Search

A 51-year-old female with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (CCTGA), situs solitus, dextrocardia, atrial septal defect and persistent left superior vena cava underwent electrophysiology study for recurrent palpitations with documented narrow complex, short RP tachycardia. With a catheter in the region of the anterior mitral annulus, a His signal was recorded and HV interval was 35 msec. Tachycardia was induced with a ventricular extrastimulus. During the tachycardia there was 1:1 ventriculo-atrial conduction and central atrial activation with a VA interval of 20 msec. The recorded His signal could be seen after the QRS. What is the mechanism of the tachycardia?, (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Apart from junctional rhythms during slow pathway ablation, there is limited knowledge about the junctional tachycardia persisting following ablation cessation. This study is conducted to determine the characteristics and significance of this rare arrhythmia., Methods and Results: This study was done on 487 patients with AVNRT undergoing the radiofrequency ablation. The RF delivery-induced Supraventricular Tachycardia, persisting for a few minutes following the termination of ablation (post-ablation SVT) was investigated in this research. Atrial Overdrive Pacing (AOP) was applied to the post-ablation SVT to distinguish AVNRT from Junctional Tachycardia(JT). A total of 2337 RF-current deliveries were applied, and post-ablation SVT was observed in 81 of them. According to the electrophysiological studies, five of them (in five separate cases) were definitely diagnosed as JT. The overall incidence of post-ablation JT was about 1% of all patients. In these cases, RF energy was applied to the posteroseptal region and roof of the proximal coronary sinus. The mean Cycle Length (CL) of JTs was equal to 446 ±67ms. Following post- ablation JT termination, four cases met endpoints of successful ablation, demonstrating a positive predictive value of 80%. Atrioventricular (AV) block did not occur in any of the cases and reappearance of JT was not observed during procedure or mean follow-up period of 19.8 ± 8.4 months., Conclusions: Post-ablation JT is probably a transient Ischemia-induced arrhythmia that does not require further ablation. Thus, it is recommended to differentiate between the AVNRT and JT in post-ablation arrhythmias to avoid unnecessary RF application., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The classical form of typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a "slow-fast" pathways tachycardia, and the usual therapy is an ablation of the slow pathway since it carries a low risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. In patients with long PR interval and/or living on the anterograde slow pathway, an alternative technique is required. We report a case of a 42-year-old lady with idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy, persistent atrial fibrillation status post pulmonary vein isolation, and premature ventricular complex ablation with a systolic dysfunction, who presented with incessant slow narrow complex tachycardia of 110 bpm that appeared to be an AVNRT. Her baseline EKG revealed a first-degree AV block with a PR of 320 ms. EP study showed no evidence of anterograde fast pathway conduction. Given this fact, the decision was to attempt an ablation of the retrograde fast pathway. The fast pathway was mapped during tachycardia to its usual location into the anteroseptal region, then radiofrequency ablation in this location terminated tachycardia. After ablation, she continued to have her usual anterograde conduction through slow pathway and the tachycardia became uninducible. In special populations with prolonged PR interval or poor anterograde fast pathway conduction, fast pathway ablation is the required ablation for typical AVNRT., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The atrioventricular (AV) node generates half of the AV delay needed for blood pumping and filters atrial impulses that could otherwise induce life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. It is also a pacemaker and a key target in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. The special roles of the AV node primarily arise from its slow conduction, long refractory period, and cellular automaticity. However, efforts to establish the dynamics of these properties and their interaction led to many controversies. In fact, the AV node's behavior is so complex that it seems to escape broadly applicable rules. This review summarizes progresses made in resolving these issues and in integrating the multiple roles of the AV node within a common functional model. Presented evidence shows that the rate-dependent conduction and refractory properties of the AV node can be reliably characterized and reconciled from nodal responses to S 1 S 2 S 3 protocols. It also supports the concept that dual pathways constitute a feature of the normal AV node and account for its overall conduction and refractory properties. In this model, the posterior extension and compact node provide the core of the slow and fast pathway, respectively. The transitional tissues and lower nodal bundle provide a common proximal and distal pathway, respectively. These pathways would also support bidirectional conduction. The dual pathway involvement can also be extended to widely variable AV nodal responses, such as Wenckebach cycles, hysteresis, and ventricular response to atrial fibrillation. In brief, the intricate AV nodal behavior may obey a limited set of accessible and definable rules., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a common tachyarrhythmia substrate in children, which is successfully treated by catheter ablation using radiofrequency or cryothermal energy. In recent years, cryoablation (Cryo) using electroanatomical system guidance is more commonly preferred for use in children in order to decrease the risk of an atrioventricular block. However, there are concerns regarding the long-term efficacy of Cryo in treating AVNRT. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of Cryo for AVNRT in children., Methods and Results: A total of 275 consecutive children above 4 years of age diagnosed with AVNRT were included in our study. The EnSite system (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) was used to reduce or eliminate fluoroscopy. The study included 275 patients (148 females, age: 11.9 ± 3.6 years) undergoing catheter ablation for AVNRT from July 2012 to September 2016. Acute success was obtained in all (100%) patients with a mean procedure time of 140 ± 44 minutes. Fluoroscopy was used in only 12 (4.4%) patients. During a follow-up time of 25.6 ± 13.5 months (median: 23 months), AVNRT recurred in 12 of 279 (4.4%) of the patients. Age, sex, number of Cryo lesions, and catheter tip size (6-mm vs 8-mm) were not predictive for recurrence. In nine patients, a repeat ablation was successfully performed with cryoenergy., Conclusions: Cryo for AVNRT is a safe and effective procedure with excellent long-term outcomes. The use of electroanatomical systems during ablation significantly decreases exposure to fluoroscopy without compromising success., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Ablation is an effective treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The occurrence of junctional ectopic rhythm (JER), including junctional ectopic tachycardia, following AVNRT ablation has been described as an extremely rare phenomenon, but may be underestimated. We aimed to determine the incidence of JER following AVNRT ablation within our institution, as well as that reported in the literature via an extensive review., Methods: We reviewed our adult ablation institutional experience for the occurrence of JER after AVNRT ablation from 2009 to 2016. Additionally, we conducted an extensive literature search using different databases looking for AVNRT ablation case series. The individually reported complications of these studies were reviewed, with a primary endpoint defined as the occurrence of JER shortly after AVNRT ablation. The study was approved by our institutional review board., Results: Our institutional data revealed 6/126 patients (prevalence 4.8%) developed non-preexisting JER post-AVNRT ablation. Four patients were asymptomatic. Two patients had persistent symptoms lasting over a year, with one patient requiring repeat ablation. The literature review included 149 adult and pediatric studies. There were three cases of reported JER, out of a total of 37,541 patients (31,768 adults and 5,773 pediatric; prevalence 0.008%). The three JER patients were pediatric, and all required further therapeutic intervention., Conclusion: JER might be an underreported complication of AVNRT ablation. It seems most often to be transient and self-limited, occurring days to weeks after ablation, but may also be debilitating, requiring more aggressive management., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

"2 for 1 phenomenon" is simultaneous anterograde conduction over the fast and slow pathways of the atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway, leading to a double ventricular response from each atrial beat. This phenomenon can initiate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The unique induction of AVNRT was observed in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in our case. Minimal to no retrograde invasion of the slow pathway from the anterogradely conducted fast pathway depolarization is the most accepted explanation., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: There are limited adult data suggesting the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) of atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) is shorter than atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), though little data exist in children. We sought to determine if there is a difference in TCL between AVRT and AVNRT in children., Methods: A single-center retrospective review of children with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from 2000 to 2015 was performed., Inclusion Criteria: Age ≤ 18 years, invasive electrophysiology study (EPS) confirming AVRT or AVNRT., Exclusion Criteria: Atypical AVNRT, congenital heart disease, antiarrhythmic medication use at time of EPS. Data were compared between patients with AVRT and AVNRT via t-test, χ 2 test, and linear regression., Results: A total of 835 patients were included (12 ± 4 years, 52 ± 31 kg, TCL 321 ± 55 ms), 539 (65%) with AVRT (270 Wolff-Parkinson-White, 269 concealed pathways) and 296 (35%) with AVNRT. Patients with AVRT were younger (11.7 ± 4.1 years vs 13.0 ± 3.6 years, P < 0.001) and smaller (49 ± 22 kg vs 57 ± 43 kg, P < 0.001). In the baseline state, the TCL was shorter in AVRT than AVRNT (329 ± 51 ms vs 340 ± 60 ms, P = 0.04). In patients requiring isoproterenol to induce SVT, there was no difference in TCL (290 ± 49 ms vs 297 ± 49 ms, P = 0.26). When controlling for age, there was no difference in TCL between AVRT and AVNRT at baseline or on isoproterenol. The regression equation for TCL in the baseline state was TCL = 290 + 4 (age), indicating the TCL will increase by 4 ms above a baseline of 290 ms for each year of life., Conclusions: When controlling for age, there is no difference in the TCL between AVRT and AVNRT in children. Age, not tachycardia mechanism, is the most significant factor in predicting TCL., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Mapping of the antegrade fast pathway (A-FP) exact sites and antegrade slow pathway (A-SP) input locations has not been well described., Methods: In 56 patients with slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (SF-AVNRT), pacing during sinus rhythm and entrainment pacing during SF-AVNRT were performed at various sites in the triangle of Koch and coronary sinus (CS) to identify the A-FP and A-SP inputs. User-defined three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping of the stimulus-His potential (St-H) interval and anatomical location was performed. The A-FP input was defined as the site of the shortest St-H interval, and A-SP input as the site of the shortest St-H interval and with a postpacing-interval equal to the tachycardia cycle length. The locations of the A-FP and A-SP inputs were mapped as a ratio of the distance between the His bundle (HB) and CS orifice (CSO), and the HB-CSO axis was divided into three zones: superior-, mid-, and inferior septum. The distance between the A-SP and A-FP inputs was calculated using the distance from each input to the HB and HB-CSO axis., Results: Only 30 patients were included in this study because the A-SP mapping failed in 26. The A-SP input was distributed to the superior septum in four, mid- or inferior septum in 25, and CS in one. An A-SP input which was located less than 10 mm from the A-FP input was observed in one of four patients with a superior septum A-SP., Conclusions: An A-SP input at the superior septum seemed to be a potential risk for atrioventricular nodal injury during ablation., (©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Anatomical considerations and risks related to x-ray exposure make atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation in pediatric patients a concerning procedure. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of performing fluoroless slow-pathway cryoablation guided by the electroanatomic (EA) mapping in children and adolescents., Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients (mean age 13.5 ± 2.4 years) symptomatic for AVNRT were prospectively enrolled to right atrium EA mapping and electrophysiological study prior to cryoablation. Cryoablation was guided by slow-pathway potential and performed using a 4-mm-tip catheter., Results: Sustained slow-fast AVNRT was inducible in all the patients with a dual AV nodal physiology in 95%. Acute success was achieved in 100% of the patients with a median of two cryo-applications. Fluoroless ablation was feasible in 19 patients, while in two subjects 50 seconds and 45 seconds of x-ray were needed due to difficult progression of the catheters along the venous system. After a mean follow-up of 25 months, AVNRT recurred in five patients. All the recurrences were successfully treated with a second procedure. In three patients, a fluoroless cryoablation with a 6-mm-tip catheter was successfully performed, while in the remaining two patients, a single pulse of 60 seconds of radiofrequency energy was applied under fluoroscopic monitoring. No complications occurred., Conclusions: Combination of EA mapping systems and cryoablation may allow to perform fluoroless slow-pathway ablation for AVNRT in children and adolescents in the majority of patients. Fluoroless slow-pathway cryoablation showed a high efficacy and safety comparable to conventional fluoroscopy guided procedures., (©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)