Search

Your search keyword '"Patricia Murrieta-Flores"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Patricia Murrieta-Flores" Publisher hal ccsd
3 results on '"Patricia Murrieta-Flores"'

1. The Long and Winding Road: Combining Least Cost Paths and Network Analysis Techniques for Settlement Location Analysis and Predictive Modelling

Author

Brughmans, Tom, Nuninger, Laure, Bertoncello, Frédérique, Verhagen, Philip, Earl, Graeme, University of Southampton, Laboratoire Chrono-environnement - CNRS - UBFC (UMR 6249) (LCE), Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Culture et Environnements, Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen-Age (CEPAM), Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA), Cultural Landscape and Urban Environment (CLUE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Philip Verhagen, Graeme Earl, Archaeological Computing Research Group, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux (UAR 3124) (MSHE), PHC Van Gogh 2010-2011 (MAE), Iza Romanowska, Patricia Murrieta Flores, Costas Papadopoulos and Angeliki Chrysanthi, Projet IHAPMA, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux (MSHE), Cultural Landscape and Urban Environment ( CLUE ), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] ( VU ), University of Southampton (Southampton, UK), Laboratoire Chrono-environnement ( LCE ), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté ( UBFC ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ), Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux ( MSHE ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ), Culture et Environnements, Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen-Age ( CEPAM ), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis ( UNS ), Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), and Iza Romanowska, Patricia Murrieta Flores, Costas Papadopoulos and Angeliki Chrysanthi

Subjects
010506 paleontology, regional comparison, [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, Movement, Network science, facteurs socio-culturels, 01 natural sciences, diachronic comparison, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, 0601 history and archaeology, comparaison diachronique, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, comparaison régionale, [SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics, 060102 archaeology, Least Cost Paths, Predictive modelling, Space Syntax, Roman period, archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts, période romaine, [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, GIS, Accessibility, [INFO.INFO-MO]Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, landscape archaeology, socio-cultural factors, [ SHS.ARCHEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, Modélisation prédictive, Network Analysis
Abstract

International audience; In this paper, we describe an exploratory analysis of the possibilities of combining least cost path analysis and network analysis techniques. Accessibility is a potentially important site location factor. So far, the definition of accessibility has been approached through the creation of accumulated cost surfaces and least cost paths. However, these methods do not provide direct information on the foci of movement. Starting from networks created from least cost paths, network analysis and space syntax were used to obtain additional information on the structural features of the network. It is concluded that both techniques can be used with least cost path-based networks, and will provide new insights into the characteristics of the network. For most applications however the Space syntax measures that take the geographical dimension into account seem to be preferable to the simple network analysis measures used here.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Formalization of scientific process and conceptual modelling for the study of territorial and products distribution dynamics (ArchaeDyn II programme)

Author

Laure Saligny, Xavier Rodier, Frédérique Bertoncello, François Favory, Élise Fovet, Cristina Gandini, Estelle Gauthier, Jessica Giraud, Murielle Georges-Leroy, Nicolas Poirier, Olivier Weller, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme de Dijon ( MSH Dijon (MSHD) ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Bourgogne ( UB ), Cités, Territoires, Environnement et Sociétés ( CITERES ), Université de Tours-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Culture et Environnements, Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen-Age ( CEPAM ), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis ( UNS ), Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Université Côte d'Azur ( UCA ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux ( MSHE ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ), Laboratoire Chrono-environnement ( LCE ), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté ( UBFC ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ), Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique ( CRBC Brest ), Université de Brest ( UBO ) -Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société ( IBSHS ), Université de Brest ( UBO ), Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés ( TRACES ), École des hautes études en sciences sociales ( EHESS ) -Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès ( UT2J ) -Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication ( MCC ) -Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives ( Inrap ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Trajectoires, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne ( UP1 ) -Université Paris Nanterre ( UPN ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Graeme Earl, Tim Sly, Angeliki Chrysanthi, Patricia Murrieta-Flores, Constantinos Papadopoulos, Iza Romanowska and David Wheatley, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme de Dijon (MSH Dijon (MSHD)), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Cités, Territoires, Environnement et Sociétés (CITERES), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Tours (UT), Culture et Environnements, Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen-Age (CEPAM), Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA), Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux (MSHE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Laboratoire Chrono-environnement - CNRS - UBFC (UMR 6249) (LCE), Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique (CRBC Brest), Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (IBSHS), Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre de recherche bretonne et celtique (CRBC), Université de Brest (UBO)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES), Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés (TRACES), Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (MCC)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Trajectoires - UMR 8215, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Graeme Earl, Tim Sly, Angeliki Chrysanthi, Patricia Murrieta-Flores, Constantinos Papadopoulos, Iza Romanowska and David Wheatley, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de l'Environnement Claude Nicolas Ledoux (UAR 3124) (MSHE), Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (MCC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Saligny, Laure, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Tours

Subjects
[SHS.ARCHEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, [SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics, formalization, [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, Models, consumption areas, [ SHS.ARCHEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, agricultural areas, [SHS.STAT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics, settlement patterns, analytical process, [ SHS.STAT ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics
Abstract

International audience; The ArchaeDyn team has investigated territorial dynamics by comparing areas over long time spans between the Neolithic and Modern times. Datasets on various themes have been shared and indicators and analytical models produced. This paper presents both the formalization of the scientific process used in the ArchaeDyn programme and a conceptual model of the systems and components so that synchronic and diachronic comparisons can be made. The aim is to clarify the transition from an archaeological feature (a site or an artefact) or a recording unit (survey area) as the input, to the characterization of spaces describing a system as the output. The approach is described by the successive steps corresponding to semantic, spatial or temporal analytical processes from the prospecting level to the level of complex objects such as the territories and spaces under study. These complex objects¬-- consumption areas, agricultural areas and settlement patterns--are the subsystems in the dynamics of human territorial occupation. The main contribution of this formalization is that it describes synthetically the hypotheses tested and the approach implemented. In addition, it provides a collective validation of the research team's reasoning.

Published
2012

3. Crafting Archaeological Methodologies

Author

Gonzalez-Pérez, César, Hug, Charlotte, Incipit, Incipit - CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Centre de Recherche en Informatique de Paris 1 (CRI), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1), Graeme Earl, Tim Sly, Angeliki Chrysanthi, Patricia Murrieta-Flores, Constantinos Papadopoulos, and Iza Romanowska and David Wheatley

Subjects
Process, Situational Method Engineering, [SHS.ARCHEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Archaeology and Prehistory, Methodology
Abstract

International audience; Archaeological projects vary enormously in size, complexity, object of study, timescale and other characteristics. Therefore, finding the best possible methodology for any given project is often a difficult task, and most of the time we keep wondering whether the methodology that we are using is, in fact, the best possible one. An inadequate methodological choice can ruin many months worth of fieldwork, bias the interpretation of data, and slow down or impede cross-project comparison of results. Ideally, a methodology should be perfectly adjusted to the needs of the project; it should be based on well-proven techniques and knowledge; it should be clearly expressed so that it can be unambiguously enacted, communicated and shared; and it should be enhanced over time from the information gathered while it is applied. The approach known as method engineering has been successfully used in some disciplines to achieve these objectives. Method engineering is an approach to the crafting of methodologies that conceives a methodology not as a monolithic black box, but as an assembly of pre-existing components that are selected and composed together from a repository. Each component in the repository encapsulates a proven, reusable "atom" of knowledge with clear indications on how it should be used and combined with other components. Method components often refer to the process to be carried out (i.e. the tasks), the outcomes to generate or inputs to take into account (i.e. products), the people and teams that actually do all this (i.e. producers), and the temporal organisation of all the previous (i.e. stages). Using method engineering, the characteristics of the archaeological project at hand determine what pre-existing tasks, products, producers and stages are selected from the repository and assembled together in order to create a purpose-fit, well proven methodology that can be clearly expressed, enacted and enhanced over time, and suggests what additional method components need to be created specifically for the project. This paper offers a brief introduction to method engineering from the perspective of the humanities and social sciences, and shows how method engineering can be valuable to archaeology in particular. Some examples are given of how a sample archaeological methodology can be put together from the components in a repository. The ISO/IEC 24744 method engineering standard is used as an ontology of methodologies.

Published
2012

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results