Search

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) via the cystic artery for treating patients with bleeding from the cystic artery.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent TAE via the cystic artery between January 2010 and May 2022. Radiological images and clinical data were reviewed to evaluate causes of bleeding, procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes. Technical success was defined as the disappearance of contrast media extravasation or pseudoaneurysm, as demonstrated on completion angiography. Clinical success was defined as discharge from the hospital without any bleeding-related issues.ResultsHemorrhagic cholecystitis (n = 10) was the most common cause of bleeding, followed by iatrogenic (n = 4), duodenal ulcer (n = 3), tumor (n = 2), and trauma (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all cases, and clinical success was achieved in 70% (n = 14) of patients. Three patients developed ischemic cholecystitis as a complication. Six patients with clinical failure died within 45 days after embolization.ConclusionTAE through the cystic artery has a high technical success rate in treating cystic artery bleeding, but clinical failure remains a common occurrence due to concurrent medical conditions and the development of ischemic cholecystitis.

IntroductionAlthough transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using yttrium-90 (90Y) is a treatment option for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a fraction of patients are ineligible for TARE due to high lung shunt fraction (LSF).MethodsWe evaluated if treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), owing to TARE ineligibility was associated with early HCC progression. Consecutive patients with HCC who were initially TARE candidates were included. Patients with vascular invasion or metastasis were excluded. Primary endpoints were time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was objective response rate.ResultsIn total, 175 patients were included: 144 underwent TARE (TARE-eligible group) and 31 underwent TACE due to high LSF (TARE-ineligible group). This latter group had larger tumors (13.8 cm vs. 7.8 cm, P

ObjectiveTo report the incidence of radiation pneumonitis after radioembolization.MethodsIn this retrospective study, from May 2009 to July 2021, 782 consecutive patients underwent radioembolization in two institutes. Medical internal radiation dose dosimetry and partition dosimetry were used for glass and resin Yttrium-90-labeled microspheres (90Y-microspheres), respectively. Medical records and radiological findings were retrospectively evaluated with emphasis on the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis.ResultsOf the 732 patients with lung shunt study and follow-up, 13 (1.8%) had symptomatic radiation pneumonitis and six patients died due to radiation pneumonitis. Of the 721 patients whose lung doses were calculated, 10 patients who were treated with glass (n = 5) and resin (n = 5) 90Y-microspheres had radiation pneumonitis. No significant statistical difference between glass and resin 90Y-microspheres (p = 0.304) was noted in terms of radiation pneumonitis incidence. Among the patients with radiation pneumonitis, all five patients treated with glass 90Y-microspheres had estimated lung doses > 29 Gy, whereas five patients treated with resin 90Y-microspheres had relatively wide range of lung dose reaching much lower value (13.21Gy).ConclusionThe present study suggests that radiation pneumonitis after radioembolization may occur even though the manufacturer’s instructions are followed.

BackgroundA diverse clinical course after the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) renders nonstandardized treatment protocols.PurposeTo evaluate clinical course and role of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with rupture of HCC.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 127 patients who were treated for ruptured HCC at single institution between 2005 and 2014. After multidisciplinary discussion, patients underwent medical management, TAE, emergency surgery or staged surgery. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups based on the intent of treatment: curative and palliative. The rebleeding rate and 1-month and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups. The incidence and survival of patients with intraperitoneal drop metastasis (IPDM) were also analyzed.ResultsThe overall rebleeding rate in patients who underwent TAE was 3.1% (3/96). One-month mortality rate was 6.3% (8/127). The rebleeding and 1-month mortality rates were not significantly different between two groups. OS was significantly higher in the curative treatment group (median: 12.0 vs 2.2 months, p

Introduction: Although transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using yttrium-90 ( 90Y) is a treatment option for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a fraction of patients are ineligible for TARE due to high lung shunt fraction (LSF). Methods: We evaluated if treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), owing to TARE ineligibility was associated with early HCC progression. Consecutive patients with HCC who were initially TARE candidates were included. Patients with vascular invasion or metastasis were excluded. Primary endpoints were time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Results: In total, 175 patients were included: 144 underwent TARE (TARE-eligible group) and 31 underwent TACE due to high LSF (TARE-ineligible group). This latter group had larger tumors (13.8 cm vs. 7.8 cm, P<0.001) and higher MoRAL scores (1,385.8 vs. 413.3, P=0.002) than the TARE-eligible group. After balancing baseline characteristics with an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), the TAREineligible group showed shorter TTP [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.14–4.07, P=0.02] and OS (aHR=1.80, 95% CI=0.85–3.80, P=0.12), although the latter was not statistically significant. The TARE-ineligible group had a significantly lower objective response rate than the TARE-eligible group (9.7% vs. 56.9%, P<0.001). Conclusion: TARE-ineligible patients had larger tumors and higher MoRAL scores than TARE-eligible patients. Treatment with TACE, owing to high LSF, was associated with a shorter TTP even after balancing tumor size and MoRAL scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]