1. Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI‐MESH registry
- Author
-
X Fritel, R Tayrac, J Keizer, S Campagne‐Loiseau, M Cosson, P Ferry, X Deffieux, J‐P Lucot, L Wagner, P Debodinance, C Saussine, A‐C Pizzoferrato, C Carlier‐Guérin, T Thubert, L Panel, P‐O Bosset, E Nkounkou, R Ramanah, T Boisramé, T Charles, C Raiffort, A Charvériat, S Ragot, A Fauconnier, Adnan Aboukassem, Chérif Akladios, Emmanuelle Arsène, Jean‐Sébastien Aucouturier, Georges Bader, Emmanuel Bailly, Jean‐Jacques Baldauf, Stéphanie Bartolo, Marie‐Line Barussaud, Fanny Béchard, Simon Bernardeau, Clément Biscans, Deepak Boodhun, Revaz Botchorishvili, Michel Boukaram, Aude Brams, Laurent Bressler, Clément Bruhat, Michel Canis, Victor Cavillon, Olivier Celhay, Armand Chevrot, Pierre Collinet, Arnaud Cornille, Pierre Costa, Christophe Courtieu, Laurent Courtois, Sandra Curinier, Eric Darnis, Pierre‐Olivier Delpech, Véronique Delporte, Anne Dubois, Emilie Faller, Brigitte Fatton, Cécile Féyeux, Victor Gabriele, Pierre Gadonneix, Olivier Garbin, Florent Genty, Géraldine Giraudet, Pascale Gres, Pauline Gueudry, Jean‐François Haab, Audrey Hedde, Aline Host, Michel Hummel, Estelle Jean dit Gautier, Aminata Kane, Sophie Gouic, Isabelle Teuff, Gil Lebreton, Lise Lecointre, Grégoire Léon, Yolande Maisonnette, Lucile Martin, Aurore Marx, Pascal Mouracade, Corinne Palamara, Petit Nicolas, Caroline Pettenati, Laurence Peyrat, Pierre Pillot, Jean‐Luc Pouly, Clothilde Poupon, Michel Prudhomme, Benoît Rabishong, Hélène Ricard, Jérémie Ripoche, Géraldine Rivaux, Jennifer Salerno, Delphine Salet‐Lizée, Richard Sarfati, Maxence Sarradin, Elodie Schuller, An Segaert, François Stoll, Yannick Thirouard, Caroline Trichot, Mélusine Turck, David Vandendriessche, Edouard Vaucel, Sarah Vieillefosse, Anne Villot, Denis Vinatier, Etienne Vincens, Marie Vinchant, Béatrice Vinson‐Bonnet, Soraya Wapler, Sophie Warembourg, CIC - Poitiers, Université de Poitiers-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers)-Direction Générale de l'Organisation des Soins (DGOS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers), Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau [Nîmes] (CHU Nîmes), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), CHU Estaing [Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Lille, Hôpital Saint-Louis de La Rochelle (CH La Rochelle), AP-HP - Hôpital Antoine Béclère [Clamart], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul de Lille, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), Université catholique de Lille (UCL)-Université catholique de Lille (UCL), CH Dunkerque, CHU Strasbourg, CHU Caen, Normandie Université (NU)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), CH de Châtellerault, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Clinique Beau Soleil [Montpellier], Hôpital Foch [Suresnes], Centre Hospitalier de Béthune (CH Béthune), GHT de l'Artois, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon (CHRU Besançon), Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye - CHIPS [Poissy], Fritel, Xavier, Groupe Hospitalier de l'Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), and centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye - CHIPS [Poissy]
- Subjects
Reoperation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Multivariate analysis ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Population ,registry ,[SDV.MHEP.GEO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Gynecology and obstetrics ,Risk profile ,03 medical and health sciences ,Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,surgical complication ,Recurrence ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Registries ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,Pelvic organ ,education.field_of_study ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Prolapse surgery ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Hazard ratio ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Middle Aged ,Surgical Mesh ,Vaginal repair ,pelvic organ prolapse ,Confidence interval ,3. Good health ,Surgery ,[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] ,[SDV.MHEP.GEO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Gynecology and obstetrics ,mesh ,Vagina ,Female ,Laparoscopy ,Longitudinal study ,business - Abstract
Objective To assess the incidence of serious complications and reoperations for recurrence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and compare the three most common types of repair. Design Prospective cohort study using a registry. Setting Nineteen French surgical centres. Population A total of 2309 women participated between 2017 and 2019. Methods A multivariate analysis including an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used to obtain three comparable groups. Main outcome measures Serious complications and subsequent reoperations for POP recurrence. Results The median follow-up time was 17.6 months. Surgeries were native tissue vaginal repairs (n = 504), transvaginal mesh placements (n = 692) and laparoscopic sacropexies with mesh (n = 1113). Serious complications occurred among 52 women (2.3%), and reoperation for POP recurrence was required for 32 women (1.4%). At 1 year the cumulative weighted incidence of serious complications was 1.8% for native tissue vaginal repair, 3.9% for transvaginal mesh and 2.2% for sacropexy, and the rates for reoperation for recurrence of POP were 1.5, 0.7 and 1.1%, respectively. Compared with native tissue vaginal repair, the risk of serious complications was higher in the transvaginal mesh group (weighted hazard ratio, wHR 3.84, 95% CI 2.43-6.08) and the sacropexy group (wHR 2.48, 95% CI 1.45-4.23), whereas the risk of reoperation for prolapse recurrence was lower in both the transvaginal mesh (wHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.39) and sacropexy (wHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.47) groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that native tissue vaginal repairs have the lowest risk of serious complications but the highest risk of reoperation for recurrence. These results are useful for informing women and for shared decision making. Tweetable abstract Laparoscopic sacropexy had fewer serious complications than transvaginal mesh and fewer reoperations for recurrence than vaginal repair.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF