Search

Introduction: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is not a widely adopted procedure due to its technical difficulties. This study aimed to share the experience in setting up this novel procedure and to report the learning curve for such a procedure at a low-volume district hospital in Hong Kong., Methods: This case series comprised 71 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections that were performed by a single endoscopist without experience in gastric or colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Lesion characteristics, procedure time per unit area of tumour, en-bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, complications, and length of stay were recorded prospectively. Results were compared for two consecutive periods to study the learning curve., Results: Overall, 41 (57.7%) tumours were located in the right colon, 21 (29.6%) in the left colon, and nine (12.7%) in the rectum. The median tumour area was 4 cm(2) (range, 0.25-16 cm(2)). The median operating time was 105 (range, 47-342) minutes. The median procedure time per unit area of tumour was 24.9 min/cm(2). There was one instance of intra-operative bleeding that required conversion to laparoscopic colectomy. There was no postoperative haemorrhage. The overall perforation rate was 15.5%, in which one required conversion to laparoscopic colectomy. The overall morbidity rate was 16.9% and there was no mortality. The median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 0-11 days). The overall en-bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate was 81.2% and 58.0%, respectively. Comparison of the two study periods revealed that procedure time per unit area of tumour decreased significantly from 31.5 min/cm(2) to 21.5 min/cm(2) (P=0.032). The en-bloc resection rate improved from 78.8% to 83.3% (P=0.15). The R0 resection rate improved significantly from 39.4% to 75.0% (P<0.01)., Conclusion: Untutored colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible with acceptable clinical outcomes at a low-volume district hospital in Hong Kong.

Objectives: To review the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing non-toxic thyroid nodules and determine what factors are predictive of malignancy in patients with indeterminate cytology results., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Regional hospital, Hong Kong., Patients: Patients with non-toxic thyroid nodules undergoing thyroidectomy from December 1999 to December 2003., Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of fine-needle aspiration cytology, predictive factors for malignancy in patients with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology results., Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of fine-needle aspiration cytology were 54%, 100%, 100%, and 75% respectively. For the 92 patients with fine-needle aspiration cytology reported as 'indeterminate for malignancy', aspiration cytology subgroup (P=0.005) and age (P=0.001) were significant risk factors for diagnosing malignancy., Conclusions: Fine-needle aspiration cytology has high positive predictive value for thyroid cancer, enabling us to 'rule-in' malignant lesions with confidence. Among those with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology, atypical cell lesions and age greater than 40 years conferred increased risk of malignancy.

Objective: To test the feasibility of needlescopic cholecystectomy using a two-port technique with 3-mm miniaturised instruments., Design: Prospective study., Setting: Regional hospital, Hong Kong., Patients: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy from September 2001 to August 2002., Intervention: Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy all performed or supervised by a single laparoscopic surgeon., Main Outcome Measures: Conversion of the procedure, the operating time, postoperative analgesic requirement, pain score using the 10-cm visual analog scale, complications, and the postoperative stay. To determine the technical difficulty of this new technique, the data from the first 50 patients were compared with those of the latter 50. Outcome variables were also compared with a group of 58 patients operated on with the standard two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a previous randomised trial., Results: One conversion to open cholecystectomy was reported. Three patients required the enlargement of epigastric port to a size of 5 mm and six patients required an additional port to complete the operation. The median operating time was 62 minutes (range, 33-168 minutes). The median pain score was 3.5 (range, 0-9) and the median postoperative stay was 2 days (range, 1-14 days). Six patients had postoperative complications. When the first 50 patients were compared with the latter 50, there were no differences in the conversion rate, operating time, complication rate, and duration of hospital stay. However, the latter 50 patients had significantly lower pain scores (median, 3.5 vs 4.9; P=0.007) and faster resumption of diet (median, 5 vs 9 hours; P<0.001). The median operating time of needlescopic cholecystectomy was notably longer (62 vs 46 minutes; P<0.001) compared with that of the two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients undergoing needlescopic cholecystectomy had a better resumption of diet (median, 5 vs 7 hours; P<0.001) and less postoperative pain (overall pain score, median, 3.5 vs 4.8; P=0.052) than the two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. Pain scores at individual port sites were also lower in needlescopic cholecystectomy group (umbilical port: median, 3 vs 4.4, P=0.015; epigastric port: median, 2.0 vs 3.6, P=0.036)., Conclusion: Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy is technically feasible and may further improve the surgical outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and cosmesis. It can be considered for routine practice by surgeons who are familiar with the two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique.