Search

Donor/recipient molecular human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch predicts primary B-cell alloimmune activation, yet the impact on de novo donor-specific T-cell alloimmunity (dnDST) remains undetermined. The hypothesis of our study is that donor/recipient HLA mismatches assessed at the molecular level may also influence a higher susceptibility to the development of posttransplant primary T-cell alloimmunity. In this prospective observational study, 169 consecutive kidney transplant recipients without preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and with high resolution donor/recipient HLA typing were evaluated for HLA molecular mismatch scores using different informatic algorithms [amino acid mismatch, eplet MM, and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II)]. Primary donor-specific alloimmune activation over the first 2 years posttransplantation was assessed by means of both dnDSA and dnDST using single antigen bead (SAB) and IFN-γ ELISPOT assays, respectively. Also, the predominant alloantigen presenting pathway priming DST alloimmunity and the contribution of main alloreactive T-cell subsets were further characterized in vitro. Pretransplantation, 78/169 (46%) were DST+ whereas 91/169 (54%) DST−. At 2 years, 54/169 (32%) patients showed detectable DST responses: 23/54 (42%) dnDST and 31/54 (57%) persistently positive (persistDST+). 24/169 (14%) patients developed dnDSA. A strong correlation was observed between the three distinct molecular mismatch scores and they all accurately predicted dnDSA formation, in particular at the DQ locus. Likewise, HLA molecular incompatibility predicted the advent of dnDST, especially when assessed by PIRCHE-II score (OR 1.014 95% CI 1.001–1.03, p=0.04). While pretransplant DST predicted the development of posttransplant BPAR (OR 5.18, 95% CI=1.64–16.34, p=0.005) and particularly T cell mediated rejection (OR 5.33, 95% CI=1.45–19.66, p=0.012), patients developing dnDST were at significantly higher risk of subsequent dnDSA formation (HR 2.64, 95% CI=1.08–6.45, p=0.03). In vitro experiments showed that unlike preformed DST that is predominantly primed by CD8+ direct pathway T cells, posttransplant DST may also be activated by the indirect pathway of alloantigen presentation, and predominantly driven by CD4+ alloreactive T cells in an important proportion of patients. De novo donor-specific cellular alloreactivity seems to precede subsequent humoral alloimmune activation and is influenced by a poor donor/recipient HLA molecular matching.

Suboptimal doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are frequently employed in renal transplant (Tx) patients, with drug-related side effects or low weight. The aim of this study was to compare the mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetic profile and its pharmacodynamic effect on patients receiving either standard (2 g) or low (1.5 g or 1 g) MMF doses, in order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of such low doses in inhibiting IMPDH activity. Twenty-seven stable renal Tx recipients aged 18-65 years, with a post-Tx follow-up of 38.5 +/- 44.8 months (6-166 months), receiving 1 g (n = 10), 0.75 g (n = 7) and 0.5 g (n = 10) MMF twice a day in association with cyclosporine and prednisone, were included. The control group was made up of untreated healthy volunteers (n = 5). Plasma concentrations of MPA were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC. IMPDH activity was determined in lymphocytes by the measurement of 3H release from [2,8-(3)H] hypoxantine. The mean value of areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC(0-12)) of MPA throughout the 12-h dosing interval in patients treated with 2 g was higher than the corresponding data in patients receiving 1.5 g or 1 g bid, but no statistical differences were observed between the three groups. There was no correlation between MPA-AUC(0-12) values and MMF dose (expressed in g/day or g/kg per day). Predose MPA concentrations correlated only weakly with the respective MPA-AUC(0-12) values (r2 from 0.385 to 0.655), whereas an acceptable correlation was observed between MPA Cmax and MPA-AUC(0-12) (r2 from 0.626 to 0.759) in 2 g, 1.5 g, and 1 g MMF groups. An inverse relationship between MPA concentrations and IMPDH activity was observed. In general, the maximum MPA concentration was achieved from 1 h to 2 h after dosing, and the maximum inhibition of IMPDH was also from 1 h to 2 h after dosing. The evaluation of IMPDH activity demonstrated that there was a significant statistical difference between samples from 0 to 1 h (P = 0.008) and 0 to 2 h (P = 0.04). In conclusion, concentration-time profiles of renal transplant recipients administered 0.75 g and 0.5 g twice a day are slightly lower than those from the 2 g group, but nor significantly. On the other hand, inhibition of IMPDH activity was comparable in the three groups, indicating considerable interindividual pharmacodynamic variability. Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the degree of immunosuppression and its correlation with MPA plasma concentrations will be assessed further in future studies.