Search

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is a public health issue, with low dietary vitamin D intakes a contributing factor. Rates of vitamin D deficiency are 31% in Australia, and up to 72% in some regions globally. While supplementation is often prescribed as an alternative to additional sun exposure, complementary approaches including food-based solutions are needed. Yet, food-centric dietary guidelines are not always adequate for meeting vitamin D needs. Edible mushrooms such as Agaricus bisporus can produce over 100% of vitamin D recommendations (10 μg/day, Institute of Medicine) per 75 g serve (18 μg) on exposure to UV-light, with the vitamin D2 produced showing good stability during cooking and processing. However, mushrooms are overlooked as a vitamin D source in dietary guidelines. Our dietary modelling shows that four serves/week of UV-exposed button mushrooms can support most Australian adults in meeting vitamin D recommendations, and UV-exposed mushrooms have been found to increase vitamin D status in deficient individuals. While recent evidence suggests some differences between vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 in physiological activities, vitamin D2 from mushrooms can be part of a larger solution to increasing dietary vitamin D intakes, as well as an important focus for public health policy. Mushrooms exposed to UV represent an important tool in the strategic toolkit for addressing vitamin D deficiency in Australia and globally. Health authorities lead the recognition and promotion of mushrooms as a natural, vegan, safe, and sustainable vitamin D food source.

BackgroundThe double burden of malnutrition and diet-related disease has been attributed to diets high in ultra-processed and discretionary foods, with increased sugars, saturated fats, and sodium, and insufficient dietary fibre. There is a limited understanding of the role of other macronutrients and micronutrients.ObjectiveDetermine the highest priority nutrients to address both malnutrition and diet-related disease in Australia and New Zealand, for each demographic group and the total population.MethodsA novel four-step methodological approach was undertaken to identify: 1. Demographic (age-sex) groups; 2. Health priorities; 3. Potential nutrients based on inadequacy, increased requirements, and health priority association; and 4. Priority nutrients. Nutrient intake data was obtained from the most recent Australian and New Zealand nutrition surveys. Health priorities were based on national statistical data and expert consultation. High-level scientific literature (systematic reviews) was scoped for associations with health priorities and the suitability of recommended intakes. A quantitative scoring matrix was developed and used to determine the highest priority nutrients, with scoring over three domains: extent of inadequacy; consensus for increased requirements; and degree of association with health priorities.ResultsNutritional inadequacies were common, with 22 of 31 essential nutrients consumed below recommended levels. Nine priority nutrients were identified across the demographic groups, with each demographic group characterised by a specific subset of these. Six nutrients were highest priority within the total population: vitamin D, calcium, omega-3 fatty acids, magnesium, folate, dietary fibre.ConclusionThe extent of nutritional inadequacies in Australia and New Zealand is high, both within each demographic group and the entire population, relative to both recommended intakes and key health outcomes. The methodology can be applied to other countries and globally. Findings make a significant contribution to understanding the nutrients to prioritise in future-proofing the health of the Australian and New Zealand populations. Guidelines and policies can target priority nutrients to address the malnutrition and diet-related disease double burden.

Background:Nutrient criteria underlying front-of-pack food labeling programs can play an important role in improving dietary intakes. Currently, no methodology for the development or update of nutrient criteria has been published, nor the methods used by food regulatory bodies. The scientific publication of methodology outlining the development and update of nutrient criteria underpinning front-of-pack food labeling programs highlighting healthier food choices is needed.ObjectiveTo develop and provide a globally applicable and transparent methodology for researchers to follow when reviewing existing or developing new nutrient criteria for front-of-pack labeling.MethodsThe Nutrient Criteria Methodology involved five phases: Phase I, the development of guiding principles; Phase II, collection of information for subsequent phases, including a pre-scope of the literature and selection of food composition database(s) for modeling; Phase III, literature review of all possible nutrients relevant to the nutrient criteria; Phase IV, database modeling to set quantitative limits for each selected nutrient; Phase V, assessment of the criteria against an established nutritional quality assessment tool. As an example, the methodology was applied to the update of the GI Symbol Product Eligibility and Nutrient Criteria (PENC).ResultsA comprehensive and replicable methodology, based on best practice protocols and ensuring both scientific credibility and practicality of use by industry, was developed. Application of the five phases of the methodology to the GI Symbol PENC highlighted the ability of the methodology to uncover nutritional measures currently missing in many nutrient criteria for front-of-pack food labeling programs and other national food labeling systems, such as glycemic load and the unsaturated to saturated fat ratio. Foods achieving the PENC had a higher Health Star Rating than foods not achieving the PENC.ConclusionOur Nutrient Criteria Methodology can be applied to the development and update of global nutrient criteria underpinning front-of-pack food labeling programs. Further research into the implementation of additional nutritional measures found to be important for human health is recommended, with the goal of the prevention of diet-related disease.