Search

Objetivo: Los inhibidores de la aromatasa (IA) se han asociado con una pérdida de masa ósea acelerada y un mayor riesgo de fracturas osteoporóticas. Con este trabajo se pretendió evaluar los factores de riesgo de fractura incidente en pacientes con cáncer de mama que reciben IA. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo-observacional de cohorte de mujeres con cáncer de mama que inician tratamiento con IA (cohorte B-ABLE). Las pacientes realizaron tratamiento durante 5 años o bien 2 ó 3 años si habían recibido previamente tamoxifeno. Se les evaluó la salud ósea desde el inicio del tratamiento hasta un año después de finalizar dicho tratamiento mediante densitometría ósea, marcadores de remodelado óseo, niveles de vitamina D y una radiografía antero-posterior y otra lateral de columna. Se realizó el cálculo de riesgo de fractura mediante la herramienta FRAX® antes de iniciar IA. Se utilizaron modelos de Cox para calcular los ratios de riesgo (HR [IC 95%]) de fractura. Resultados: Un total de 943 pacientes fueron incluidas en el estudio. El 5,4% sufrieron una fractura incidente, la mayoría durante el tratamiento con IA, aunque un 21,5% ocurrieron durante el primer año después de finalizar la terapia. La mayoría de las fracturas incidentes fueron vertebrales clínicas (29,4%) y de Colles (31,4%). El 86,3% de las pacientes tenían un diagnóstico de osteopenia u osteoporosis en el momento de la fractura y el 33% tenían los niveles de β-CTX (isómero β del telopéptido carboxiterminal del colágeno tipo I) por encima de la normalidad. Las pacientes diagnosticadas de osteoporosis o con riesgo de fractura al inicio del estudio fueron tratadas con antirresortivos óseos. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en el riesgo de fractura entre pacientes con y sin tratamiento antirresortivo: HR=1,75 [IC 95%: 0,88 a 3,46]. Tampoco se encontraron diferencias entre las pacientes que habían hecho tratamiento previo con tamoxifeno respecto a las que no (HR=1,00 [IC 95%: 0,39 a 2,56]). La herramienta FRAX® dio valores de media dentro del rango de riesgo intermedio, con 13 pacientes con valores de alto riesgo de fractura principal. Conclusiones: El principal factor de riesgo detectado para fractura incidente en pacientes tratadas con IA es el diagnóstico de osteopenia u osteoporosis. El cálculo de la herramienta FRAX® y la determinación de los niveles de β-CTX son herramientas útiles para identificar a pacientes de alto riesgo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objetive: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been associated with an accelerated loss of bone mass and an increased risk of osteoporosis fractures. This study assesses the risk factors for incident fracture in breast cancer patients receiving AI. Material and methods: Prospective-observational cohort study of women with breast cancer who begin treatment with AI (B-ABLE cohort). Patients were treated for 5 years or 2 or 3 years if they had previously received tamoxifen. Bone health was assessed from the beginning of the treatment until one year post treatment by bone densitometry, bone remodeling markers, vitamin D levels and an anteroposterior and lateral spine radiography. The fracture risk calculation was performed using the FRAX® tool before starting AI. Cox models were used to calculate the risk ratios (HR [95% CI]) of fracture. Results: A total of 943 patients were included in the study. 5.4% suffered an incident fracture, most during AI treatment, although 21.5% occurred during the first year after the end of therapy. Most of the incident fractures were clinical vertebral (29.4%) and Colles (31.4%). 86.3% of the patients had a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis at the time of the fracture and 33% had the levels of β-CTX (β isomer of the carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen) above normal. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis or at risk of fracture at the start of the study were treated with bone antiresorptives. No significant differences in fracture risk were found between patients with and without antiresorptive therapy: HR=1.75 [95% CI: 0.88 to 3.46]. Nor were differences found among patients who had previously treated with tamoxifen compared to those who did not (HR=1.00 [95% CI 0.39 to 2.56]). The FRAX® tool gave average values within the intermediate risk range, with 13 patients with high risk of major fracture values. Conclusions: The main risk factor detected for incident fracture in patients treated with AI is the diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. The calculation of the FRAX® tool and the determination of β-CTX levels are useful tools to identify high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are effective adjuvant endocrine therapies for breast cancer patients, although they have been associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) loss has been previously demonstrated, although it may vary among AI-treated patients. This study aims to identify the genetic basis associated with TBS change by studying steroidogenic pathway genes. Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort studies prospectively postmenopausal women with breast cancer under treatment with AI. TBS is calculated from the raw data acquired in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at the outset of the study and at the end of AI-treatment. The relative TBS change was calculated as the percentage variation of the TBS value at the end of treatment from baseline. To study the possible genetic association, nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in genes CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HDE3B2, HDE17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, GC, CYP27B1, VDR and CYP24A1. The possible relationship between genes and TBS changes was studied by multiple linear regression, considering models of dominant, recessive and additive genetic inheritance. Results: The study included 212 women that had not been treated with bisphosphonates and had available TBS data. Half of the patients had been treated previously with tamoxifen. The percentage of intraindividual TBS change was -0.04% [95% CI: -0.05 to -0.03; p<0.001] at the end of AI treatment. The SNP rs6013897 in the gene CYP24A1 showed a significant association with TBS reduction [p=0.03565; coefficient ß (95% CI) = -1.55 (-2.98 to -0.11)]. Conclusions: The CYP24A1 gene could be involved in the phenotypic variability found in bone microarchitecture deterioration during AI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To identify microRNAs (miRNAs) differentially expressed in bone samples with osteoporotic fracture compared with healthy bones. Methods: Total RNA was extracted from fresh trabecular bone of the femoral neck of women undergoing hip replacement surgery, either because to osteoporotic fracture (n=6) or in the absence of osteoarthritis osteoporosis (based on BMD) (n=6). The samples were hybridized on an array of miRNAs and PCA diagrams and heat map were made. To compare expression levels, >1.5 times and a value p<0.05 Student's T test (corrected for multiple testing) was set as a threshold of significant change. Results: Both PCA analysis and the heat map showed a samples grouping whether there was fracture or not. 790 were detected miRNAs in bone samples, 82 of which were altered in the osteoporotic samples. After validation in another panel of 6 samples 6 osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic by PCR real time of the most significant miRNAs, and for which there was a test available, the miRNAs, miR-320a and miR-22-3p were confirmed. These two miRNAs were detected in cultures of primary osteoblasts, although they did not maintain the same pattern of expression in total bone samples. Conclusions: We have shown that there are differences in the expression of miRNAs in samples with osteoporotic fracture. This opens prospects for research and design of new therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Osteoporosis & Mineral Metabolism / Revista de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral (Spanish edition) is the property of Ibanez y Plaza and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze bone mineral density (BMD) changes throughout aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in clinical cases and also consider its association with the CYP11A1 gene and the BMD variation after treatment. Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort is a prospective study of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, in AI treatment. BMD variation was analyzed during AI treatment, as well as the differences those patients who were treated and not treated previously with tamoxifen (TMX). Three polymorphisms (rs4077581, rs11632698 and rs900798) of the CYP11A1 gene were genotyped for their association with BMD variation. Results: TMX-treated patients presented more rapid BMD loss than those who did not undergo prior TMX treatment (60% less in spine and 46% in femur at 2 years and 70% less in the spine and 63% in the femur at 3 years). However, no significant BMD loss was detected after treatment in either group. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with BMD variation in the femur at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: BMD was reduced more rapidly in patients with prior TMX treatment than in those who only received AI, although no significant differences were detected after treatment. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were associated with BMD variation in response to AI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The RANK/RANKL/OPG system is involved in the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture. Our study seeks to evaluate if there are SNPs in the 3'UTR region of the RANK gene associated with osteoporotic phenotypes. Material and methods: Seven genetic variants in 1,098 women from the BARCOS cohort were genotyped, and their association with BMD and osteoporotic fractures evaluated. An interaction with SNP rs9594738 in the RANKL gene which was previously associated with BMD was tested. Results: None of the SNPs were associated significantly with BMD. SNP rs78326403 was associated with wrist/forearm fractures (Log-additive model odds ratio (OR)=3.12 [IC 95%: 1.69 ; 5.75]; p=7.16x10-4), while SNP rs884205 was associated with fractures of the spinal column (OR=4.05 Recessive; [95% CI: 1.59 ; 10.35]; p=8.24x10-3). Lastly, an interaction was detected between SNP rs9594738 from RANKL and rs78326403 from RANK on the presence of fracture (p=0.039). The analysis of the effects of combined genotypes rs9594738 and rs78326403 pointed to an increase in the prevalence of fractures in subjects with a greater number of unfavourable alleles, the ORs being 2.76 [95% CI: 1.30 ; 5.81]; p=0.007) and 5.14 [95% CI: 1.37 ; 15.67]; p=0.007) for 2 and ≥3 unfavourable alleles respectively, in comparison with none/1. Conclusions: Two SNPs in 3'UTR from the RANK gene predispose to site-dependent osteoporotic fracture. An interaction with SNP rs9594738 from RANKL suggests an additive effect of BMD and bone strength. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]