Search

The first follow-up treatment recommendation from the DGOU's Clinical Tissue Regeneration working group dates back to 2012. New scientific evidence and changed framework conditions made it necessary to update the follow-up treatment recommendations after cartilage therapy.As part of a multi-stage member survey, a consensus was reached which, together with the scientific evidence, provides the basis for the present follow-up treatment recommendation.The decisive criterion for follow-up treatment is still the defect localisation. A distinction is made between femorotibial and patellofemoral defects. In addition, further criteria regarding cartilage defects are now also taken into account (stable cartilage edge, location outside the main stress zone) and the different methods of cartilage therapy (e. g. osteochondral transplantation, minced cartilage) are discussed.The present updated recommendation includes different aspects of follow-up treatment, starting with early perioperative management through to sports clearance and resumption of contact sports after cartilage therapy has taken place., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

The Working Group of the German Orthopedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) on Tissue Regeneration has published recommendations on the indication of different surgical approaches for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint in 2004, 2013 and 2016. Based upon new scientific knowledge and new developments, this recommendation is an update based upon the best clinical evidence available. In addition to prospective randomised controlled clinical trials, this also includes studies with a lower level of evidence. In the absence of evidence, the decision is based on a consensus process within the members of the working group.The principle of making decision dependent on defect size has not been changed in the new recommendation either. The indication for arthroscopic microfracturing has been reduced up to a defect size of 2 cm 2 maximum, while autologous chondrocyte implantation is the method of choice for larger cartilage defects. Additionally, matrix-augmented bone marrow stimulation (mBMS) has been included in the recommendation for defects ranging from 1 to 4.5 cm 2 . For the treatment of smaller osteochondral defects, in addition to osteochondral transplantation (OCT), mBMS is also recommended. For larger defects, matrix-augmented autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI/mACT) in combination with augmentation of the subchondral bone is recommended., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study was aimed to determine the impact of bioregenerative operations in case of degenerative cartilage lesions within the media knee compartment., Material and Methods: The CartilageRegistry DGOU was founded in 2013. At the deadline August 2016 a total of 1847 patients were included. A total of 23.3% (n = 432) was suffering from a degenerative cartilage lesion in the medial compartment. Follow-up was performed after 6, 12, and 24 months (online evaluation). The patients were asked for their subject feeling as well as the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was determined., Results: Most of the patients (n = 358) suffered from a single femoral lesion. In 25 cases single tibial and in 49 cases combined defects ("kissing lesions") were addressed by different treatment options: 39.9% autologous chondrocyte transplantation, in 8.1% in combination with a spongiosa plasty. Other treatments were drilling, microfracturing with or without matrix. In 17.9% the surgeons had chosen combined methods. The bioregenerative treatment was combined with a concomitant operation in 39.7% in patients with medial, in 56.0% in patients with a tibial, and in 67.9% in patients with combined defects. The mostly performed additional operations were osteotomies. There were no gender differences at baseline or during follow-up. The history of patients with femoral defects was shorter than in the other groups. The patients with medial defects judged the subjective outcome significant more frequently better after 6, 12, or 24 months compared with the other groups. The KOOS raised from baseline (median 52 points) to a median of 75 after 6, to 78 points after 12, and to 80 points after 24 months. Patients with femoral defects had a better KOOS-outcome in tendency. Revision operations were required in 7.1%., Conclusions: The treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions (respective early OA) by bioregenerative procedures are well-established measures. These treatments are sufficient to produce high patients' satisfaction and acceptable short/midterm results., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest./Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Surgical principles for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee include bone marrow stimulation techniques (i.e. arthroscopic microfracturing) and transplantation techniques (i.e. autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral transplantation). On the basis of increasing scientific evidence, indications for these established therapeutical concepts have been specified and clear recommendations for practical use have been given. Within recent years, matrix-augmented bone marrow stimulation has been established as a new treatment concept for chondral lesions. To date, scientific evidence is limited and specific indications are still unclear. The present paper gives an overview of available products as well as preclinical and clinical scientific evidence. On the basis of the present evidence and an expert consensus from the "Working Group on Tissue Regeneration" of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU), indications are specified and recommendations for the use of matrix-augmented bone marrow stimulation are given. In principle, it can be stated that the various products offered in this field differ considerably in terms of the number and quality of related studies (evidence level). Against the background of the current data situation, their application is currently seen in the border area between cell transplantation and bone marrow stimulation techniques, but also as an improvement on traditional bone marrow stimulation within the indication range of microfracturing. The recommendations of the Working Group have preliminary character and require re-evaluation after improvement of the study situation., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: In clinical practice, there is still no definite treatment algorithm for focal, partial thickness cartilage lesions (grade II - III). It is well-established that debridement (shaving/lavage) of large degenerative cartilage lesions is not recommended, but there is no such recommendation in the case of focal, partial thickness cartilage defects., Materials and Methods: The scientific rationale of cartilage shaving and joint lavage was investigated and a systematic analysis was performed of the literature on the clinical effect of cartilage debridement. Furthermore, a consensus statement on this issue was developed by the working group on Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)., Results: The therapeutic approach is different for asymptomatic lesions with biomechanical stable residual cartilage tissue and clinically symptomatic defects with unstable fragments. The benefit of a joint lavage or surface smoothening of focal partial thickness has not been proved. Even more importantly, the mechanical or thermal resection of cartilage tissue even induces a zone of necrosis in adjacent cartilage, and thus leads to additional injury. Therefore, large scale smoothening (shaving) of clinically asymptomatic, fibrillated or irregular cartilage defects should not be performed. However, if there are clinical symptoms, resection of unstable and delaminated cartilage fragments may be reasonable, as it can reduce harmful shear tension in residual tissue. This can help to brake the progression of the damage and avoid formation of free bodies., Conclusion: The decision criteria for debridement of partial thickness focal cartilage lesions are multifactorial and include the clinical symptoms, the size and the degree of the defect, the stability of remaining cartilage, localisation of the defect, and individual patient-specific parameters. Debridement is not recommended for asymptomatic lesions, but may be reasonable for symptomatic cases with unstable tissue., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background Symptomatic pre-arthritic deformities such as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or hip dysplasia often lead to localised cartilage defects and subsequently to osteoarthritis. The present review of the working group "Clinical Tissue Regeneration" of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU) and the hip committee of the AGA (German speaking Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery) provides an overview of current knowledge of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of cartilage defects, in order to infer appropriate therapy recommendations for the hip. Methods Review of FAI and resultant cartilage damage in the hip as reported in published study findings in the literature and discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical procedures to preserve the joint. Results Most published studies on the surgical treatment of cartilage damage in the hip report defects caused by cam-type FAI at the acetabulum. Development of these defects can be prevented by timely elimination of the relevant deformities. At present, current full-thickness cartilage defects are mostly treated with bone marrow-stimulating techniques such as microfracture (MFx), with or without a biomaterial, and matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). Osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) is not the treatment of choice for isolated full-thickness chondral defects at the hip, because of the unfavourable risk-benefit profile. Due to the relatively short history of cartilage repair surgery on the hip, the studies available on these procedures have low levels of evidence. However, it is already becoming obvious that the experience gained with the same procedures on the knee can be applied to the hip as well. For example, limited healing and regeneration of chondral defects after MFx can also be observed at the hip joint. Conclusions The cartilage surface of the acetabulum, where FAI-related chondral lesions appear, is considerably smaller than the weight-bearing cartilage surface of the knee joint. However, as in the knee joint, MACT is the therapy of choice for full-thickness cartilage defects of more than 1.5 - 2 cm 2 . Minimally invasive types of MACT (e.g. injectable chondrocyte implants) should be preferred in the hip joint. In cases where a single-stage procedure is indicated or there are other compelling reasons for not performing a MACT, a bone marrow-stimulating technique in combination with a biomaterial covering is preferable to standard MFx. For treatment of lesions smaller than 1.5 - 2 cm 2 the indication for a single-stage procedure is wider. As with defects in the knee, it is not possible to determine a definite upper age limit for joint-preserving surgery or MACT in the hip, as the chronological age of patients does not necessarily correlate with their biological age or the condition of their joints. Advanced osteoarthritis of the hip is a contraindication for any kind of hip-preserving surgery. Long-term observations and prospective randomised studies like those carried out for other joints are necessary., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) has been introduced in October 2013 and aims on the evaluation of patients who underwent cartilage repair for symptomatic cartilage defects. It represents a nation-wide cohort study which has been introduced by the working group "Tissue Regeneration" of the Germany Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology and is technically based upon a web-based remote data entry (RDE) system. The present article describes first experiences with the registry including patient and treatment characteristics. Between October 2013 and April 2014, a total of 230 patients who had undergone surgical cartilage repair for symptomatic full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee has been included in the German Cartilage Registry from 23 cartilage repair centres. Mean age was 37.11 years (SD 13.61) and mean defect size was 3.68 cm(2) (SD 0.23). Since the introduction of the KnorpelRegister DGOU the total number of registered patients has increased steadily up to the most recent figure of 72 patients within one month. Patients were treated mainly according to the recommended therapies. The highest percentage in therapy is represented by the bone marrow stimulation techniques (55.02 %) as well as by the autologous chondrocyte transplantation (34.92 %). Unlike the patient collective in the majority of prospective randomised controlled trials, the patient population within the registry shows a high proportion of patients with accompanying pathologies, with an age of more than 50 years at the time of treatment and with unfavourably assessed accompanying pathologies such as an affection of the opposite cartilage surface or a previously resected meniscus. In summary, the technical platform and forms of documentation of the KnorpelRegister DGOU have proved to be very promising within the first six months. Unlike data from other clinical trials, the previous analysis of the patients' data and therapies reflects successfully the actual medical care situation of patients with cartilage defects of the knee joint. This analysis also provides new information on subgroups of patients that have not yet been recorded in the scientific literature. This will be part of the first analysis of clinical treatment data. An expansion of the KnorpelRegister DGOU to patients with cartilage defects of the ankle and hip joints is already decided upon and initialised., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (ACT/ACI) is an established and recognised procedure for the treatment of localised full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee. The present review of the working group "Clinical Tissue Regeneration" of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU) describes the biology and function of healthy articular cartilage, the present state of knowledge concerning potential consequences of primary cartilage lesions and the suitable indication for ACI. Based on current evidence, an indication for ACI is given for symptomatic cartilage defects starting from defect sizes of more than 3-4 cm2; in the case of young and active sports patients at 2.5 cm2. Advanced degenerative joint disease is the single most important contraindication. The review gives a concise overview on important scientific background, the results of clinical studies and discusses advantages and disadvantages of ACI., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)