1. Über inhumane Praktiken der Frauenheilkunde im Nationalsozialismus und ihre Opfer
- Author
-
Kindermann G and Stauber M
- Subjects
media_common.quotation_subject ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Shame ,Regret ,Nazism ,Context (language use) ,language.human_language ,German ,Law ,Political science ,Maternity and Midwifery ,language ,Nazi Germany ,Conscience ,media_common ,Criminal negligence - Abstract
In our opinion German gynaecology has failed to adequately face what came to pass during the Nazi period. This can be proved objectively, for there is no evidence that, after 1945, gynaecology had in any way cared to take notice--either thermatically or medically--of the thousands of victims of inhuman practices such as forced termination of pregnancy, compulsory sterilisation and the like. During the past 50 years recollections of enforced sterilisations, compulsory abortions, deliberate and hence criminal negligence and problematic approaches in research and teaching were almost completely banished from the area of conscious awareness and largely suppressed or silently ignored. Most of the medical directors of Departments of Gynaecology of German universities shared this view whenever they were questioned on the connections between gynaecology and Nazism. Now that two generations have passed it seems possible to examine and explore with less guilt feelings and shame the immensely fateful role of gynaecology in that context. Accent should be on the fate of the victims of that period. To bring back these events to memory, however, does not permit to conceal the part played by the physicians committing of these inhuman Nazi crimes. Data collected from a psychosomatically oriented examination of victims exemplify that to concretely recall gynaecology during Nazism a1-so offers a chance in several respects. One of the possibilities in this context is to signal "late apology" and regret to patients who had been victims, in one's own area of work, after one has psychically worked over their fate. Besides, a gynaecological-psychosomatic expertise will help e.g. that compulsorily sterilised women are granted financial aid that has at long last become a legal possibility and can be applied for since 1980. However, the relevant patient records do show very clearly that the inhuman practice of gynaecology during the so-called "Third Reich" was not only a collective problem but equally due to a failure of the individual conscience of numerous gynaecologists. Working over this complex may enhance our own sensitivity for psychosomatic and ethic problems and counteract any likelihood of a recurrence of an inhuman gynaecology.
- Published
- 1994
- Full Text
- View/download PDF