Search

There is a rather generalized belief that the worst possible outcome for the application of immunological therapies against cancer is a null effect on tumor growth. However, a significant body of evidence summarized in the immunostimulatory hypothesis of cancer suggests that, upon certain circumstances, the growth of incipient and established tumors can be accelerated rather than inhibited by the immune response supposedly mounted to limit tumor growth. In order to provide more compelling evidence of this proposition, we have explored the growth behavior characteristics of twelve murine tumors -most of them of spontaneous origin- arisen in the colony of our laboratory, in putatively immunized and control mice. Using classical immunization procedures, 8 out of 12 tumors were actually stimulated in "immunized" mice while the remaining 4 were neither inhibited nor stimulated. Further, even these apparently non-antigenic tumors could reveal some antigenicity if more stringent than classical immunization procedures were used. This possibility was suggested by the results obtained with one of these four apparently non-antigenic tumors: the LB lymphoma. In effect, upon these stringent immunization pretreatments, LB was slightly inhibited or stimulated, depending on the titer of the immune reaction mounted against the tumor, with higher titers rendering inhibition and lower titers rendering tumor stimulation. All the above results are consistent with the immunostimulatory hypothesis that entails the important therapeutic implications -contrary to the orthodoxy- that, anti-tumor vaccines may run a real risk of doing harm if the vaccine-induced immunity is too weak to move the reaction into the inhibitory part of the immune response curve and that, a slight and prolonged immunodepression -rather than an immunostimulation- might interfere with the progression of some tumors and thus be an aid to cytotoxic therapies.

Up to date, most attempts to use immunotherapy to cause the regression of animal and human established tumors have not been successful. Former experiments have postulated that this failure could be attributed, at least in part, to a lack of immunogenicity of spontaneous tumors. In this paper, we have investigated whether this lack of immunogenicity can be attributed to the absence of tumor antigens or to the existence of tolerogenic mechanisms preventing such antigens from initiating an antitumor immune response. We have used two murine tumors a non-immunogenic spontaneous lymphoma (LB) and a strongly immunogenic methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma (MC-C) together with a vaccination strategy based on the inoculation of dendritic cells (DC) loaded with a tumor lysate. When DC were pulsed with LB lysate (DC+LB), no maturation of DC was achieved in vitro and no protection against LB implants after DC+LB inoculation was observed in vivo. On the other hand, when DC were pulsed with MC-C lysate (DC+MC-C), maturation of DC was observed along with a strong protection against MC-C implants after DC+MC-C inoculaton. Finally, when DC were pulsed with both LB and MC-C lysates (DC+LB+MC-C), maturation of DC and protection against LB implants were achieved. Since no immune cross reaction between MC-C and LB was ever observed, the most likely interpretation is that LB bears specific tumor antigens but lacks other signals to achieve DC maturation. These signals would be provided by MC-C which would enable DC to mature and to initiate an effective anti-LB immune response.

The link between cancer and inflammation in an organ or tissue has firmly been established on the basis that cancer tends to occur at sites of chronic inflammation and that local inflammatory processes can accelerate the growth of preexisting tumors in both animals and human beings. In contrast, the relationship between cancer and systemic inflammation has been less studied. In this work, we demonstrated that the growth of the murine fibrosarcoma MC-C, was accompanied by manifestations of systemic inflammation, as demonstrated by an increase in both the number of circulating polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and the serum concentration of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and the acute phase proteins C reactive (CRP) and serum A amyloid (SAA). Two temporally separate peaks of systemic inflammation were detected during tumor development. The first was displayed during the first week after tumor inoculation. The second peak began around day 14 and its intensity was proportional to tumor size. In mice bearing a large MC-C tumor, a high number of circulating PMN and myeloid precursors were evident. Most of these cells exhibited activation evidenced by an increased reactive oxygen species generation and high expression of the Gr1+/Mac1+ markers. Inoculation of thioglycolate -which generates a transient systemic inflammation-accelerated the growth of MC-C tumor and reciprocally, inhibition of such systemic inflammation by using indomethacin, prevented that enhancing effect. This suggests that the systemic inflammation that the tumor generates on its own, could be part of its growth strategy.

Although animals can be prophylactically immunized against the growth of tumor implants, most of the attempts to use immunotherapy to cause the regression of animal and human tumors once they become established have been unsuccessful. To understand the nature of this refractoriness we have studied a methylcholanthrene-induced and strongly immunogenic murine fibrosarcoma. In our model, the onset of this refractoriness was associated with the beginning of an immunosuppressive state known as "immunological eclipse" characterized by a loss of the antitumor immune response when tumor grows beyond a critical size. This immunological eclipse was accompanied by the emergence of a systemic inflammatory condition. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with a single dose of a synthetic corticosteroid, dexamethasone (DX), reduced significantly all parameters of systemic inflammation and simultaneously reversed the immunological eclipse. The reversion of the eclipse upon DX treatment was not curative itself, but allowed an immunological therapy based in dendritic cells pulsed with tumor antigens, which was itself absolutely ineffective, to exert a significant inhibitory effect against an established growing tumor. The two-step schedule using an anti-inflammatory treatment to reverse the immunological eclipse plus a dendritic cell-based vaccination strategy aimed to stimulate the antitumor immune response, could serve eventually as a model of immunotherapy against animal and human tumors.