1. Feasibility of using a dose-area product ratio as beam quality specifier for photon beams with small field sizes
- Author
-
Maria Pimpinella, A. Ostrowsky, F. Delaunay, J. Daures, Maïwenn Le Roy, J. Gouriou, L. Silvi, S. Dufreneix, Didier Vermesse, Claudio Caporali, Assunta Petrucci, Vanessa De Coste, Line Sommier, A.S. Guerra, Jean-Marc Bordy, B. Rapp, Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti (ENEA-INMRI), Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNHB), Département Métrologie Instrumentation & Information (DM2I), Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST), Direction de Recherche Technologique (CEA) (DRT (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Direction de Recherche Technologique (CEA) (DRT (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay, European Project: EMRP-HLT09,MetrExtRT, Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Département d'instrumentation Numérique (DIN (CEA-LIST)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), De Coste, V., Silvi, L., Guerra, A. S., Caporali, C., and Pimpinella, M.
- Subjects
Monte Carlo method ,General Physics and Astronomy ,DIODE ,7. Clean energy ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,MONTE-CARLO ,ionization chamber ,Ionization ,Cobalt Radioisotopes ,[STAT.AP]Statistics [stat]/Applications [stat.AP] ,DAP ratio ,Dose-area product ,Beam quality ,Small photon beams ,Air ,Uncertainty ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,General Medicine ,DOSIMETRY ,simulation ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Absorbed dose ,DIAMOND DETECTORS ,Laser beam quality ,ionizing radiation ,Monte Carlo Method ,SYNTHETIC MICRODIAMOND DETECTORS ,RADIOSURGERY ,Materials science ,Field (physics) ,Biophysics ,DIAMOND ,[PHYS.NEXP]Physics [physics]/Nuclear Experiment [nucl-ex] ,03 medical and health sciences ,SCINTILLATOR ,Optics ,MONTE CARLO ,Dosimetry ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Computer Simulation ,IMRT ,Radiometry ,DETECTOR ,radiotherapy ,Photons ,business.industry ,Water ,[INFO.INFO-MO]Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation ,Dose area product ,MV ,[SPI.OPTI]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Optics / Photonic ,Particle Accelerators ,business ,Beam (structure) ,SYSTEM - Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of using the ratio of dose-area product at 20 cm and 10 cm water depths (DAPR20,10) as a beam quality specifier for radiotherapy photon beams with field diameter below 2 cm. Methods: Dose-area product was determined as the integral of absorbed dose to water (Dw) over a surface larger than the beam size. 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams with field diameters from 0.75 cm to 2 cm were considered. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to calculate energy-dependent dosimetric parameters and to study the DAPR20,10 properties. Aspects relevant to DAPR20,10 measurement were explored using large-area plane-parallel ionization chambers with different diameters. Results: DAPR20,10 was nearly independent of field size in line with the small differences among the corresponding mean beam energies. Both MC and experimental results showed a dependence of DAPR20,10 on the measurement setup and the surface over which Dw is integrated. For a given setup, DAPR20,10 values obtained using ionization chambers with different air-cavity diameters agreed with one another within 0.4%, after the application of MC correction factors accounting for effects due to the chamber size. DAPR20,10 differences among the small field sizes were within 1% and sensitivity to the beam energy resulted similar to that of established beam quality specifiers based on the point measurement of Dw. Conclusions: For a specific measurement setup and integration area, DAPR20,10 proved suitable to specify the beam quality of small photon beams for the selection of energy-dependent dosimetric parameters. © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF