Search

The dwarf gerbil (Gerbillus nanus) is broadly distributed in Asia, with a range that encompasses altitudinally diverse terrain, including two major mountain ranges. Previous studies have shown this species to be generally varied across its geographic range, both genetically and morphologically. Physical barriers (e.g. mountains) and geographic distance (i.e. isolation by distance [IBD]) are expected to reduce dispersal rates, and consequently could lead to cranial morphological differentiation among populations. Adaptation to local environments is also expected to lead to cranial morphological differentiation among populations. Here, I test these hypotheses by examining variation in cranial shape and size across the geographic distribution of G. nanus using geometric morphometric analysis. Based on a sample of 473 specimens from throughout its distribution, G. nanus populations do not seem to show biologically meaningful variation in cranial shape. Cranial size, on the other hand, did show geographic variation—yet, this variation does not seem to show strong patterns of IBD nor adaptation to local environments, which could indicate that the geographic variation in the cranial size of G. nanus populations may be accounted for by factors unexamined in this study. A geometric morphometric analysis of 473 specimens from throughout the broad distribution of the dwarf gerbil (Gerbillus nanus) detected no biologically meaningful variation in cranial shape. Cranial size did show geographic variation—however, this variation does not seem to show strong patterns consistent with isolation by distance, nor with adaptation to local environments, which could indicate that the geographic variation in the cranial size of G. nanus populations may be accounted for by factors unexamined in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent molecular studies in gerbils found multiple instances of discordance between molecular and morphological phylogenies. In this study, we analyse the largest molecular data set to date of gerbils and their sister group the deomyines to estimate their phylogenetic relationships. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian analyses were largely concordant, and both generally had high levels of node support. For gerbils, the results were generally concordant with previous molecular phylogenies based on allozymes, chromosomes, DNA/ DNA hybridization and DNA sequences, and discordant with morphological phylogenies. None of the traditional gerbil tribes and subtribes were monophyletic. In addition, paraphyly was found in the genera Gerbillus, Gerbilliscus and Meriones as well as in five subgenera within Dipodillus, Gerbillurus and Meriones. Short branches separating taxa in small clusters within Dipodillus and Meriones suggest synonymy. Within deomyines, all genera and subgenera were monophyletic; however, two species groups within Acomys appear to contain synonymous taxa. We also find support for the discordance between molecular and morphological phylogenies in gerbils being partly due to convergent adaptations to arid environments, primarily in the suite of traits associated with inflation of the tympanic bullae. Relative bullar size does appear to be a desert adaptation and is correlated with aridity independent of phylogeny. Further, it varies more strongly along bioclimatic clines than between binary habitat classifications (desert versus mesic). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]