Search

As the physical and mental development of the young is not only influenced by the parent-child relationship (PR) and the student's academic performance, but also moderated by trait coping styles (TCS), the changes between these three during the online learning period in an epidemic need to be reconsidered. This study aims to explore the factors affecting online learning satisfaction (OLS) among students and their interaction with parent-child relationship and trait coping style. A web-based questionnaire was employed, encompassing general information, the Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ), and queries related to OLS. A total of 1,287 valid questionnaires were collected, with 593 from junior high school students, 197 from high school students, and 497 from university students. Our findings indicate that parent-child relationship (PR), positive coping style (PCS), and learning status (LS) showed a positive correlation with OLS (r=0.110, P

This article adopts a human rights approach to observe Japan’s policy on releasing nuclear contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean. It aims to provide a new discourse for stakeholders to push Japan to deal with Fukushima’s water in a responsible way. In doing so, it needs to elucidate an important normative question, namely whether a State has extraterritorial human rights obligations, given that international human rights law was traditionally perceived to deal with relationship between a State and its population. This stereotype would frustrate the world people to challenge the Japan’s decision based on human rights. In the era of economic globalization, however, there is an increasing need for the extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. Human rights theory and practice have gradually developed the jurisprudence on extraterritorial obligations of States based on an interpretation of jurisdiction. Such an approach has expanded from regulating State overseas military actions to tackling trans-boundary environmental harms. In the latter sense, the Fukushima incident is a good case, which urgently calls for a comprehensive examination of Japan’s extraterritorial human rights obligations. This article undertakes such a task by providing a logical interpretation of human rights treaty provisions. It is argued that the release of nuclear contaminated water entails a variety of extraterritorial obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights on the part of Japan.