Search

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home message • Integrated weed management has performed better than the Baseline system across most of the indices measured as part of the farming systems trial • Additional biomass production has not correlated with additional yield, relative to other systems using the same crop rotation • The improved performance has come at a nutritional cost which will need to be managed if implemented on a broader scale.

Take home messages • Match optimal flowering period to growing environment to maximise grain yield potential. • One variety doesn’t fit all; there are no commercially available varieties that are broadly adapted across a wide range of sowing times or growing environments. • Optimising variety phenology and sowing time combinations achieves grain yield stability across a wide sowing window. • Probability of sowing opportunities will influence variety choice and sowing time decisions.