Search

IntroductionLimited survival data are available for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who stop immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) early for reasons other than progression of disease (POD), such as immune-related adverse events (irAEs).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of all patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, with or without combination chemotherapy, at 3 Mayo Clinic sites between 2011 and 2022. Separate analyses were conducted at 6- and 12-month intervals. Patients who discontinued ICI due to POD prior to these time points were excluded from the analysis.ResultsA total of 246 patients with stage IV NSCLC used ICIs. Patients were then excluded if they had experienced POD prior to 6 or 12 months, resulting in 81 and 63 patients, respectively, for each timepoint. Sixty-four patients continued treatment beyond 6 months and were found to have longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the 17 patients who discontinued treatment (22.8 months vs 11.8 months, P =1.1E-04), as well as a significant increase in overall survival (OS) (33.9 months vs 14.4 months, P =7.2E-08). Forty patients continued treatment beyond 12 months and had longer PFS compared to the 23 patients that discontinued treatment (27.9 months vs 14.8 months, P =1.1E-04), as well as a significant increase in OS (39.7 months vs 18.0 months, P =2.0E-07). The most common reason for ICI discontinuation was irAEs. Other common reasons for stopping ICI were non-irAEs and stable disease. At both time points, 12 patients continued or restarted ICI after experiencing an irAE, and 2 patients experienced recurrent/new grade 1–2 irAEs. More patients continued/rechallenged with ICI after experiencing an irAE in the groups that continued ICI compared to those that discontinued ICI.ConclusionsPatients with mNSCLC and no POD who continued ICI beyond 6 months and 12 months, experienced significantly increased PFS and OS compared to patients who discontinued ICI, with larger increases in those who continued ICI past 12 months. Oncology providers should discuss the survival benefits of continuing ICI and offer support to overcome obstacles to continuation of treatment, if possible, particularly management of grade 1 and 2 irAEs.

BackgroundAtezolizumab is superior to docetaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the POPLAR and OAK trials. However, patients who received prior immunotherapy were excluded from these trials. The standard of care second-line therapy for these patients remains to be docetaxel with or without ramucirumab. The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a subsequent therapy in immunotherapy-pretreated patients are unknown.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of all patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were pretreated with immunotherapy at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville and Rochester from 2016 to 2022. Patients who received subsequent therapy of atezolizumab alone (Atezo), docetaxel (Doce), or docetaxel + ramucirumab (Doce+Ram) were included.ResultsIn this cohort of 165 patients, 12.7% (n=21), 49.1% (n=81), and 38.2% (n=63) patients received subsequent Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram, respectively. 1-year landmark progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.8%, 6.2%, and 3.2% (p=0.006), and 2-year landmark PFS were 14.3%, 0%, and 0% (p

The importance of the immune system in the response against cancer has always been a subject of intense investigation. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the landscape of oncologic treatments, while expanding the understanding of this disease’s pathophysiology. Consequently, many therapies are being investigated, with interventions directed at different steps and pathways of the immune response. Relevantly, immunotherapy sensitizers have arisen as approaches focused on the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Concomitantly, novel immunotherapy modalities are also in development. Approaches focusing from the tumor intrinsic pathways to the tumor microenvironment and ex-vivo interventions, such as CAR-T cell therapies and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are important examples. Although many of those interventions were initially envisioned as standalone options, their combination has demonstrated promising results in early-phase in vitro studies and clinical trials. The possibility of coupling different immunotherapy modalities, as well as with other techniques, further strengthen the concept of sensitizers, allowing for deeper and more robust responses in cancer treatment. This review aims to present an overview of the concepts of these sensitizing mechanisms that are the basis for the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and a multitude of therapeutic strategies. Novel immunotherapy modalities are also presented, focusing on the potential of combining them with sensitizer interventions. Understanding the complexity underlying these principles may be the key for future breakthroughs and improved patient outcomes.

IntroductionSurveillance with computed tomography (CT) imaging following curative treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is important to identify recurrence or second primary lung cancers (SPLC). The pattern and risks of recurrence following curative therapy and optimal duration of surveillance scans remain unknown. The objective of our study is to assess the pattern of recurrence and development of SPLC to risk stratify patients with stage I NSCLC following curative therapy.MethodsWe identified 261 patients who received curative therapy for stage I NSCLC at Mayo Clinic Florida. Data was collected on clinical and demographic features including gender, smoking history, stage, treatment, histologic subtype, and tumor grade. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the disease free survival (DFS). Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors for recurrence.ResultsNegative tobacco history and stage IA tumors were associated with significantly prolonged DFS after adjusting for co-variates (p=0.001 and p=0.005). Univariate Cox proportional hazards model identified tobacco history and stage 1B as risk factors for recurrence with unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.8 and 2.0, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, only stage IB was statistically significant predictor of recurrence with a hazard ratio of 2.1 (Confidence Interval (CI) 95% 1.2-3.6; p=0.007).ConclusionsAn individualized approach that considers risk factors of stage and smoking history may be useful in determining whether to continue annual CT surveillance after five years post curative therapy for stage I NSCLC.

BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma is a molecularly heterogeneous disease. Several studies, including The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) and Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC), explored the genetic alterations among different ethnic groups. However, minority groups are often under-represented in these relevant studies and the genomic alterations among racial groups are not fully understood.MethodsWe analyze genomic characteristics among racial groups to understand the diversities and their impact on clinical outcomes.ResultsNative Americans had significantly higher rates of insertions and deletions than other races (P

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the expression of different nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) as prognostic factors in lung cancer and any correlation among them. Since all of the above genes are typically upregulated in response to smoking, we hypothesized that a correlation might exist between DRD2, PD-L1, and nAChR expression in NSCLC patients with a smoking history and a prediction model may be developed to assess the clinical outcome.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed samples from 46 patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection at Mayo Clinic Rochester from June 2000 to October 2008. The expression of PD-L1, DRD2, CHRNA5, CHRNA7, and CHRNA9 were analyzed by quantitative PCR and correlated amongst themselves and with age, stage and grade, smoking status, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS).ResultsOnly PD-L1 showed a statistically significant increase in expression in patients older than 65. All the above genes showed higher expression in stage IIIB than IIIA, but none reached statistical significance. Interestingly, we did not observe significant differences among never, former, and current smokers, but patients with pack years greater than 30 showed significantly higher expression of CHRNA9. We observed a strong positive correlation between PD-L1/DRD2, PD-L1/CHRNA5, and CHRNA5/CHRNA7 and a weak positive correlation between DRD2/CHRNA5 and DRD2/CHRNA7. Older age was independently associated with poor OS, whereas lower CHRNA7 expression was independently associated with better OS.ConclusionsWe observed strong positive correlations among PD-L1, DRD2, and some of the nAChRs. We investigated their prognostic significance in lung cancer patients and found CHRNA7 to be an independent prognostic factor. Overall, the results obtained from this preliminary study warrant a large cohort-based analysis that may ultimately lead to potential patient-specific stratification biomarkers predicting cancer-treatment outcomes.

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with aggressive biology and limited treatment options, making this disease a historical challenge. The influence of race and socioeconomic status on the survival of stage IV SCLC remains mostly unknown. Our study is designed to investigate the clinical survival outcomes in Black and White patients with stage IV SCLC and study the demographic, socioeconomic, clinical features, and treatment patterns of the disease and their impact on survival in Blacks and Whites.Methods and ResultsStage IV SCLC cases from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were obtained. The follow-up endpoint is defined as death or the date of the last contact. Patients were divided into two groups by white and black. Features including demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, treatments and survival outcomes in Blacks and Whites were collected. Mortality hazard ratios of Blacks and Whites stage IV SCLC patients were analyzed. Survival of stage IV SCLC Black and White patients was also analyzed. Adjusted hazard ratios were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression models. Patients’ median follow-up time was 8.18 (2.37-15.84) months. Overall survival at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52.4%, 25.7%, 13.2% and 7.9% in Blacks in compared to 51.0%, 23.6%, 11.5% and 6.9% in Whites. White patients had significantly higher socioeconomic status than Black patients. By contrast, Blacks were found associated with younger age at diagnosis, a significantly higher chance of receiving radiation therapy and treatments at an academic/research program. Compared to Whites, Blacks had a 9% decreased risk of death.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that Blacks have significant socioeconomic disadvantages compared to Whites. However, despite these unfavorable factors, survival for Blacks was significantly improved compared to Whites after covariable adjustment. This may be due to Blacks with Stage IV SCLC having a higher chance of receiving radiation therapy and treatments at an academic/research program. Identifying and removing the barriers to obtaining treatments at academic/research programs or improving the management in non-academic centers could improve the overall survival of stage IV SCLC.

While first line targeted therapies are the current standard of care treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable mutations, the cancer cells inevitably acquire resistance to these agents over time. Immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the outcomes of metastatic NSCLC, however, its efficacy in those with targetable drivers is largely unknown. In this manuscript, we reviewed the published data on ICI therapies in NSCLC with ALK, ROS1, BRAF, c-MET, RET, NTRK, KRAS, and HER2 (ERBB2) alterations. We found that the objective response rates (ORRs) associated with ICI treatments in lung cancers harboring the BRAF (0–54%), c-MET (12–49%), and KRAS (18.7-66.7%) alterations were comparable to non-mutant NSCLC, whereas the ORRs in RET fusion NSCLC (less than10% in all studies but one) and ALK fusion NSCLC (0%) were relatively low. The ORRs reported in small numbers of patients and studies of ROS1 fusion, NTRK fusion, and HER 2 mutant NSCLC were 0–17%, 50% and 7–23%, respectively, making the efficacy of ICIs in these groups of patients less clear. In most studies, no significant correlation between treatment outcome and PD-L1 expression or tumor mutation burden (TMB) was identified, and how to select patients with NSCLC harboring actionable mutations who will likely benefit from ICI treatment remains unknown.

Over the last decade, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone rapid changes with innovations in oncogene-directed therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC, newer-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are providing unparalleled survival benefit and tolerability. Unfortunately, most patients will experience disease progression and thus an urgent need exists for improved subsequent lines of therapies. The concurrent revolution in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is providing novel treatment options with improved clinical outcomes in wild-type EGFR (EGFRwt) NSCLC; however, the application of ICI therapy to advanced EGFRm NSCLC patients is controversial. Early studies demonstrated the inferiority of ICI monotherapy to EGFR TKI therapy in the first line setting and inferiority to chemotherapy in the second line setting. Additionally, combination ICI and EGFR TKI therapies have demonstrated increased toxicities, and EGFR TKI therapy given after first-line ICI therapy has been correlated with severe adverse events. Nonetheless, combination therapies including dual-ICI blockade and ICI, chemotherapy, and angiogenesis inhibitor combinations are areas of active study with some intriguing signals in preliminary studies. Here, we review previous and ongoing clinical studies of ICI therapy in advanced EGFRm NSCLC. We discuss advances in understanding the differences in the tumor biology and tumor microenvironment (TME) of EGFRm NSCLC tumors that may lead to novel approaches to enhance ICI efficacy. It is our goal to equip the reader with a knowledge of current therapies, past and current clinical trials, and active avenues of research that provide the promise of novel approaches and improved outcomes for patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC.

Introduction: Limited survival data are available for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who stop immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) early for reasons other than progression of disease (POD), such as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, with or without combination chemotherapy, at 3 Mayo Clinic sites between 2011 and 2022. Separate analyses were conducted at 6- and 12-month intervals. Patients who discontinued ICI due to POD prior to these time points were excluded from the analysis. Results: A total of 246 patients with stage IV NSCLC used ICIs. Patients were then excluded if they had experienced POD prior to 6 or 12 months, resulting in 81 and 63 patients, respectively, for each timepoint. Sixty-four patients continued treatment beyond 6 months and were found to have longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the 17 patients who discontinued treatment (22.8 months vs 11.8 months, P =1.1E-04), as well as a significant increase in overall survival (OS) (33.9 months vs 14.4 months, P =7.2E-08). Forty patients continued treatment beyond 12 months and had longer PFS compared to the 23 patients that discontinued treatment (27.9 months vs 14.8 months, P =1.1E-04), as well as a significant increase in OS (39.7 months vs 18.0 months, P =2.0E-07). The most common reason for ICI discontinuation was irAEs. Other common reasons for stopping ICI were non-irAEs and stable disease. At both time points, 12 patients continued or restarted ICI after experiencing an irAE, and 2 patients experienced recurrent/new grade 1-2 irAEs. More patients continued/rechallenged with ICI after experiencing an irAE in the groups that continued ICI compared to those that discontinued ICI. Conclusions: Patients with mNSCLC and no POD who continued ICI beyond 6 months and 12 months, experienced significantly increased PFS and OS compared to patients who discontinued ICI, with larger increases in those who continued ICI past 12 months. Oncology providers should discuss the survival benefits of continuing ICI and offer support to overcome obstacles to continuation of treatment, if possible, particularly management of grade 1 and 2 irAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The importance of the immune system in the response against cancer has always been a subject of intense investigation. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the landscape of oncologic treatments, while expanding the understanding of this disease's pathophysiology. Consequently, many therapies are being investigated, with interventions directed at different steps and pathways of the immune response. Relevantly, immunotherapy sensitizers have arisen as approaches focused on the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Concomitantly, novel immunotherapy modalities are also in development. Approaches focusing from the tumor intrinsic pathways to the tumor microenvironment and ex-vivo interventions, such as CAR-T cell therapies and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are important examples. Although many of those interventions were initially envisioned as standalone options, their combination has demonstrated promising results in early-phase in vitro studies and clinical trials. The possibility of coupling different immunotherapy modalities, as well as with other techniques, further strengthen the concept of sensitizers, allowing for deeper and more robust responses in cancer treatment. This review aims to present an overview of the concepts of these sensitizing mechanisms that are the basis for the synergistic effects of immunotherapy combination, or the combination of immunotherapy and a multitude of therapeutic strategies. Novel immunotherapy modalities are also presented, focusing on the potential of combining them with sensitizer interventions. Understanding the complexity underlying these principles may be the key for future breakthroughs and improved patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Surveillance with computed tomography (CT) imaging following curative treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is important to identify recurrence or second primary lung cancers (SPLC). The pattern and risks of recurrence following curative therapy and optimal duration of surveillance scans remain unknown. The objective of our study is to assess the pattern of recurrence and development of SPLC to risk stratify patients with stage I NSCLC following curative therapy. Methods: We identified 261 patients who received curative therapy for stage I NSCLC at Mayo Clinic Florida. Data was collected on clinical and demographic features including gender, smoking history, stage, treatment, histologic subtype, and tumor grade. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the disease free survival (DFS). Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors for recurrence. Results: Negative tobacco history and stage IA tumors were associated with significantly prolonged DFS after adjusting for co-variates (p=0.001 and p=0.005). Univariate Cox proportional hazards model identified tobacco history and stage 1B as risk factors for recurrence with unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.8 and 2.0, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, only stage IB was statistically significant predictor of recurrence with a hazard ratio of 2.1 (Confidence Interval (CI) 95% 1.2-3.6; p=0.007). Conclusions: An individualized approach that considers risk factors of stage and smoking history may be useful in determining whether to continue annual CT surveillance after five years post curative therapy for stage I NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the expression of different nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), programmed death ligand-1 (PDL1), and dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) as prognostic factors in lung cancer and any correlation among them. Since all of the above genes are typically upregulated in response to smoking, we hypothesized that a correlation might exist between DRD2, PD-L1, and nAChR expression in NSCLC patients with a smoking history and a prediction model may be developed to assess the clinical outcome. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed samples from 46 patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection at Mayo Clinic Rochester from June 2000 to October 2008. The expression of PD-L1, DRD2, CHRNA5, CHRNA7, and CHRNA9 were analyzed by quantitative PCR and correlated amongst themselves and with age, stage and grade, smoking status, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: Only PD-L1 showed a statistically significant increase in expression in patients older than 65. All the above genes showed higher expression in stage IIIB than IIIA, but none reached statistical significance. Interestingly, we did not observe significant differences among never, former, and current smokers, but patients with pack years greater than 30 showed significantly higher expression of CHRNA9. We observed a strong positive correlation between PD-L1/DRD2, PD-L1/CHRNA5, and CHRNA5/CHRNA7 and a weak positive correlation between DRD2/CHRNA5 and DRD2/CHRNA7. Older age was independently associated with poor OS, whereas lower CHRNA7 expression was independently associated with better OS. Conclusions: We observed strong positive correlations among PD-L1, DRD2, and some of the nAChRs. We investigated their prognostic significance in lung cancer patients and found CHRNA7 to be an independent prognostic factor. Overall, the results obtained from this preliminary study warrant a large cohortbased analysis that may ultimately lead to potential patient-specific stratification biomarkers predicting cancer-treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]