Search

Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) can originate in different parts of the body, including the head, neck, lung, bronchus, cervix uteri, esophagus, and cardia, and subsequently metastasize to the stomach. Primary gastric squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC) is a rare disease. To better understand GSCC, we present the case of a 72-year-old woman with a primary GSCC. A chest and abdominal CT scan highlighted a 36×26 mm mass with a 41 mm longitudinal diameter, which included the origin of the celiac tripod. The disease appeared to originate exophytically from the gastric wall. An ultrasound-endoscopy showed a hypoechoic formation with not well-defined margins measuring 40×30 mm involving the origin of the celiac tripod, about 10 mm from the gastric wall. An endoscopic fine-needle aspiration showed a poorly differentiated carcinoma. A PET/CT scan showed a hyperaccumulation of the known expansive formation at the celiac tripod (SUV 11.9) without specific cleavage planes from the stomach. A gastroscopy showed a regular esophagus and an absence of gastric protruding lesions. In the subcardial area, on the posterior wall, there was a slightly raised sub-centimetric area covered by bleeding mucosa where the biopsy had been performed. The pathological report showed chronic gastritis. An eco-endoscopy confirmed a hypoechoic neoformation measuring 30×40 mm that appeared to originate from the muscular layer of the gastric wall. The biopsy report was positive for broad-spectrum cytokeratins (AE1/AE3), CK5/6/7, p40, p63 and negative for CK20, PAS, TTF-1, anti-smooth muscle actin, CD45 (LCA), ERG, and S100. The clinical picture suggested poorly differentiated carcinoma with squamous differentiation. We analyzed the main classifications of GSCC cases and compared their characteristics. It is clear that to have an appropriate definition of GSCC, well-defined diagnostic criteria are needed. Currently, there is no consensus. For practical purposes, it would be better to include a panel of CK and p40 to distinguish GSCC from adenocarcinoma. A GSCC outside the mucosa is not rare and could be a true entity., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Monti, Limarzi, Oboldi, Sbrancia, Pallotti, Miserocchi, Ghini, Zanuccoli, Cagnazzo and Frassineti.)

Background: Prognostication can be used within a tailored decision-making process to achieve a more personalized approach to the care of patients with cancer. This prospective observational study evaluated the accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic score (PaP score) to predict survival in patients identified by oncologists as candidates for palliative radiotherapy (PRT). We also studied interrater variability for the clinical prediction of survival and PaP scores and assessed the accuracy of the Survival Prediction Score (SPS) and TEACHH score., Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients were enrolled at first access to our Radiotherapy and Palliative Care Outpatient Clinic. The discriminating ability of the prognostic models was assessed using Harrell's C index, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained by bootstrapping., Results: In total, 255 patients with metastatic cancer were evaluated, and 123 (48.2%) were selected for PRT, all of whom completed treatment without interruption. Then, 10.6% of the irradiated patients who died underwent treatment within the last 30 days of life. The PaP score showed an accuracy of 74.8 (95% CI, 69.5-80.1) for radiation oncologist (RO) and 80.7 (95% CI, 75.9-85.5) for palliative care physician (PCP) in predicting 30-day survival. The accuracy of TEACHH was 76.1 (95% CI, 70.9-81.3) and 64.7 (95% CI, 58.8-70.6) for RO and PCP, respectively, and the accuracy of SPS was 70 (95% CI, 64.4-75.6) and 72.8 (95% CI, 67.3-78.3)., Conclusion: Accurate prognostication can identify candidates for low-fraction PRT during the last days of life who are more likely to complete the planned treatment without interruption.All the scores showed good discriminating capacity; the PaP had the higher accuracy, especially when used in a multidisciplinary way., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Maltoni, Scarpi, Dall’Agata, Micheletti, Pallotti, Pieri, Ricci, Romeo, Tenti, Tontini and Rossi.)