Search

Objective: To evaluate clinicopathological features of patients with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤3 ng/mL and diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: A total of 34 male patients diagnosed with PCa by either prostate needle biopsy (PNB) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) were included in this study between January 2010 and June 2021. Patients whose preoperative serum PSA level was >3 ng/mL and those with missing clinical data were excluded. Preoperative clinical characteristics of the patients and pathological findings of PNB, TUR-P, and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens were evaluated. Results: The median age of the patients was 65 (60-69) years. The median preoperative serum PSA level was 1.98 (1.45-2.64) ng/mL. PCa was detected by "systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) only", combined prostate biopsy [SBx following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy (TBx)], and "TUR-P" in 6 (17.6%), 17 (50.0%), and 11 (32.4%) patients, respectively. In combination of both biopsy, PCa was detected in "SBx specimens only", "TBx specimens only", and "both TBx and SBx specimens" in 3 (8.8%), 5 (14.7%), and 9 (26.5%) patients, respectively. Clinically significant (cs) PCa was in 52.9% of the TBx (9/17) and 60.9% of the SBx (14/23) specimen. Twenty (58.8%) patients treated with RP. csPCa in RP specimens was observed in 17/20 (85.0%) patients. Upgrading in RP specimens compared with PNB specimens was observed in 5/11 (45.5%) of the TBx and 9/17 (52.9%) of the SBx specimen. At the final RP pathology, International Society of Urologic Pathology-grade group >3 or non-organ confined disease were observed in 8 (40%) and 8 (40.0%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: Adverse pathological outcomes in RP specimens are frequent in patients with PCa with a serum PSA level of ≤3 ng/mL at the time of diagnosis, and physicians should be aware of the limitations of pre-set PSA cut-off levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Intensive Care is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: The reliability and reproducibility of T2-weighted imaging/ fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2/FLAIR) mismatch were investigated in the diagnosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant astrocytoma between WHO grade II and III diffuse hemispheric gliomas.Methods: WHO grade II and grade III diffuse hemispheric gliomas (n=133) treated in our institute were included in the study. Pathological findings and molecular markers of the cases were reviewed with the criteria of WHO 2016. The finding of mismatch between T2-weighted and FLAIR images in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cases was evaluated by two different radiologists. The readers reviewed MRIs independently, blinded to the histopathologic diagnosis or molecular subset of tumors. The cases were classified as IDH-mutant astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and IDH-wildtype (IDH-wt) astrocytoma according to molecular and genetic features.Results: T2/FLAIR mismatch positivity was observed in 46 patients (34.6%). T2/FLAIR mismatch positivity was observed in 42 of 75 IDH-mutant astrocytomas (56%) and 4 of 43 oligodendrogliomas (9.30%), while it was not seen among IDH-wt astrocytomas (0/15, 0%). The T2/FLAIR mismatch ratio was significantly different between IDH-mutant astrocytomas (WHO grade II and grade III) and oligodendrogliomas (chi-square, p <0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of T2/FLAIR mismatch in predicting IDH-mutant astrocytomas were 58.7%, 90.7%, 91.7%, 61.4%, and 70.3% respectively. Radiologist 1 diagnosed T2/FLAIR mismatch in 48 of 133 cases (36.1%) and Radiologist 2 in 66 of 133 cases (49.6%). The interrater agreement for the T2/FLAIR mismatch sign was 0.61 (p <0.05), 95% CI (0.55, 0.67).Conclusion: T2/FLAIR mismatch appears to be an important MRI finding in distinguishing IDH-mutant astrocytomas from other diffuse hemispheric gliomas. However, it should be kept in mind that T2/FLAIR mismatch sign can be seen in a minority of oligodendrogliomas besides IDH-mutant astrocytomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Academic Research in Medicine is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a list of individuals to be honored with the journals Editor's Recognition Awards including Bahri Üstünsöz, Uğur Bozlar, and Gonca Eldem along with a list for people with a special distinction in reviewing for the year 2015 including Elena Belloni and Devrim Akinci.