1. Optimization of the k2′ Parameter Estimation for the Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dynamic PIB PET Scans Using SRTM2
- Author
-
Débora E. Peretti, Fransje E. Reesink, Janine Doorduin, Bauke M. de Jong, Peter P. De Deyn, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Ronald Boellaard, and David Vállez García
- Subjects
Alzheimer's disease ,pharmacokinetic modeling ,Pittsburgh compound B ,SRTM ,SRTM2 ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Background: This study explores different approaches to estimate the clearance rate of the reference tissue (k2′) parameter used for pharmacokinetic modeling, using the simplified reference tissue model 2 (SRMT2) and further explores the effect on the binding potential (BPND) of 11C-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB) PET scans.Methods: Thirty subjects underwent a dynamic PIB PET scan and were classified as PIB positive (+) or negative (–). Thirteen regions were defined from where to estimate k2′: the whole brain, eight anatomical region based on the Hammer's atlas, one region based on a SPM comparison between groups on a voxel level, and three regions using different BPNDSRTM thresholds.Results: The different approaches resulted in distinct k2′ estimations per subject. The median value of the estimated k2′ across all subjects in the whole brain was 0.057. In general, PIB+ subjects presented smaller k2′ estimates than this median, and PIB–, larger. Furthermore, only threshold and white matter methods resulted in non-significant differences between groups. Moreover, threshold approaches yielded the best correlation between BPNDSRTM and BPNDSRTM2 for both groups (R2 = 0.85 for PIB+, and R2 = 0.88 for PIB–). Lastly, a sensitivity analysis showed that overestimating k2′ values resulted in less biased BPNDSRTM2 estimates.Conclusion: Setting a threshold on BPNDSRTM might be the best method to estimate k2′ in voxel-based modeling approaches, while the use of a white matter region might be a better option for a volume of interest based analysis.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF