1. Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies
- Author
-
Kate S. Gaudry, Hasan Ayaz, Avery Bedows, Pablo Celnik, David Eagleman, Pulkit Grover, Judy Illes, Rajesh P. N. Rao, Jacob T. Robinson, Krishnan Thyagarajan, The Working Group on Brain-Interfacing Devices in 2040, Nena Bains, John Brigagliano, Robert Carter, Caleb Kemere, Mark P. Mathison, Jon Neiditz, Karen Rommelfanger, and Joseph Snyder
- Subjects
Recall ,General Neuroscience ,non-invasive ,Non invasive ,Less invasive ,brain stimulation ,Societal impact of nanotechnology ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,minutely invasive ,Review ,ethics ,neuroethics ,Mood ,brain interfacing ,Brain stimulation ,Neuroethics ,Psychology ,brain recording ,RC321-571 ,Neuroscience ,policy ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Traditionally, recording from and stimulating the brain with high spatial and temporal resolution required invasive means. However, recently, the technical capabilities of less invasive and non-invasive neuro-interfacing technology have been dramatically improving, and laboratories and funders aim to further improve these capabilities. These technologies can facilitate functions such as multi-person communication, mood regulation and memory recall. We consider a potential future where the less invasive technology is in high demand. Will this demand match that the current-day demand for a smartphone? Here, we draw upon existing research to project which particular neuroethics issues may arise in this potential future and what preparatory steps may be taken to address these issues.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF