PDR), end-to-end delay and power consumption we conclude that the optimal mesh approach depends on the application. It is shown that for a comparable performance in terms of PDR and overhead, flooding can trade a lower end-to-end delay for a higher power consumption when compared to the connected mesh. We then propose an architecture, called Bluetooth Now, that is able to automatically switch the network between the two based on message priority. Our measurement results confirm the reliable delivery of important and urgent data sent using the Bluetooth Now paradigm, while saving battery life when transmitting non-time critical messages. ispartof: pages:1-6 ispartof: IEEE PIMRC 2017 Special Session SP-04 vol:2017-October pages:1-6 ispartof: IEEE PIMRC 2017 Special Session SP-04 location:Montreal, QC, Canada date:8 Oct - 13 Oct 2017 status: published

Vulnerabilities in key communication protocols that drive the daily operations of the power grid may lead to exploits that could potentially disrupt its safety-critical operation and may result in loss of power, consequent financial losses, and disruption of crucial power-dependent services. This paper focuses on the Inter Control Center Communications Protocol, (ICCP), which is the protocol used among control centers for data exchange and control. We discuss use of UPPAAL in formal modeling of portions of ICCP. Specifically, we present an iterative process and framework for the design and formal verification of tailored checking mechanisms that protect resource-exhaustion vulnerabilities in the protocol standard from attacks and exploits. We discuss insights we gained and lessons we learned when modeling the protocol functionalities and running the UPPAAL model checker to prove critical security and safety properties, and we discuss the overall success of this approach.

In today's IaaS clouds users only get a logical view of the underlying network and have limited control. Delegating more control to end users would be beneficial but would also raise security concerns for the provider. Emerging Software Defined Networking (SDN) technologies have the capabilities to facilitate delegation of network controls and provide some level of network abstractions to end users. However, any delegation solution should try to balance the level of controls delegated to end users with the security constraints of the provider. In this paper, we propose a SDN-based framework to facilitate delegation of some network controls to end users, providing the means to monitor and configure their own slices of the underlying networks. Using two instantiations of this framework, we illustrate the tradeoffs between security and the level of network abstractions provided to end users.

We study the scaling properties of a georouting scheme in a wireless multi-hop network of $n$ mobile nodes. Our aim is to increase the network capacity quasi linearly with $n$ while keeping the average delay bounded. In our model, mobile nodes move according to an i.i.d. random walk with velocity $v$ and transmit packets to randomly chosen destinations. The average packet delivery delay of our scheme is of order $1/v$ and it achieves the network capacity of order $\frac{n}{\log n\log\log n}$. This shows a practical throughput-delay trade-off, in particular when compared with the seminal result of Gupta and Kumar which shows network capacity of order $\sqrt{n/\log n}$ and negligible delay and the groundbreaking result of Grossglausser and Tse which achieves network capacity of order $n$ but with an average delay of order $\sqrt{n}/v$. We confirm the generality of our analytical results using simulations under various interference models., This work has been submitted to IEEE INFOCOM 2012

This paper evaluates the performance of IPv4 and IPv6 networks in the absence of link layer protection. Behavior of both the networks has been discussed and simulated in case of ideal scenario, low noise, medium noise, high noise and very high noise environment. Transmission behavior at each router is observed and computed to understand the comparative performance of IPv4 and IPv6 datagram's. Our simulation results for throughput, transmission time, number of corrupted packets and number of retransmissions clearly indicates that IPv6 performs better in ideal and low noise scenario as there is no checksum computed at each router and number of retransmissions for corrupted packets are also less. As the system moves from ideal to high noise, a decline in the performance of IPv6 is observed. IPv4 on the other hand produces better throughput as corrupted packets are verified and discarded at each router which saves extra wastage of bandwidth.