Search

Introduction: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) significantly impacts women's quality of life and often shows a high recurrence rate despite conventional antifungal therapies. This study evaluates the efficacy of Limosilactobacillus fermentum (LF5), a probiotic, as an alternative treatment option to conventional miconazole therapy in managing VVC., Methods: The randomized, single-blind clinical trial involved 100 premenopausal women diagnosed with VVC. Participants were assigned to either a vaginal capsule containing LF5 probiotic strain or miconazole. Treatments were administered once daily for three consecutive days. Microbiological eradication of Candida spp. and recurrence rates were assessed at 30 days post-treatment. The trial was registered with the Italian Ministry of Health., Results: Both treatments achieved a high rate of microbiological eradication of Candida spp. within the three-day treatment period (96% for LF5 and 94% for miconazole). Recurrence rates within 2 weeks post-treatment were low and similar between the groups (10% for LF5 and 17% for miconazole). LF5 was found to have a significantly lower incidence of local adverse reactions compared to miconazole (4 vs. 12%)., Discussion: LF5 presents a viable alternative to miconazole for the treatment of VVC, offering comparable efficacy with fewer side effects. The results suggest that probiotic treatments can potentially enhance patient compliance and quality of life by reducing adverse reactions and recurrence rates. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger and more diverse populations., Competing Interests: MP is employed by the Probiotical Research Srl. EC is an independent consultant to Probiotical Research Srl., (Copyright © 2024 Pane and Chisari.)

Isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) is a potent analytical method for the real-time assessment of microbial metabolic activity, which serves as an indicator of microbial viability. This approach is highly relevant to the fields of probiotics and Live Biotherapeutic Products (LBPs), offering insights into microbial viability and growth kinetics. One important characteristic of IMC is its ability to measure microbial metabolic activity separately from cellular enumeration. This is particularly useful in situations where continuous tracking of bacterial activity is challenging. The focus on metabolic activity significantly benefits both probiotic research and industrial microbiology applications. IMC's versatility in handling different media matrices allows for the implementation of viability assessments under conditions that mirror those found in various industrial environments or biological models. In our study, we provide a proof of concept for the application of IMC in determining viability and growth dynamics and their correlation with bacterial count in probiotic organisms. Our findings reinforce the potential of IMC as a key method for process enhancement and accurate strain characterization within the probiotic sector. This supports the broader objective of refining the systematic approach and methods used during the development process, thereby providing detailed insights into probiotics and LBPs., Competing Interests: CM, SA, and MP were employed by Probiotical Research s.r.l. MS, MV, KK, and KB were employed by Symcel AB., (Copyright © 2024 Morazzoni, Sirel, Allesina, Veses Garcia, Kragh, Pane and Beilharz.)

Application of beneficial microorganisms as probiotics targets a broad range of intended uses, from maintaining health and supporting normal bodily functions to curing and preventing diseases. Currently, three main regulatory fields of probiotic products can be defined depending on their intended use: the more similar probiotic foods and probiotic dietary supplements, and live biotherapeutic products. However, it is not always straightforward to classify a probiotic product into one of these categories. The regulatory nuances of developing, manufacturing, investigating and applying each category of probiotic products are not universal, and not always apparent to those unfamiliar with the various global probiotic regulatory guidelines. Various global markets can be significantly different regarding legislation, possible claims, market value and quality requirements for the development and commercialization of probiotic products. Furthermore, different probiotic product categories are also linked with variable costs at different stages of product development. This review outlines the current landscape comparing probiotic foods, probiotic dietary supplements, and live biotherapeutics as probiotic products from a regulatory lens, focusing on product development, manufacturing and production, and clinical research agenda. The aim is to inform and promote a better understanding among stakeholders by outlining the expectations and performance for each probiotic product category, depending on their intended use and targeted geographical region., Competing Interests: SB and SH were employed by Lallemand Health Solutions. JH was employed by the International Probiotics Association. SL-R was employed by Lesaffre. JD was employed by Fonterra. JE-M was employed by AB-Biotics SA (Kaneka Group). MP was employed by Probiotical Research. AO was employed by IFF Health. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Spacova, Binda, ter Haar, Henoud, Legrain-Raspaud, Dekker, Espadaler-Mazo, Langella, Martín, Pane and Ouwehand.)

Probiotics are the largest non-herbal/traditional dietary supplements category worldwide. To be effective, a probiotic strain must be delivered viable at an adequate dose proven to deliver a health benefit. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the various technologies available for probiotic enumeration, including a general description of each technology, their advantages and limitations, and their potential for the future of the probiotics industry. The current "gold standard" for analytical quantification of probiotics in the probiotic industry is the Plate Count method (PC). PC measures the bacterial cell's ability to proliferate into detectable colonies, thus PC relies on cultivability as a measure of viability. Although viability has widely been measured by cultivability, there has been agreement that the definition of viability is not limited to cultivability. For example, bacterial cells may exist in a state known as viable but not culturable (VBNC) where the cells lose cultivability but can maintain some of the characteristics of viable cells as well as probiotic properties. This led to questioning the association between viability and cultivability and the accuracy of PC in enumerating all the viable cells in probiotic products. PC has always been an estimate of the number of viable cells and not a true cell count. Additionally, newer probiotic categories such as Next Generation Probiotics (NGPs) are difficult to culture in routine laboratories as NGPs are often strict anaerobes with extreme sensitivity to atmospheric oxygen. Thus, accurate quantification using culture-based techniques will be complicated. Another emerging category of biotics is postbiotics, which are inanimate microorganisms, also often referred to as tyndallized or heat-killed bacteria. Obviously, culture dependent methods are not suitable for these products, and alternative methods are needed for their quantification. Different methodologies provide a more complete picture of a heterogeneous bacterial population versus PC focusing exclusively on the eventual multiplication of the cells. Alternative culture-independent techniques including real-time PCR, digital PCR and flow cytometry are discussed. These methods can measure viability beyond cultivability (i.e., by measuring cellular enzymatic activity, membrane integrity or membrane potential), and depending on how they are designed they can achieve strain-specific enumeration., Competing Interests: M-EB is the president of Nutrapharma Consulting Services and was involved with external laboratories as a consultant. AB was employed by Eurofins USA. MP was employed by Probiotical Research s.r.l. HS was employed by Purity-IQ Inc., (Copyright © 2023 Boyte, Benkowski, Pane and Shehata.)

Introduction: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability. Colony forming units is the de facto gold standard for enumerating viable in probiotic products. The notion of microbial viability has been anchored in the concept of cultivability, which refers to a cell's capacity to replicate and form colonies on agar media. However, there is a growing consensus that the term "viability" should not be exclusively tied to the ability to cultivate cells. For example, bacterial cells can exist in a Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) state, characterized by the maintenance of characteristics such as membrane integrity, enzymatic activity, pH gradients, and elevated levels of rRNA, despite losing the ability to form colonies., Methods: Herein we present the results of a collaborative inter-laboratory ring test for cytometric bacterial quantification. Specifically, membrane integrity fluorescence flow cytometry (FFC) method and the newer impedance flow cytometry (IFC) method have been used. Both methods interrogate single cells in solution for the presence of intact membranes. FFC exploits fluorochromes that reflect the presence or absence of an intact membrane. IFC probes membrane integrity in a label-free approach by detecting membrane-induced hindrances to the propagation of electricity., Results: A performance ring-test and comparison design on the FFC method showed that the method is robust against the exchange of equipment, procedures, materials, and operators. After initial method optimization with assessments of rehydration medium, wake-up duration, and phase shift gating on the individual strains, the IFC method showed good agreement with the FFC results. Specifically, we tested 6 distinct species of probiotic bacteria (3 Lactobacillus and 3 Bifidobacterium strains) finding good agreement between FFC and IFC results in terms of total and live cells., Discussion: Together, these results demonstrate that flow cytometry is a reliable, precise, and user-friendly culture-independent method for bacterial enumeration., Competing Interests: PJ and MD were employed by SBT Instruments A/S. MP, CM, SA, and DZ were employed by Probiotical Research. DC, SG, and EG were employed by AAT – Advanced Analytical Technologies, Fiorenzuola d’Arda. J-PW was employed by European Scientific League for Probiotics., (Copyright © 2023 Jordal, Diaz, Morazzoni, Allesina, Zogno, Cattivelli, Galletti, Guidesi, Warzée and Pane.)

Probiotic bacteria, capable of conferring benefits to the host, can present challenges in design, development, scale-up, manufacturing, commercialization, and life cycle management. Strain identification is one of the main quality parameters; nevertheless, this task can be challenging since established methodologies can lack resolution at the strain level for some microorganisms and\or are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIRS) has been largely used for the investigation of pathogenic species in the clinical field, whereas only recently has been proposed for the identification of probiotic strains. Within the probiotic industrial production, bacterial strains can be subjected to stressful conditions that may affect genomic and phenotypic characteristics; therefore, real-time monitoring of all the sequential growth steps is requested. Considering the fast, low-cost, and high-throughput features, FTIRS is an innovative and functional technology for typing probiotic strains from bench-top experiments to large-scale industrial production, allowing the monitoring of stability and identity of probiotic strains. In this study, the discriminatory power of FTIRS was assessed for four Lactiplantibacillus plantarum probiotic strains grown under different conditions, including temperatures (30 and 37°C) and medium (broth and agar), after consecutive sub-culturing steps. A comparison between the generated spectra with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles was also performed. FTIRS was not only able to distinguish the strains of L. plantarum under different growth conditions but also to prove the phenotypic stability of L. plantarum type strain LP-CT after six growing steps. Regardless of the growth conditions, FTIRS spectra related to LP-CT constituted a unique hierarchical cluster, separated from the other L. plantarum strains. These results were confirmed by a PFGE analysis. In addition, based on FTIRS data, broth cultures demonstrated a higher reproducibility and discriminatory power with respect to agar ones. These results support the introduction of FTIRS in the probiotic industry, allowing for the step-by-step monitoring of massive microbial production while also guaranteeing the stability and purity of the probiotic strain. The proposed novel approach can constitute an impressive improvement in the probiotic manufacturing process., Competing Interests: MP, FD, and TG were employees of Probiotical Research S.r.L, Novara (Italy). MC was employee of Bruker Daltonics, Bremen (Germany). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Deidda, Cordovana, Bozzi Cionci, Graziano, Di Gioia and Pane.)

The number of live bacterial cells is the most used parameter to assess the quality of finished probiotic products. Plate counting (PC) is the standard method in industry to enumerate cells. Application of PC implies critical aspects related to the selection of optimal nutrient media and growth conditions and underestimation of viable but not cultivable (VBNC) cells. Flow-cytometry (FC) is a culture-independent methodology having the potential to selectively enumerate live, damaged, and dead cells representing a powerful tool for in-depth monitoring of probiotic products. We monitored the shelf life of a clinical batch of a synbiotic composition PDS-08 targeting the pediatric population by means of PC and FC according to International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) pharma guidelines testing the Arrhenius model as predictive tool; PC enumeration revealed higher destruction rate than FC suggesting a faster reduction in cultivability than membrane integrity and thus a possible shift of the bacteria into a VBNC status. PDS-08 maintained acidification capability over time, when re-suspended in nutrient medium, even in samples tested sub-optimally for CFU detection (below 1 billion cells/dose). Due to similar kinetics described by the study of metabolic activity and membrane integrity, FC might be suggested as a valid tool for the study of functional stability of a probiotic product., Competing Interests: AV, SA, AA, ADP and MP are employees of Probiotical Research s.r.l. RD is co-founder and co-CEO of Seed Health and PB is employee of Seed Health., (Copyright © 2022 Visciglia, Allesina, Amoruso, De Prisco, Dhir, Bron and Pane.)

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, a technology traditionally used in chemistry to determine the molecular composition of a wide range of sample types, has gained growing interest in microbial typing. It is based on the different vibrational modes of the covalent bonds between atoms of a given sample, as bacterial cells, induced by the absorption of infrared radiation. This technique has been largely used for the study of pathogenic species, especially in the clinical field, and has been proposed also for the typing at different subspecies levels. The high throughput, speed, low cost, and simplicity make FTIR spectroscopy an attractive technique also for industrial applications, in particular, for probiotics. The aim of this study was to compare FTIR spectroscopy with established genotyping methods, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), in order to highlight the FTIR spectroscopy potential discriminatory power at strain level. Our study focused on bifidobacteria, an important group of intestinal commensals generally recognized as probiotics. For their properties in promoting and maintaining health, bifidobacteria are largely marketed by the pharmaceutical, food, and dairy industries. Strains belonging to Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis were taken into consideration together with some additional type strains. For B. longum subsp. longum , it was possible to discriminate the strains with all the methods used. Although two isolates were shown to be strictly phylogenetically related, constituting a unique cluster, based on PFGE, WGS, and MLST, no clustering was observed with FTIR. For B. animalis subsp. lactis group, PFGE, WGS, and MLST were non-discriminatory, and only one strain was easily distinguished. On the other hand, FTIR discriminated all the isolates one by one, and no clustering was observed. According to these results, FTIR analysis is not only equivalent to PFGE, WGS, and MLST, but also for some strains, in particular, for B. animalis subsp. lactis group, more informative, being able to differentiate strains not discernible with the other two methods based on phenotypic variations likely deriving from certain genetic changes. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy has highlighted the possibility of using the cell surface as a kind of barcode making tracing strains possible, representing an important aspect in probiotic applications. Furthermore, this work constitutes the first investigation on bifidobacterial strain typing using FTIR spectroscopy., Competing Interests: MP and FD are employees of Probiotical Research S.r.L., Novara, Italy. MC is employee of Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany. FF and IC are employees of Microbion S.r.L., San Giovanni Lupatoto, Verona, Italy. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Deidda, Bozzi Cionci, Cordovana, Campedelli, Fracchetti, Di Gioia, Ambretti and Pane.)

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedures, yielding results in colony-forming units (CFU). One drawback to plating-based procedures is high variability due to intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainties. These uncertainties make comparison between analytical procedures challenging. In this article, we provide tools to reduce measurement uncertainty and strengthen the reliability of probiotic enumerations by using analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM). APLM is a tool that uses a step-by-step process to define procedure performance based on the concept that the reportable value (final CFU result) must be fit for its intended use. Once the procedure performance is defined, the information gathered through APLM can be used to evaluate and compare procedures. Here, we discuss the theory behind applying APLM and give practical information about its application to CFU enumeration procedures for probiotics using a simulated example and data set. Data collected in a manufacturer's development laboratory is included to support application of the concept. Implementation of APLM can lead to reduced variability by identifying specific factors (e.g., the dilution step) with significant impact on the variability and providing insights to procedural modifications that lead to process improvement. Understanding and control of the analytical procedure is improved by using these tools. The probiotics industry can confidently apply the information and analytical results generated to make decisions about processes and formulation, including overage requirements. One benefit of this approach is that companies can reduce overage costs. More reliable procedures for viable cell count determinations will improve the quality evaluation of probiotic products, and hence manufacturing procedures, while ensuring that products deliver clinically demonstrated beneficial doses., Competing Interests: All authors are members of the USP Probiotics Expert Panel. Some authors are employed by companies in the biotherapeutics or probiotics industry: CV and CP are employed by Bacthera and MP is employed by Probiotical Research srl. MW (Consultant), PB (Advanced Microbial Analytics Research Solutions) and JS (Eurofins Microbiology Laboratory) provide services or work for companies that provide services to the biotherapeutics or probiotics industry. VG and BK are employed by the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, which operates in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Weitzel, Vegge, Pane, Goldman, Koshy, Porsby, Burguière and Schoeni.)

In a rapidly growing global probiotic market, end-users have difficulty distinguishing between high quality and poor quality products. This ambiguity threatens the trust consumers and healthcare providers have in probiotic products. To address this problem, we recommend that companies undergo third-party evaluations to certify probiotic quality and label accuracy. In order to communicate about product quality to end-users, indication of certification on product labels is helpful, although not all manufacturers choose to use this approach. Herein we discuss: third-party certification, the process of setting standards for identity, purity, and quantification of probiotics; some emerging methodologies useful for quality assessment; and some technical challenges unique to managing quality of live microbial products. This review provides insights of an Expert Panel engaged in this process and aims to update the reader on relevant current scientific methodologies. Establishing validated methodologies for all aspects of quality assessment is an essential component of this process and can be facilitated by established organizations, such as United States Pharmacopeia. Emerging methodologies including whole genome sequencing and flow cytometry are poised to play important roles in these processes.

Recent demonstration that probiotics administration has positive effects on mood state in healthy populations suggests its possible role as an adjunctive therapy for depression in clinical populations and as a non-invasive strategy to prevent depressive mood state in healthy individuals. The present study extends current knowledge on the beneficial effects of probiotics on psychological well-being, as measured by changes in mood (e.g., cognitive reactivity to sad mood, depression, and anxiety), personality dimensions, and quality of sleep, which have been considered as related to mood. For this double-blind, placebo-controlled study 38 healthy volunteers assigned to an experimental or control group assumed a daily dose of a probiotic mixture (containing Lactobacillus fermentum LF16, L. rhamnosus LR06, L. plantarum LP01, and Bifidobacterium longum BL04) or placebo, respectively, for 6 weeks. Mood, personality dimensions, and sleep quality were assessed four times (before the beginning of the study, at 3 and 6 weeks, and at 3 weeks of washout). A significant improvement in mood was observed in the experimental group, with a reduction in depressive mood state, anger, and fatigue, and an improvement in sleep quality. No between-groups differences were found. These findings corroborate the positive effect of probiotics on mood state and suggest that probiotics administration may improve psychological well-being by ameliorating aspects of mood and sleep quality.