Search

Objective: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a technique to measure electrical properties of tissue. With the progress of modern integrated circuits and microchips, EIT instrumentation becomes an active research area to improve all aspects of device performance. Plenty of studies on EIT hardware have been presented in prestigious journals. This study explores publications on EIT hardware to identify the developing hotspots and trends.Method: Publications covering EIT hardware on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from 1989 to 2021 were collected for bibliometric analysis. CiteSpace and VOS viewer were used to study the characteristics of the publications.Main results: A total of 592 publications were analyzed, showing that the number of annual publications steadily increased. China, England, and South Korea were the most prolific countries on EIT hardware publications with productive native institutions and authors. Research topics spread out in “bio-electrical impedance imaging”, “hardware optimization”, “algorithms” and “clinical applications” (e.g., tissue, lung, brain, and oncology). Hardware research in “pulmonary” and “hemodynamic” applications focused on monitoring and were represented by silhouette recognition and dynamic imaging while research in “tumor and tissue” and “brain” applications focused on diagnosis and were represented by optimization of precision. Electrode development was a research focus through the years. Imaging precision and bioavailability of hardware optimization may be the future trend.Conclusion: Overall, system performance, particularly in the areas of system bandwidth and precision in applications may be the future directions of hardware research.

Objective: Spatial and temporal ventilation distributions in patients with acute respiratory failure during high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy were previously studied with electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The aim of the study was to explore the possibility of predicting HFNC failure based on various EIT-derived parameters.Methods: High flow nasal cannula failure was defined reintubation within 48 h after HFNC. EIT was performed with the patients spontaneously breathing in the supine position at the start of HFNC. EIT-based indices (comprising the global inhomogeneity index, center of ventilation, ventilation delay, rapid shallow breathing index, minute volume, and inspiration to expiration time) were explored and evaluated at three time points (prior to HFNC, T1; 30 min after HFNC started, T2; and 1 h after, T3).Results: A total of 46 subjects were included in the final analysis. Eleven subjects had failed HFNC. The time to failure was 27.8 ± 12.4 h. The ROX index (defined as SpO2/FiO2/respiratory rate) for HFNC success patients was 8.3 ± 2.7 and for HFNC failure patients, 6.2 ± 1.8 (p = 0.23). None of the investigated EIT-based parameters showed significant differences between subjects with HFNC failure and success. Further subgroup analysis indicated that a significant difference in ventilation inhomogeneity was found between ARDS and non-ARDS [0.54 (0.37) vs. 0.46 (0.28) as evaluated with GI, p < 0.01]. Ventilation homogeneity significantly improved in ARDS after 60-min HFNC treatment [0.59 (0.20) vs 0.57 (0.19), T1 vs. T3, p < 0.05].Conclusion: Spatial and temporal ventilation distributions were slightly but insignificantly different between the HFNC success and failure groups. HFNC failure could not be predicted by changes in EIT temporal and spatial indexes of ventilation distribution within the first hour. Further studies are required to predict the outcomes of HFNC.