1. Resin Composite Materials for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations: A Comparison of Selected Mechanical Properties
- Author
-
Wojciech Grzebieluch, Urszula Kaczmarek, and Marcin Mikulewicz
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,Ceramics ,Materials science ,Article Subject ,Resin composite ,Biomedical Engineering ,Modulus ,Health Informatics ,02 engineering and technology ,Bending ,Indentation hardness ,03 medical and health sciences ,R5-920 ,0302 clinical medicine ,Flexural strength ,Flexural Strength ,Materials Testing ,Medical technology ,Humans ,R855-855.5 ,Composite material ,Weibull distribution ,Flexural modulus ,Weibull modulus ,030206 dentistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Computer-Aided Design ,Surgery ,0210 nano-technology ,Biotechnology ,Research Article - Abstract
Objective. The aim was to evaluate the flexural strength, flexural modulus, microhardness, Weibull modulus, and characteristic strength of six resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs-GR, Tetric CAD-TE, Brilliant Crios-CR, Katana Avencia-AV, Cerasmart-CS, and Shofu Block HC-HC). Methods. Flexural strength and flexural modulus were measured using a three-point bending test and microhardness using the Vickers method. Weibull analysis was also performed. Results. The materials showed flexural strength ranging from 120.38 (HC) to 186.02 MPa (GR), flexural modulus from 8.26 (HC) to 16.95 GPa (GR), and microhardness from 70.85 (AV) to 140.43 (GR). Weibull modulus and characteristic strength ranged from 16.35 (CS) to 34.98 (TE) and from 123.45 MPa (HC) to 190.3 MPa (GR), respectively. Conclusions. GR, TE, and CR presented significantly higher flexural strength, modulus, Weibull modulus, and characteristic strength than the others.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF