1. Letter to the Editor from Colle et al
- Author
-
Raphael Colle, Thierry André, Yves Menu, Service d'Oncologie Médicale [CHU Saint -Antoine], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Sorbonne Université - Faculté de Médecine (SU FM), and Sorbonne Université (SU)
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,tumor ,Letter to the editor ,Colorectal cancer ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Immunology ,gastrointestinal neoplasms ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,In patient ,Pseudoprogression ,Objective response ,RC254-282 ,Pharmacology ,business.industry ,Tumor shrinkage ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Microsatellite instability ,biomarkers ,medicine.disease ,genome instability ,3. Good health ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cohort ,genetic markers ,Molecular Medicine ,immunotherapy ,business - Abstract
In their article, Fucà et al highlight that early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We are surprised that no cases of pseudoprogression (PSPD) were reported in their study. PSPDs were described under ICI in patients treated for MSI/dMMR mCRC. In a cohort of 123 patients treated with anti-PD1±antiCTL-4 for MSI/dMMR mCRC, we reported 12 patients with PSPD, representing 10% of the cohort. Of 12 patients with PSPD, 8 secondary achieved an objective response and were alive and free of progression at the data lock. Conversely, in Fucà’s article, no PSDP was observed and the patients with primary radiological progression (21.7%) had a poor overall survival. These differences between the two series could be probably explained by the following points. First, Fucà et al use RECIST 1.1 criteria for radiological evaluation. Second, the first imaging was done after 8–9 weeks of treatment in Fucà’s article, which may be late to detect PSPD. In conclusion, if the first evaluation is made during the first 3 months of treatment, using iRECIST criteria seems mandatory to avoid stopping treatment prematurely, especially in patients receiving anti-PD1 alone.
- Published
- 2021