Search

IntroductionOne of the main causes of treatment failure in bacterial prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is biofilm formation. The topography of the biofilm may be associated with susceptibility to antimicrobial treatment. The aims of this study were to assess differences in topography of biofilms on different implant materials and the correlation thereof with susceptibility to antimicrobial treatment.MethodsMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 7-day mature biofilms were generated on disks made from titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-6Al-4V), synthetic polymer and orthopedic bone cement, commonly used in implant surgery. The surface topography of these implant materials and the biofilms cultured on them was assessed using atomic force microscopy. This provided detailed images, as well as average roughness (Ra) and peak-to-valley roughness (Rt) values in nanometers, of the biofilm and the material surfaces. Bacterial counts within biofilms were assessed microbiologically. Antimicrobial treatment of biofilms was performed by 24-h exposure to the combination of rifampicin and ciprofloxacin in concentrations of 1-, 5- and 10-times the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Finally, treatment-induced differences in bacterial loads and their correlation with biofilm surface parameters were assessed.ResultsThe biofilm surfaces on titanium alloys Ti-6Al-7Nb (Ra = 186 nm) and Ti-6Al-4V (Ra = 270 nm) were less rough than those of biofilms on silicone (Ra = 636 nm). The highest roughness was observed for biofilms on orthopedic bone cement with an Ra of 1,551 nm. Interestingly, the roughness parameters of the titanium alloys themselves were lower than the value for silicone, whereas the surface of the bone cement was the roughest. Treatment with 1- and 5-times the MBC of antibiotics resulted in inter-material differences in colony forming units (CFU) counts, ultimately showing comparable reductions of 2.4–3.0 log CFU/mL at the highest tested concentration. No significant differences in bacterial loads within MRSA biofilms were observed between the various implant materials, upon exposure to increasing concentrations of antibiotics.DiscussionThe surface parameters of MRSA biofilms were determined by those of the implant materials on which they were formed. The antibiotic susceptibility of MRSA biofilms on the various tested implant materials did not differ, indicating that the efficacy of antibiotics was not affected by the roughness of the biofilm.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of arthroplasty. Due to biofilm and persister formation current treatment strategies often fail. Therefore, innovative anti-biofilm and anti-persister agents are urgently needed. Antimicrobial peptides with their broad antibacterial activities may be such candidates. An in vitro model simulating PJI comprising of rifampicin/ciprofloxacin-exposed, mature methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms on polystyrene plates, titanium/aluminium/niobium disks, and prosthetic joint liners were developed. Bacteria obtained from and residing within these biofilms were exposed to SAAP-148, acyldepsipeptide-4, LL-37, and pexiganan. Microcalorimetry was used to monitor the heat flow by the bacteria in these models. Daily exposure of mature biofilms to rifampicin/ciprofloxacin for 3 days resulted in a 4-log reduction of MRSA. Prolonged antibiotic exposure did not further reduce bacterial counts. Microcalorimetry confirmed the low metabolic activity of these persisters. SAAP-148 and pexiganan, but not LL-37, eliminated the persisters while ADEP4 reduced the number of persisters. SAAP-148 further eradicated persisters within antibiotics-exposed, mature biofilms on the various surfaces. To conclude, antibiotic-exposed, mature MRSA biofilms on various surfaces have been developed as in vitro models for PJI. SAAP-148 is highly effective against persisters obtained from the biofilms as well as within these models. Antibiotics-exposed, mature biofilms on relevant surfaces can be instrumental in the search for novel treatment strategies to combat biofilm-associated infections.

Over the past decades the use of medical devices, such as catheters, artificial heart valves, prosthetic joints, and other implants, has grown significantly. Despite continuous improvements in device design, surgical procedures, and wound care, biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) are still a major problem in modern medicine. Conventional antibiotic treatment often fails due to the low levels of antibiotic at the site of infection. The presence of biofilms on the biomaterial and/or the multidrug-resistant phenotype of the bacteria further impair the efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Removal of the biomaterial is then the last option to control the infection. Clearly, there is a pressing need for alternative strategies to prevent and treat BAI. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered promising candidates as they are active against a broad spectrum of (antibiotic-resistant) planktonic bacteria and biofilms. Moreover, bacteria are less likely to develop resistance to these rapidly-acting peptides. In this review we highlight the four main strategies, three of which applying AMPs, in biomedical device manufacturing to prevent BAI. The first involves modification of the physicochemical characteristics of the surface of implants. Immobilization of AMPs on surfaces of medical devices with a variety of chemical techniques is essential in the second strategy. The main disadvantage of these two strategies relates to the limited antibacterial effect in the tissue surrounding the implant. This limitation is addressed by the third strategy that releases AMPs from a coating in a controlled fashion. Lastly, AMPs can be integrated in the design and manufacturing of additively manufactured/3D-printed implants, owing to the physicochemical characteristics of the implant material and the versatile manufacturing technologies compatible with antimicrobials incorporation. These novel technologies utilizing AMPs will contribute to development of novel and safe antimicrobial medical devices, reducing complications and associated costs of device infection.